Mummy's Wide Skirts

Once again, we have another one of those 'Riddle me this' questions. Let's say this time that (as I commented here) newly made BNP MEP Andrew Brons’ Brussels researcher was ‘exposed’ as having a history of going on NF marches calling Israel all sorts of names, such as an ‘apartheid state’. He might even have been kicked out of the Students Union for mimicking violence against ‘Zionists’. Anxious to preserve their thin veneer of respectability (don’t laugh) Brons fires him as the Internet clamour grows.

Would Harry's Place, so vigilant as they normally are in exposing and condemning racism in all forms including this one, agree to give that researcher a guest post spot to defend himself? Not a freakin chance! Yet now that 'Seph' Brown has been dismissed from his job with a Labour MP, he is being given a chance to blather on about how unfair it all is, and has even used it to single out all the people who 'persecuted' him during his time at University by racial group. It's all just one giant Jooooooooish Conspiracy you know!

I admire the editorial line of Harry's Place for the most part. Yet when faced with clear documentary evidence of racism and extremism, they just can't quite bring themselves to disown someone 'of the Left' for actions which would have brought universal editorial opprobrium had they been committed by anyone 'of the Right'.

Maybe that's why they have taken over so many of our institutions, and poisoned our culture so effectively. Because when it comes down to it, even basically decent Lefties are still willing to give the nutters the benefit of the doubt on grounds of their theoretical base ideology, and are united by that ideological bond. Whereas the Right is endlessly fractured along lines of moral and principle on individual issues and questions and absolutely refuses, often to its cost politically, to compromise and indulge in any but the tiniest amount of groupthink. When it does make serious attempts to (UKIP's endless infighting being an obvious example) the results are always similar to a ship being steered by five or six different people at the same time, with others constantly clamouring to be allowed to take the wheel because only they really know where the ship should be going.

I'm pretty sure I qualify as being 'of the Right', and I rather admire those who refuse to compromise their morals and principles for political expediency even when I disagree with those particular mores. But there are times when I do wistfully wonder what it would be like to be just a little bit more united against the bad guys...

And then I look at the "power for power's sake" Cameroonites and the 'proper' Left, and realise that actually, no, I'll go with the principled infighting, thanks.

Walking Like A Duck

Riddle me this. If the BNP (or, to internationalise things, the Republican Party) employed a senior official with an enormous fetish for Nazi memorabilia, who posted on multiple 'memorabilia' websites, authored his own highly expensive tract on the subject, posed for pictures wearing a T-Shirt with an Iron Cross and a WW2 Nazi slogan on it, drove a vehicle with the licence plate 'Flak88' and posted under the same name on numerous 'memorabilia' forums, would the MSM be somewhat...silent on the subject, especially if that senior official had authored a rather large number of extremely anti-Israel 'reports' for his organisation of choice?

I'm thinking maybe a big fat No. In fact, I'm thinking the headlines would be screaming 'BNP/Republican Nazi Fetishist Has Heil Hitler Licence Plate'. But, when the anti-Israelism is coming from an Official Leftie writing for an Official Leftie NGO which has since accused anyone pointing out the facts of merely attempting to maliciously cover up for the crimes of the dastardly Jews, those crickets are chirping like there's no tomorrow.

If it walks like a Duck, or goosesteps like a Nazi for that matter...

Marc Garlasco, absolutely not a Jew-hating Nazi scumbag, honest.

(Tip of the hat to the last bastion of the decent Left, Harry's Place)

Hey, No Worries, Its Just Legitimate Criticism Of Israel, Right?

...or not. S'funny though when you think about it. A swastika-waving Neo-Nazi group produces a leaflet saying that if you join the US Army you are fighting for Israel and features a stereotypical bignosed Jew giving orders to a US soldier...this would no doubt be called anti-semitic in nature by all but the most rabid of commentators. And yet...

Waving flags of organisations dedicated to killing Jews and destroying Israel at a Leftist rally? That's 'showing solidarity with the poor oppressed Palestinians'.

Waving banners calling Jews 'Zionist pigs' with fanged demons wearing Israeli skullcaps in the background at a Leftist? 'Legitimate criticism'.

'No blood for Israel' signs at a Leftwing rally? 'Hey, that's because, you know, Israel, you know, leaned on the US somehow to invade Iraq, right? We have absolutely no proof of this but, well what about AIPAC and the Jewish, whoops, sorry Zionist lobby?'

Let me repeat, all these messages are Leftwing messages, found at every so-called 'antiwar' rally, found on every Leftist Blog such as the increasingly vile and more importantly openly anti-Jewish Daily Kos. Leftist opinion journals like Counterpunch carry this kind of material constantly...here's a subtle and tasty quote which puts me in mind of a cockroach running for the darkness at the mere thought of having the light shined on it...this is how Counterpunch writer
Arthur Neslen feels about the latest report (not suppressed this time thankfully) on anti-semitism from the EU.

'Anti-Semitism', its report began, 'is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred'. Such a perception could include stereotypical or dehumanising libels about, for example: "The power of Jews as a collective - such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions."

But it could also include a litany of lobbyist shibboleths, such as:

"Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination (e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor); Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation... Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis; Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel."

Uh-huh. So whilst he wouldnt dream of thinking of himself as an anti-Semite, Neslen feels that claiming the very existence of Israel is racist and that its actions are comparable to Nazism is legitimate criticism. Expecting Israel to behave to a totally different standard of behaviour than every other nation? Not at all unreasonable! Collective responsibility (hmmm, where have we heard that one before, could it be from Leftists like Neslen whining that the security fence which has so drastically reduced terror attacks on Israeli soil is 'collective punishment' for the Palestinians?) ? Perfectly fine and dandy - as long as it is only applied to the Jews.

Ironically, Neslen claims himself (without evidence of course) to have been a victim of anti-semitism from...you guessed it, the BNP! Who he then goes on to mention (broadly) supported Israel's efforts against Hezbollah in Lebanon - you'd think that might be food for thought for someone who is 'definitely not an anti-semite' but most definitely didnt express the same support for anyone but Hezbollah themselves...

Its when Neslen comments on Palestinian anti-semitism though, that his true colours really show through.

"Certainly, some Palestinians talk about 'Yehuds' in a derogatory fashion, cite libellous texts without forethought and make foolish statements about the Holocaust. But that's what happens to language when you step on someone's throat."

'A derogatory fashion'?!? Palestinian schools feature literature, teaching and posters with subtle and tasty quotes such as 'Killing a Jew brings you closer to God'. Libellous texts? Well, after the Koran, Mein Kampf is currently the bestselling book in the Arab world. And the PA is currently run by Mahmoud Abbas, a man whose doctoral thesis was, you guessed it, a denial of the Holocaust.

What kind of person can interpret the undeniably genocidal nature of the Palestinian attitude to Jews as 'talking about them in a derogatory fashion'? Only one kind, the same kind that genuinely believes that Israel is 'stepping on Palestinian throats' by protecting itself and that claiming the very existence of the world's only Jewish State is racist is perfectly legitimate.

At least the people who distributed the literature in Berkeley are honest about their racism and their hatred. The anti-semites of the Left dont even have that to commend them.

(Cross-posted at A Tangled Web)

An Interesting Perspective...

...on Israel's troubles.

"Arabs are a hot crowd. They will riot about excavations on the Temple Mount, Separation Barrier, antiterrorist operations. Arabs will catch on the American Blacks’ strategy, and demand perks and super-equality. Israeli Arabs will dictate their will to the Jews, trample on Jewish institutions, demand personal and municipal subsidies, infrastructure projects in their villages. Arabs used to be Israeli untouchables. They would remain untouchables, but now because the Jews are afraid to touch them. Political correctness of Jews is the ultimate Arab weapon."

Samson Blinded is a 'Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict'. The conclusions the author draws are not always those I would agree with, but his Machiavellian perspective certainly does give an extremely welcome fresh take on the manner in which the cowardice and realpolitik of Israel's leaders rather than the anti-Semitism of the world's media or even the hostile intent of the Arabs may be what is ultimately responsible for its demise.

The Naked Jew-Hatred Of Al-Beeb

Here's the plot, right?

Islamic Terrorists storm into an Embassy, hold the people inside it hostage, including the same incompetent bunch of MI5 agents who always seem to have managed to get themselves held hostage - this was happening both the last two times I accidentally tuned into the pile of monumental shite that is Spooks. The Terrorists then start shooting hostages one by one until their demands are met (seems unclear what they actually were) until, yes, they are dramatically revealed as...JEWS!

Yes folks, its Mossad in disguise, taking hostages and committing murder for no apparent reason whilst pretending to be Al-Qaeda...led from behind the scenes by their sinister fat, balding, and therefore obviously Jewish handler. He even mouths 'Shalom' apparently, just so there's no confusion.

Is this an isolated incident on this particular freakshow? Nuh-uh. In Al-Beeb's world London it seems is positively teeming with incompetent Jewish assassins and shadowy traitors willing to do the evil Mossad's bidding, duped nonetheless by equally evil Christian fundamentalists, who as well all know have a well-developed intelligence network and terror capabilities capable (apparently) of fooling even possibly the shrewdest intelligence service in the world.

As Eric explains:

"The really bad guys in last night's episode manage to trick the Mossad into thinking that the show's hero, an MI5 agent, is some kind of anti-Semite (obviously grounds for instant assassination - Ken Livingstone watch out! -DSD) , so the Mossad sends in a crack assassination team of around six men armed with easily-identifiable Israeli pistols. ("Ooo! Jerichos - they must be Israelis!" declares one of the crack MI5 team.)

Fortunately, the tall blonde heroine this season (who in the previous episode snarls out the phrase 'Yemenite Jew') - (subtle and tasty stuff from Al-Beeb there, I wonder if any of the characters has ever snarled 'Pali Muslim' with such venom - DSD) uses her martial arts skills to disarm most of them, while unarmed hero Adam deals with the rest. The one surviving member of this "elite" unite of bumbling Jewish terrorists is called off following a phone call made by MI5 boss Harry to his Israeli counterpart, the cultural attache at the Israeli embassy. Harry threatens to have all the Mossad agents in London deported if they don't stop shooting at MI5 officers right now. And no, I'm not making this up.

I wish he was. But of course this is where fiction runs too now - no 'serious' political dramatist would ever dare reflect the real world where Islamic Terrorists actually do murder hostages, do storm embassies and arent either Jews in disguise or manipulated by them (or the Christian Fundamentalists, well known as they are for their subtlety and craft in such matters).

Nah, much easier just to script another thrilling episode of 'blame the Jews'.

Just So We're Clear About Which Side I'M On

This is extremely painful viewing, I warn you now. Despite my usual loathing of people such as the woman in this video who have suddenly woken up to the wrongness of their actions, even my stony heart was somewhat moved by her obvious guilt and shame.

Possibly the worst part is the group of Pali kids sitting with the toy guns boasting of their desire to kill Jews. Palestinian child abuse, nothing less.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is simply wrong.

That's It. You Lost Me, Right There.

Its funny how the small things can be the tipping points. But they are nonetheless important for all that. As Laban Tall rightly points out, there appears to be very little difference between the anti-semitic themes of Left and Right nowadays. The BNP leopard has pretended to change its spots, but whether or not the rhetoric is as violent and vicious as in days gone by, I have been watching the same tired old themes of BNP anti-semitism play themselves out in recent weeks nonetheless. Its the 'Zionist Lobby', the 'neocons', the idea that attacking Iran is a bad idea because...well its what the Jews must want so there must be something wrong with it, right?

I am, as many have observed, a very very angry person. Once upon a time I was a very angry young person who saw his country being raped and his culture murdered, and felt that everyone but those who were standing against that destruction was the enemy. It took me a while to see through what it was they were standing for as well as against, and find out that it was every bit as abhorrent to me as the things I was fighting against. But I learned my lesson.

I really wanted it to be true now, that in the BNP there was a Party that would grow out of its lunatic roots and take a moral stand against the corruption of our country, the degeneration of our morality, the rape and murder of our culture. But it is not to be, I am very much afraid.

You see, I realised something a while back. I may agree with fighting the influence of Islam with every breath in my body, with fighting the Leftist grip on the media, with ending positive discrimination in all its pernicious forms, and yes I do find that I sometimes think things which are sweeping, all-inclusive and target all of a certain group or groups with the same brush. And when I do, I mentally slap myself down and thank my lucky stars for the one thing which keeps me grounded.

My Zionism.

Its my Zionism that keeps me on the straight and narrow. Its my Zionism that keeps me from saying 'its them and us, and only us' every time I see another white man in Court on trumped up charges, or yet another white boy or girl murdered by 'ethnics' as the BNP parlance would have it and ignored by the same media that screams the reverse from the rooftops every time anyone of my ethnic group even looks at somebody from another in the wrong way. Its my Zionism that reminds me where the BNP came from and where, yes, they are still mired no matter how much many of us would desperately like to believe they are not.

So I may rejoin UKIP now Farage has seemingly woken up to what he needs to do to turn them into a true professional Party and a credible force in British politics. I may avoid Party Politics altogether for some time once more. But whatever else happens, one thing is for sure.

I will NOT be voting BNP.

I Hope Condi Rice's Neighbours Get Rabies...

...and then spend the next sixty years trying to shoot, bomb, and otherwise exterminate her. And her children. And her children's children. Even if she hides behind a tree.

"Oh Muslim, there is a Dhimmi bitch hiding behind me pretending to be a Conservative, come and kill her."

My contempt for this woman truly knows no bounds. At every turn she has attempted to bully Israel (and succeeded) and appease Islam in general and the Palestinians specifically. The 'humiliation of occupation' is caused by standing next to another country after voting in a government sworn to exterminate every single citizen of that country. It is caused by teaching your children hatred from the moment they begin what passes for Nursery Education in your sick and perverted society until the day they are old enough to blow up innocent women and children and be hailed as a martyr.

Most of the world thinks its humane to shoot a rabid animal. It certainly needs to be quarantined away from those it wishes to harm until it can be cured.

Only the Left and Condoleeza Rice think that the most important talking point is that the animal is 'humiliated' by the steps the civilised world has to take to deal with it.

Why Is There Never One Of Those Surgical Strike Thingies Around When You Need One? (Warning: Extreme Rant)

Seriously.

Just think of how many of Britain's problems could have been solved in one stroke. Seeing as its only a 'tiny minority of extremists' anyway, we could have got rid of a huge percentage of the problem with one sweet little flight of jets. All those cunts in Hezbollah shirts declaring how they are 'Victorious', all the pieces of shit who think wearing Palestinian bandanas is cool and radically chic, in fact every single one of the scum who turned the perfectly reasonable sentiment of 'Fuck Off Mr Blair, Your Time Is Up' into an anti-semitic, pro-terrorism hatefest.

My favourite is the smug little shit standing in front of the Respect banner which is laughably subtitled 'Peace Justice Equality'. Holding a T-shirt with the Hezbollah symbol on it.

Come to Christchurch you bunch of utter, utter cunts. Come here and I'll fucking take you down altogether or one at a time. I don't give a fuck how many of you there are, I'll leave every single one of you bleeding if it takes me all day. Muslims, Respect, Greens, Communists, Southampton Socialists (your only up the road, maybe I'll come and pay you a visit you motherfuckers), StopTheWar (as long as it isnt the one against Jews, right?), Socialist Workers, I dont care. I'll put every single one of you on the floor and smear pigfat all over your faces with my Size Eights.

This is my fucking Jihad, and it tastes good.

(Rant Ends, normal slightly more restrained service will be resumed when I calm down a bit.)

Happy Rosh Hashanah...

...to all evil Zionist Conspirators everywhere. May a New Year bring new hope and new strength.

DSD

The Rally The MSM Forgot - And A Question For That Nice Mr Olmert

Just as not a single British media outlet covered the pro-Israeli rally in Kenton, NW London a few weeks ago, so it goes with what should theoretically be big news in New York, outside the UN to be precise. Now seeing as we have pictures of every moonbat, anti-western, anti-Jewish and pro-Jihadi rally that involves more than two old burqa-clad ladies and their dog Wufi splashed all over the pages of the MSM, you'd think that 30,000 plus people demonstrating against Ahmadinejihad's presence at the UN to spread his evil poison would be equally big news.

Nuh-uh.

The mighty Atlas has pictures and video.

Elsewhere, Little Green Footballs also brings us a touching little tableau of a Spanish 'peacekeeper' demonstrating his allegiance to the cause of neutrality...by happily shaking the hand of a Hezbollah supporter on his way to the enormous victory rally about to take place in Beirut.

The VICTORY rally? Got that Olmert, you blithering idiot? Because thanks to your cowardice, because of your desperate clinging to the futile belief that the UN is on anyone's side but the Jihadists, because of your pathetic media whoring, you now have more foreign troops on Lebanese soil.

Troops that will act as even more effective human shields for Hezbollah than the Lebanese Shia. Troops that will willingly stand by just as UNIFIL did and watch the weapons and rockets flow into Southern Lebanon, and will not simply wring their hands about it but in some cases actually applaud. Troops, however, that will be in place at strategic points to prevent large-scale Israeli ground incursions into Lebanon when they are needed in the future. And you know they will be, because your commanders and Mossad will have told you that the weapons and rockets are flowing once again into Lebanon, that Hezbollah is gearing up for another round.

And what are you doing? Are you striking those convoys as they enter Lebanon? Are you insisting that the UN make an attempt to enforce Resolution 1559 and at least make some show of neutrality? Are you screaming the duplicity of the UN (which funnily enough the entire pro-Israeli Blogosphere could see coming from the somewhat limited vantage point of our monitors, but you apparently couldnt) from the rooftops as we are?

No. He isnt. This is the man who has told us that Israel is 'tired of fighting, tired of winning'. That the Holocaust-denying Mahmoud Abbas, PA leader, a specimen whose doctoral thesis was based on Holocaust denial and the idea that 'the Zionists' actually cooperated in the Holocaust (that didnt happen, but such is the schizoid nature of Arab intellectualism) in order to displace the Palestinians is a 'courageous partner'. He says that Jacques Chirac is 'one of the greatest fighters against anti-Semitism in the world' (!)

So are you doing for your people right now, Mr Olmert? What are you doing to make sure rockets never rain down on Haifa again? To secure the release of your captured soldiers, which you promised you would do before any ceasefire with Hezbollah or withdrawal from Lebanon took place? What are you there for, if you cant do these things?

I'd really like to know.

Peace Activists In Their Natural Habitat

I have always maintained that scum like Christian 'Peace'Makers and the International Solidarity Movement are not peace protesters and are in fact simply supporters of those who war against our society. Normally I'd expect to have to make a fairly detailed argument such as this one to defend that position, but sometimes life just throws you a gift you can't pass up...I have to be honest and admit that I often dont read the Frontpage articles which pass in front of me despite being on their daily mailing list, because they are often far too lengthy and convoluted for a simple soul like me. This one however I thoroughly recommend.

So without further ado...I give you the peace-loving activists of the International Solidarity Movement, who are absolutely to be trusted when they are telling us how it is the Israelis who are the violent ones. Honest.

STOP THE ISM.

Sorry, Didnt You All Get The 'Jews Control The Media' Memo?

I'm confused. The Arabs, the neo-Nazis and the Jew-hating Left usually tell us how Israel controls the worldwide media, so how come these rich Arabs think they can buy themselves biased coverage just by, you know, buying themselves biased coverage? Dammit people, didnt you get the memo?

Quoty Quoty Quoty

Ladies and gents, I give you some more choice little moments from around the Blogosphere to be going on with...the first from Rottypup's new poster child, the charmingly namd Ranting Guttersnipe on the subject of Blair's supposedly imminent departure from office.

Mr Guttersnipe has fisked the Mirror's fawning article on this very subject in admirably blunt fashion:

Says The Mirror:

Mr Blair's final weeks in office will be particularly carefully choreographed to ensure cheers rather than jeers. Under the heading "Last month" the memo suggests: "Needs a daily grid, planned to the last detail. As much as possible a farewell tour, looking to the future, making sure the party is in the right place and the public remember him as he should be."

Says Mr Guttersnipe:

Rather than remember him as he was .... a limelight hugging statist control freak fucking camera whore with delusions of putting the rest of world to rights while shafting Britain up the ass with a pineapple?

Can't really argue with that one myself frankly. And on the subject of Rotty, well we all know that he and I are from very different schools of thought on the subject of Blair - I'm with Mr Guttersnipe, he is of a rather different opinion on the man himself, but it appears we are in complete agreement as to the vile nature of his Political Party:

"See, while Conservatives (right-thinking ones, anyway) are willing to give Blair huge credit for standing firm against Islamofascism, leftists everywhere loathe him for just this very reason. George Bush, closer ties with the U.S., the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq — Sooner or later, Labour back-benchers had to snap.

As it turns out, the final straw was Blair’s refusal to join them in condemning Israel for acting in her own defence. Given the almost-pathological levels of anti-Semitism present in the British left, perhaps this isn’t so surprising. But. Still. If Blair does fall over this issue, you couldn’t wish for a better example of all that’s wrong with leftism:

Wreck the country you’re supposed to be governing and they’ll smile approvingly — Try to prevent a second Holocaust and they’ll fire you."

Now THAT last line is right on the money.

Lessons The Media Is Determined Not To Learn

The latest for those who missed it: the new media 'screwup' concerns manifold lurid reports of Israel supposedly targeting Red Cross Ambulances in Lebanon. With Zionist missiles that dont explode and small-arms fire from drones, so sophisticated that they can hit the same helmet on three different people at the same time, throw someone '25 feet in a huge fireball' and leave him completely uninjured to pose for the cameras a couple of days later, shear someone's right leg off without any blood, have it grow back and even replace the left one, remove ventilation domes from the top of ambulances, and even cave in windscreens inwards from the inside.

Those wacky old Jewish war criminals eh? Whatever will they come up with next?

Here's the long, extended-edition debunking from Zombietime. But for a fairly decent summary with a soundtrack to nod your head along to, My Pet Jawa does it again.

No more posts today. Coursework beckons.

A Perfect Example...

...of a Leftist Jew-hater. Go and read the thoughts of 'Cunningham' on that good old canard, the influence of Jewish (*cough, cough*, sorry, 'Israeli') 'interests' on American foreign policy. There are such gems as the one below on Ahmadinejihad, and doubtless will be more once he reads my, erm, blunt reply:

"Ahmadinejad is mad, bad and dangerous. But he was elected in a more or less democratic process, and there is no easy way to get rid of him."

You have to ask yourself what colour the sky is in this idiot's world. Purple perhaps. But the real thrust of his comment becomes very clear right at the end:

"The US, and the world, is therefore now dependent on the good-old UN. This loss of clout is all a result of the mismanagement by the present US administration, and specifically of its eagerness to tie its middle-east policy to Israel’s self-interest."

Yep, its ZOG and the Vast Zionist Conspiracy all over again. Our Middle-East expert Cunningham informs us that the US didnt invade Afghanistan because it was pursuing the people who killed thousands of its citizens on 9/11, presumably that was just a smokescreen - actually the Jews told them to do it! And Iraq? Yep, 'Israeli self-interest' again apparently.

I'd love to know what exactly it is Cunningham and his fellow Jew-haters believe Israel actually GETS out of all this supposed influence on US Foreign Policy. What possible interest of Israel's has been served by either the invasion of Iraq or that of Afghanistan? By Condi 's cosying up to every Muslim she can lay her hands on, bless her Dhimmi heart? By the US agreeing to try and force Israel to accept a ceasfire which it is obvious is worth absolutely nothing to her?

But there is no interest being served of course. The Leftist horror at the thought of any Government standing up to the savagery of Islamic terrorism is only explicable to them provided that somewhere behind it all must be a Jew pulling the strings - after all, the Left has no problem with the Jews being 'wiped off the map' if it appeases Islam, so naturally if anyone else does it must all be a 'conspiracy', mustnt it?

The thought that anyone might stand up for Israel because they think its the right thing to do just never enters their morally bankrupt little minds.

Israel

A Small Note To The Lebanese People

I don't know Irwin Graulich. But I think I like him. He is apparently President/CEO of his own rather successful business, so isnt in the position of, say, the unfortunate Inigo Wilson where he can be fired for not exactly expressing the 'right' viewpoints.

Mr Graulich hits things rather succinctly on the head with his diatribe to the Lebanese, and frankly sets the ground which I rather feel we ought to have been fighting all along about the 'conflict' in Lebanon and Israel (I do not call it a 'conflict in Lebanon'). And I say this as someone who has posted extensively about Qana, perhaps to the detrimental exclusion of what should have been equally extensive commenting the morality of both sides in the actual 'conflict' itself.

Mr Graulich, you have pretty much covered it from my point of view, even if the pitiful PM Olmert didnt exactly live up to your expectations. Thanks for saving me the typing time.

Those Poor, Innocent Lebanese By Irwin N. Graulich August 4, 2006

Let me get this straight. You allow one of the largest terrorist organizations in the world to set up shop throughout your country. You permit them to completely take over the entire southern third of your country and you claim to have seen nothing.You allow the terrorists to build sophisticated, fortified bunkers and you did not see any heavy equipment building them. You allow the Hezbollah terrorists to move into many of your towns and villages, including the complete takeover of one of the largest neighborhoods in Beirut, where they proceed to build numerous, complex command and control centers ... and you claim ignorance.

You allow the terrorists to store weapons, bombs and rockets in your basements. You turn a blind's eye when they carry arms into your restaurants, stores and buildings. Yet you call yourself an "innocent civilian."You sleep with dogs, you wake up with fleas. You sleep with missiles, you wake up dead.You watch the parades with hundreds of thousands of participants including children screaming, "Jihad. Death to Israel, Jews and Americans," burning American and Israeli flags. Goose-stepping soldiers with Nazi-like salutes receive your cheers--and all of you "innocent civilians" did not see a thing (even though you were captured on videotape).There are giant posters of the rubenesque terrorist leader, Hasan Nasrallah, all over Lebanon with headlines declaring the imminent destruction of Israel. Yet you choose to elect this terrorist
party to your government--and all of the so called "innocent Lebanese" do not know anything about anything.Twenty thousand rockets and launchers are shipped into your country along with other military equipment by plane, truck and ship, and the government industrial complex knew absolutely nothing; and neither did all those "poor, innocent civilians" who are now crying.

The Lebanese "knowingly allowed (aka aided and abbetted)" murderous terrorists to proliferate in their sovereign nation. Like spoiled teenagers, they now refuse to take any responsibility. Of course there are some truly innocent civilians, but there were hundreds of thousands of beautiful German babies and mothers in Dresden and Berlin who were blown to bits. If an attack emanates from your country, the entire country is responsible. That is how life works. Sometimes it is unfair.I hate when people lie to my face and expect me to believe
their vile fabrications. Does the Muslim world really think that the vast majority of Americans are that foolish? Only the quislings at CNN like Larry King, Nic Robertson, Wolf Blitzer, et al will fall for this Joseph Goebbels-style propaganda.The confused, immoral left and their paper of record, The New York Times only see "innocent civilians throughout Lebanon." Europe, that moral bastion which gave birth to Nazism, will look at photos of men, women and children in despair, without putting the image into its proper context. Yet countries like Sweden, Switzerland and Ireland, who could not decide whether to support Hitler or Churchill during WWII, can drum up the moral authority to criticize Israel today. And leave it to Vichy, France 2006 headed by Jaques "Petain" Chirac to condemn Israel's response.

Seeing television snippets of wounded or dead Lebanese with people sitting on the ground crying and calling them all "innocent civilians" is the same as looking at a photograph of the armpit of Christie Brinkley and saying, "Here is the photo of a supermodel. Isn't she beautiful?"

The armpit picture is only a part of the story. When human beings see babies or mothers hurting, no matter what, we feel the pain. If we saw baby pictures of Charles Manson, we would want to cuddle him.We cannot look at photos of so-called "innocent civilians" in a vacuum. It is important for all "moral, decent" human beings to realize that the compassion emotion is similar to the sex emotion. Often times, it interferes with truth, logic and morality. Listen up, all you "Innocent Lebanese along with your innocent, Hezbollah supporting government." Do you want to know why your towns, villages and cities are smoldering? Do you want to know why 800,000 people are homeless and 600 are dead? Do you want to know why your infrastructure
is devastated?

The answer is: The Jews are simply not going to pack up their little valises and walk into gas chambers again. The Jews will not be taken from their homes and marched into the Mediterranean Sea by Nazis or Hezbollah-Hamas-Syrian-Iranian, Nazi-like sympathizers. The Jews in Israel or anywhere else are just not going to allow themselves to be shipped away like you dream about every day. Attention all radical Muslims throughout the entire world and Jacques Chirac. The Jews will not be walking into death camps or graves ever again, and if you dare try it, Qana, Tyre, Nabatiyeh, Bint Jbeil, Kounine, Beit Yahoun, Rashaya, Baalbek, Majdel Zoun, Ayt-a-Shab, etc. will all look a whole lot worse than Dresden and Berlin. And Beirut may in the end become hotter than Hiroshima.Attention Lebanon--your country is smoldering because Jews are sick and tired of being murdered. You keep pushing those
pathetic, weak, Torah studying Jews by using terrorism and kidnapping soldiers and all, yes all, of Lebanon will be smoldering.

I urge any person that will be having dinner with Sayed Hassan Nesrallah, the big fat brave man hiding in his little rat hole while his fighters are being picked off like little olives on a tree, to make sure his life insurance is fully paid. Nasrallah is just a pimp for Iran, sending out his Hezbollah terrorist hookers to "screw the Jews." The amazing thing is that Iran is not an Arab country. They should not be involved in the Arab-Israeli conflict. They do not border Israel, so there is no Iranian territorial dispute where they claim, like everyone else, that Israel occupies their land. Yet, Ahmadinejad's (pronounced--"a mad dog on Jihad") hatred for Jews and Israel rivals that of Adolf Hitler.It is no wonder that the Iranian president feels this way. Israel is supreme in virtually every area--technically, militarily, scientifically, culturally, morally and religiously. Each attempt by macho Muslim/Arab countries to destroy Israel has been met with a totally devastating, humiliating defeat. Like Saddam, the skinny little Ahmadinejad aspires to be the big hero of the Muslim world.

Ahmadinejad should not be deluded into thinking that he will get off as lightly as the Lebanese. He does not comprehend is that Israel will not use a tongue depressor when they capture him and his associates. Should Iran dare make one wrong move on Israel, Israel will simply "Beat the Shiite out of them!"

Who Needs Those Highly-Trained Anemones Anyway?

Pop Quiz before I get onto an account of our luverly London trip later kidz:

Who dya think would say the following?

"The NY Times is no more biased against Israel than any other US paper, and has no more of a tendency to plaster negative news about Israel all over the front page than any other US paper. It's only a target for idiots like moderndayknight because it's a newspaper of record and it reports news items that they dont want to hear. It's never good policy to shoot the messenger, or as I like to call it "pulling a Saddam Hussein" (who was famous for shooting anyone who brought him bad news)"

"I dont know jack about the british media but the US media, including AP and reuters (which is half belgian), does not have an anti-israel agenda."

"Pointing out something I know for a fact...that there is no institutionalized anti-israel conspiracy in the media, is always helpful to Israel."

"EU Referendum, for its part, probably did as much harm as good. by their own admission they blew the AP and Reuters people off when they asked to talk to them and took a confrontational attitude that most likely made them less than inclined to play ball and remove the photos."

"EU Referendum was not exactly a huge help posting this stuff and implying AP was intentionally deceiving people. the blog post was not considered a "smoking gun". the theory was not verified until some german news agency ran footage of green helmet stage directing the whole thing and taking bodies out of ambulances.I have experience dealing with both reuters and AP in israel. they pride themselves on accuracy and are solid companies. if you can make a solid case that their information is not credible they will remove it from the wires. always. hell if you talk to the actual reporters in the field they'll correct it before it ever hits the wires."

(emphases mine)

So, guesses? How about a senior Foreign Office Official? Guardian Journalist? Kofi Annan? Kathleen Carroll of Associated Press? Green Helmet Guy?

No. A " 'highly-trained, vastly experienced' pro-Israeli activist'. "

As the saying goes, with friends like these...oh, and he told them all to vote Kadima as well. What an utter tool.

Save The Children - Officially Judenfrei

Via Stephen Pollard, it seems that Save The Children are now taking their 'impartial charity work' to a rather different place. Yes, Save The Children has made itself, by its own admission, officially Judenfrei. The reason? No, not that they are choosing to emote over Arabs rather than those pesky Jooooz who cause all these 'humanitarian crises' by refusing to allow people to murder their civilians at will, but because 'Israel has systems in place' to deal with such matters as dozens of Katyusha and Qassam rockets being fired into their cities at random.

The message? Its OK to violently target children of 'certain' religions in 'certain' countries as long as they have 'systems' in place - but not others. Oh, wait - apparently the UK doesnt have 'systems' in place either, in fact there only seems to be one country where children regularly suffer 'dislocation' as a result of violence which does have these vaunted systems in place which exclude it from receiving Save The Children's largesse.

There is only one word for this, and its not one I like to use unless its clearly justified because it is probably the most overused one in the English language. But this is racism, in the clearest possible sense of the word, and should consign Save The Children to the evergrowing list of Leftist NGO's with an anti-Jewish and pro-Terrorism agenda which all of us should boycott forthwith.

Associated Press Lies Continue - 'Green Helmet Is Actually Just A Regular Family Guy'

In a truly astonishing anti-Israel propaganda piece, AP's Kathy Gannon embellishes the fiction that Green Helmet Guy is 'just a rescue worker'.

"I am just a civil defense worker. I have done this job all my life."

And not only that, he's a family guy as well. Awww...

Even after the Qana video footage showing him orchestrating the puppetry of bodies being moved to and from ambulances to give a better shot for the cameras, even after he tells the cameraman he isnt getting the right kind of footage, even after the 'civilians' of Qana are seen clearly following his orders and deferring to him almost fearfully, Associated Press are still telling lies.

The media is the enemy too. Never a truer word was spoken.