A Perfect Example...
...of a Leftist Jew-hater. Go and read the thoughts of 'Cunningham' on that good old canard, the influence of Jewish (*cough, cough*, sorry, 'Israeli') 'interests' on American foreign policy. There are such gems as the one below on Ahmadinejihad, and doubtless will be more once he reads my, erm, blunt reply:
"Ahmadinejad is mad, bad and dangerous. But he was elected in a more or less democratic process, and there is no easy way to get rid of him."
You have to ask yourself what colour the sky is in this idiot's world. Purple perhaps. But the real thrust of his comment becomes very clear right at the end:
"The US, and the world, is therefore now dependent on the good-old UN. This loss of clout is all a result of the mismanagement by the present US administration, and specifically of its eagerness to tie its middle-east policy to Israel’s self-interest."
Yep, its ZOG and the Vast Zionist Conspiracy all over again. Our Middle-East expert Cunningham informs us that the US didnt invade Afghanistan because it was pursuing the people who killed thousands of its citizens on 9/11, presumably that was just a smokescreen - actually the Jews told them to do it! And Iraq? Yep, 'Israeli self-interest' again apparently.
I'd love to know what exactly it is Cunningham and his fellow Jew-haters believe Israel actually GETS out of all this supposed influence on US Foreign Policy. What possible interest of Israel's has been served by either the invasion of Iraq or that of Afghanistan? By Condi 's cosying up to every Muslim she can lay her hands on, bless her Dhimmi heart? By the US agreeing to try and force Israel to accept a ceasfire which it is obvious is worth absolutely nothing to her?
But there is no interest being served of course. The Leftist horror at the thought of any Government standing up to the savagery of Islamic terrorism is only explicable to them provided that somewhere behind it all must be a Jew pulling the strings - after all, the Left has no problem with the Jews being 'wiped off the map' if it appeases Islam, so naturally if anyone else does it must all be a 'conspiracy', mustnt it?
The thought that anyone might stand up for Israel because they think its the right thing to do just never enters their morally bankrupt little minds.
Israel
"Ahmadinejad is mad, bad and dangerous. But he was elected in a more or less democratic process, and there is no easy way to get rid of him."
You have to ask yourself what colour the sky is in this idiot's world. Purple perhaps. But the real thrust of his comment becomes very clear right at the end:
"The US, and the world, is therefore now dependent on the good-old UN. This loss of clout is all a result of the mismanagement by the present US administration, and specifically of its eagerness to tie its middle-east policy to Israel’s self-interest."
Yep, its ZOG and the Vast Zionist Conspiracy all over again. Our Middle-East expert Cunningham informs us that the US didnt invade Afghanistan because it was pursuing the people who killed thousands of its citizens on 9/11, presumably that was just a smokescreen - actually the Jews told them to do it! And Iraq? Yep, 'Israeli self-interest' again apparently.
I'd love to know what exactly it is Cunningham and his fellow Jew-haters believe Israel actually GETS out of all this supposed influence on US Foreign Policy. What possible interest of Israel's has been served by either the invasion of Iraq or that of Afghanistan? By Condi 's cosying up to every Muslim she can lay her hands on, bless her Dhimmi heart? By the US agreeing to try and force Israel to accept a ceasfire which it is obvious is worth absolutely nothing to her?
But there is no interest being served of course. The Leftist horror at the thought of any Government standing up to the savagery of Islamic terrorism is only explicable to them provided that somewhere behind it all must be a Jew pulling the strings - after all, the Left has no problem with the Jews being 'wiped off the map' if it appeases Islam, so naturally if anyone else does it must all be a 'conspiracy', mustnt it?
The thought that anyone might stand up for Israel because they think its the right thing to do just never enters their morally bankrupt little minds.
Israel
Labels: Afghanistan, Israel, Moonbats
posted by Dangerouslysubversivedad at 3:51 PM
2 Comments:
"Ahmadinejad is mad, bad and dangerous. But he was elected in a more or less democratic process, and there is no easy way to get rid of him."
What's wrong with this quote? He got 62% of the vote on a 60% turnout. The government determined which candidates could initially stand - but the final round was a head-to-head French-style run-off between the two most popular candidates, and the other guy was more moderate than Ahmadinejad.
This suggests that his direction is the genuine choice of the Iranian people, no?
PDF
oOK, so first off you'd regard British elections as free and fair if Blair and the Cabinet got to choose the eligible candidates. Well that says a lot.
Second, what colour is the sky in the world of PDF? Is it the same alternate reality as Cunningham's where the same regime which hangs homosexuals and rape victims, imprisons women for inappropriate dress and says another nation should be exterminated actually allowed a completely free, fair and not at all violence and threat-dominated election?
Purple. Must be purple.
Post a Comment
<< Home