Jew-Hatin Loony Of The Year

Meet the man that dear not-at-all-incompetent President Obama thinks should be President of a medium-sized country.

TEGUCIGALPA -- It's been 89 days since Manuel Zelaya was booted from power. He's sleeping on chairs, and he claims his throat is sore from toxic gases and "Israeli mercenaries'' are torturing him with high-frequency radiation.

"We are being threatened with death,'' he said in an interview with The Miami Herald, adding that mercenaries were likely to storm the embassy where he has been holed up since Monday and assassinate him.

I blogged about this would-be-dictator and his Leftie fellow travellers on ATW before, assuming then he was just another, well, would-be dictator that ticked enough of the 'right' boxes for, as explained in the ATW post, 90% of the Left including President Obama to back him against his country's Congress, Supreme Court and military.

Didn't realise back then he was also a deranged Joooooo conspiracy theorist as well and therefore really ticks those boxes off. The fact that Obama is still backing this nutball and at his insistence the IMF is redirecting funds from the legitimate government and into the pockets of Zelaya's cronies says it all.

Hot Air has a little more on this, and reminds us that the Pig Song principle would be applied here by any sane administration.

The Last Refuges Of A Real Scoundrel

When Europhiles don patriotic clothes, it's really evidence of desperation. And none, it seems, are more desperate than the snappily-named Irish Europhiles of 'Generation Yes', personified here by one Sharon Waters.

Ms Waters is outraged - outraged I tell you! - at foreign intervention in the Irish referendum campaign. Her patriotic spirit is deeply offended.

"Generation YES are outr­aged at this intervention by foreign interests into this crucial debate on Ireland’s vital national interests."

What she is talking about, of course, is Nigel Farage's presence in Ireland, a small counterbalance to the steady stream of European politicians who are parading through the country issuing a mixture of threats and plautitudes. Dignitaries such as Lech Walesa, who seems to have totally forgotten the concepts which propelled him to prominence in the first place, and now even the newly reconfirmed Jose-Manuel Barroso as well (reconfirmed with the cooperation of the 'Eurosceptic' Tories, might I might I add).

But that's not 'outrageous foreign intervention' to Ms Waters. 'EU Money' (for which read British Taxpayers' Money) is pouring into the Yes campaign like a raging flood, but that is perfectly above board and acceptable.

What isn't acceptable is UKIP. Existing. At all. So Ms Waters launches into a breathless tirade of smears and outrageous lies to try and paint UKIP as barely short of the heirs to the Nazis. The most egregious passage is reproduced here:

"They seek to dismantle the Belfast Agreement (*1), reintroduce the death penalty (*2) and abolish social security (*3), they prevent disabled people from standing for election on their ticket (*4), and they also deny climate change (*5) and the Holocaust (*6)."

Where to start? Well with number one, I suppose. Now Nigel Farage's fierce antipathy to the Belfast Agreement is well known, in fact when I interviewed him for A Tangled Web a couple of years ago he referred to the Peace Process in general as 'loathsome'. But he is one person, and indeed is stepping down as Party Leader of UKIP.

The document referred to by Ms Waters can be downloaded here (my father was actually part of the Constitutional Policy Group which drafted it, by coincidence). It doesn't mention the Belfast Agreement at all. Not once. So Item One can be quite simply referred to as a Lie, Big Fat.

So to number two. The Death Penalty. Firstly, I personally would be proud to be part of a Party actively stating that it will reintroduce the Death Penalty if elected. However, UKIP isn't doing so. It has merely pledged a national Referendum on the subject in response to . So even leaving aside the pros and cons of the issue itself, this is a best a misrepresentation of UKIP's position and at worst a Lie, Small.

So, to Number Three. Abolish Social Security? Well I dont have a copy of the 2004 Election Manifesto referred to, but here's what the General Election manifesto a year later has to say on Welfare reform:

"The objective will be to free as many people as possible from benefits by making the rules more transparent and cutting down on means-testing."

UKIP has never, ever called for the complete abolition of Social Security. Frankly I find statements like the above rather on the wishy-washy side, and they are certainly a million miles away from abolition!

Verdict on Number Three? Lie, Big Fat and faintly Ridiculous as well.

So, to number four. The issue of 'no disabled candidates', referring to the whipped up storm about Jack Biggs, a disabled man who was offered a paper candidacy due to his local UKIP Branch's inability to support a candidate unable to deliver leaflets but then turned out to have a rather different motive for his 'anger' when the emails between himself and the local UKIP Group were published...

"John,

I have been special Forces. I am a very good friend but a very bad enemy.

If you stay on track, ignoring me, but trying to unseat my Ukip minded daughter I will take the story for the Echo, ref you do not want disabled candidates for Ukip.

This is not a threat but a promise.

This anti disability bit by Ukip will also probably go National in the press."

Uh-huh. So the poor wittle disabled chap was never actually denied his chance to be a candidate, and was actually just trying to blackmail his local UKIP Branch into giving his Tory offspring a free run...but of course I'm sure Ms Waters was completely unaware of the real story. Or that UKIP has, for example, fielded blind candidates in the past. The female half of the couple who used to pretty much singlehandedly run the New Forest West branch next door was in a wheelchair in fact, and stood as a candidate herself a while ago.

But let's not let the facts of a single incident that was actually an attempt at blackmail anyway get in the way of pretending that there is some kind of 'No Raspberry-Ripples' Policy in force within an enemy organisation. Verdict on Number Four: Lie, Big Fat.

Now, let's have fun with Number Five. Denying Climate Change - the heresy! The horror!

Well, once again whilst there is a very significant body within UKIP, including many of its representatives such as David Campbell-Bannerman (who had the dubious pleasure of being present when terror-supporter Caroline Lucas of the Greens uttered her most infamous statement yet), who believe that 'Global Warming is a myth' as he put it during the above-linked debate, once again Waters is confusing the opinions of members of a Party with Party Policy. UKIP as a political body does not 'deny climate change', voting at Conference to stay 'neutral' on the subject. Though I dearly wish they did, they don't.

Verdict on Number Five: A misrepresentation rather than an outright lie, but a forgviable one.

And so we turn to the greatest evidence of Waters' utter derangement, the smear of smears. The accusation that UKIP denies the Holocaust.

I was a UKIP member for a few years, a Constituency Chairman for two of those, and I'm still involved on the fringes. It has its fair share of kooks and nutters, to be sure, just like every Party. For example, one person I knew turned out to be a Truther and probably still isn't speaking to me after I verbally tore her a new one at a Cheese and Wine thingummy. But one thing I've never encountered there is any suggestion of anti-semitism. On the contrary, the local branches here seem to contain more than their fair share of Jewish members, in fact - including a good friend of mine who fought in the Sinai in 1967.

So can there be any basis at all for such an outrageous statement? Who is the 'Alistair McConnachie' mentioned by Waters? Well, the waste of space in question was an officer in UKIP Scotland in 2000 before showing himself to be a disciple of the revolting Fred Leuchter, a man who was the subject of a banning order from the UK a very long time before Geert Wilders, Michael Savage or any bearded Islamic crazy. Needless to say McConnachie wasn't an officer in UKIP Scotland for very long afterwards, and now rather amusingly runs his own minor Party - and you guessed it, he's now a Greenie in charge of 'Independent Green Voice' (no Party website, sadly).

So nine years ago a single nutball reveals his moonbattery and gets booted out of UKIP - and from that Waters extrapolates that UKIP - the Party - denies the Holocaust. Such a smear is so utterly vile that words cannot suffice to describe how much I'd like to punch this woman in the face, then tar and feather her before marching her through the streets of Dublin wearing a placard saying 'The Holocaust Is Not A Subject To Use For Cheap Political Gain'. Granted people are unlikely to see the small writing required, but it'd be worth it anyway.

Verdict on Number Six: I hope the bitch catches a highly amusing skin disease. Minimum.

One of the English language's most ill-used quotes is the one about patriotism being the last refuge of the scoundrel. In this case, faux patriotism and outrageous lies appear to be the only weapons the scoundrels of the Europhile movement have left.

Mummy's Wide Skirts

Once again, we have another one of those 'Riddle me this' questions. Let's say this time that (as I commented here) newly made BNP MEP Andrew Brons’ Brussels researcher was ‘exposed’ as having a history of going on NF marches calling Israel all sorts of names, such as an ‘apartheid state’. He might even have been kicked out of the Students Union for mimicking violence against ‘Zionists’. Anxious to preserve their thin veneer of respectability (don’t laugh) Brons fires him as the Internet clamour grows.

Would Harry's Place, so vigilant as they normally are in exposing and condemning racism in all forms including this one, agree to give that researcher a guest post spot to defend himself? Not a freakin chance! Yet now that 'Seph' Brown has been dismissed from his job with a Labour MP, he is being given a chance to blather on about how unfair it all is, and has even used it to single out all the people who 'persecuted' him during his time at University by racial group. It's all just one giant Jooooooooish Conspiracy you know!

I admire the editorial line of Harry's Place for the most part. Yet when faced with clear documentary evidence of racism and extremism, they just can't quite bring themselves to disown someone 'of the Left' for actions which would have brought universal editorial opprobrium had they been committed by anyone 'of the Right'.

Maybe that's why they have taken over so many of our institutions, and poisoned our culture so effectively. Because when it comes down to it, even basically decent Lefties are still willing to give the nutters the benefit of the doubt on grounds of their theoretical base ideology, and are united by that ideological bond. Whereas the Right is endlessly fractured along lines of moral and principle on individual issues and questions and absolutely refuses, often to its cost politically, to compromise and indulge in any but the tiniest amount of groupthink. When it does make serious attempts to (UKIP's endless infighting being an obvious example) the results are always similar to a ship being steered by five or six different people at the same time, with others constantly clamouring to be allowed to take the wheel because only they really know where the ship should be going.

I'm pretty sure I qualify as being 'of the Right', and I rather admire those who refuse to compromise their morals and principles for political expediency even when I disagree with those particular mores. But there are times when I do wistfully wonder what it would be like to be just a little bit more united against the bad guys...

And then I look at the "power for power's sake" Cameroonites and the 'proper' Left, and realise that actually, no, I'll go with the principled infighting, thanks.

Hey Buddy, Can You Spare Me A Parallel?

Via the Wide Awakes, what may well be a very familiar sounding tale to those of us who grew up with Derek Hatton and the infamous Militant Tendency in the 80's. For me the antics of the 'Loony Left' Labour local Councils and their 'nuclear free zones', councillors ranting about US smart bombs which were programmed only to target black people and complete inability to spend money on anything vaguely resembling essential services, were my first introduction to the true insanity of distilled Leftism, or Moonbattery as it is known in modern parlance.

Seems out in the good old US of A the Dems are having similar issues...

"The following account is most likely playing out across the country – especially in small rural communities. My source has asked me to keep silent until after the elections are over. Tomorrow I will reveal more of this story. But for now, suffice it to say that activists Democrats are quietly taking over the party and silently eliminating duly elected local party chairs by very unscrupulous and possibly illegal means."

Its called Entryism. The British Left is fantastic at it. Hell, they dont just restrict it to local parties, they have used it to infiltrate just about every TV newsroom in Britain...

"In comes a new party volunteer that offers to help get the local party online with a new web site. The local party is delighted. Donations come in, money is spent finding a good web site developer, and the local party web site goes online.

The helpful new volunteer offers to act as web administrator. The country chair is delighted. But little by little, the new web administrator takes more and more liberties and begins to publish “news articles” that are filled with questionable inflammatory opinions. The party chair asks the new volunteer to cease these activities. But the new volunteer refuses. Then the party chair is forced to remove the new volunteer as web administrator."

Its Militant all over again, updated for the Internet age...go read the whole thing, and if like me you remember well this stuff happening in the UK twenty years ago it will send a shiver down your spine...

Liking Her Already

A new writer at A Tangled Web. She has got Frank 'Im not a Leftist' O'Dwyer already champing at the bit because she dared to describe herself as a conservative in the comments to her first post. Definitely going to be worth a read in the future...

Just So We're Clear About Which Side I'M On

This is extremely painful viewing, I warn you now. Despite my usual loathing of people such as the woman in this video who have suddenly woken up to the wrongness of their actions, even my stony heart was somewhat moved by her obvious guilt and shame.

Possibly the worst part is the group of Pali kids sitting with the toy guns boasting of their desire to kill Jews. Palestinian child abuse, nothing less.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is simply wrong.

Why Is There Never One Of Those Surgical Strike Thingies Around When You Need One? (Warning: Extreme Rant)

Seriously.

Just think of how many of Britain's problems could have been solved in one stroke. Seeing as its only a 'tiny minority of extremists' anyway, we could have got rid of a huge percentage of the problem with one sweet little flight of jets. All those cunts in Hezbollah shirts declaring how they are 'Victorious', all the pieces of shit who think wearing Palestinian bandanas is cool and radically chic, in fact every single one of the scum who turned the perfectly reasonable sentiment of 'Fuck Off Mr Blair, Your Time Is Up' into an anti-semitic, pro-terrorism hatefest.

My favourite is the smug little shit standing in front of the Respect banner which is laughably subtitled 'Peace Justice Equality'. Holding a T-shirt with the Hezbollah symbol on it.

Come to Christchurch you bunch of utter, utter cunts. Come here and I'll fucking take you down altogether or one at a time. I don't give a fuck how many of you there are, I'll leave every single one of you bleeding if it takes me all day. Muslims, Respect, Greens, Communists, Southampton Socialists (your only up the road, maybe I'll come and pay you a visit you motherfuckers), StopTheWar (as long as it isnt the one against Jews, right?), Socialist Workers, I dont care. I'll put every single one of you on the floor and smear pigfat all over your faces with my Size Eights.

This is my fucking Jihad, and it tastes good.

(Rant Ends, normal slightly more restrained service will be resumed when I calm down a bit.)

Peace Activists In Their Natural Habitat

I have always maintained that scum like Christian 'Peace'Makers and the International Solidarity Movement are not peace protesters and are in fact simply supporters of those who war against our society. Normally I'd expect to have to make a fairly detailed argument such as this one to defend that position, but sometimes life just throws you a gift you can't pass up...I have to be honest and admit that I often dont read the Frontpage articles which pass in front of me despite being on their daily mailing list, because they are often far too lengthy and convoluted for a simple soul like me. This one however I thoroughly recommend.

So without further ado...I give you the peace-loving activists of the International Solidarity Movement, who are absolutely to be trusted when they are telling us how it is the Israelis who are the violent ones. Honest.

STOP THE ISM.

We're Not Good Enough To Deserve The Left

Apparently.

So says our '9/11 protester', informing us that:

"I’m absolutely sure that there were good people that died in the towers, and not all evil hateful monsters like those there yesterday pretending to mourn. I dedicate my protest to any good person that died in the buildings, but it’s sad to say, those people I encountered yesterday in mass, are not worth protesting for. Next time they’re government kills them, I might just stay home and be quiet."

That'd be nice. And when you're next lecturing us about our racism in targeting people of Middle Eastern appearance with bushy beards and big coats you could slip a suicide bomb under, just remember these immortal words:

"Some Jew looking dude in a suit came up to me and asked “where are you from?” I said “PA”, and he said “you should go back to PA, asshole” and walked away. It took me by suprise, and I started laughing, I thought about saying “you should go back to Israel.”

'Some Jew-lookin dude' ?!?!?

Little Green Footballs has reprinted the whole thing, complete with casual anti-semitism, bad grammar and cognitive dissonance. Read it all, then decide whether laughing or crying is a better option.

Sorry, Didnt You All Get The 'Jews Control The Media' Memo?

I'm confused. The Arabs, the neo-Nazis and the Jew-hating Left usually tell us how Israel controls the worldwide media, so how come these rich Arabs think they can buy themselves biased coverage just by, you know, buying themselves biased coverage? Dammit people, didnt you get the memo?

The Collateral Damage Of The Christ

(Not as punchy a title as, say Mel 'Its the Jooz Fault Officer' Gibson might have come up with, but what the hell...)

On BCBBC News...

"Church Leaders, the United Nations and senior Labour MPs tonight have expressed their opposition to continued Christian aggression against idolaters, panderers and usurers in what will become Occupied Palestine. Far-Right Fundamentalist Christian extremist Jesus Christ attacked a temple with indiscriminate use of whips and possibly even chemical weapons, causing enormous collateral damage to the peaceful inhabitants."

You think I'm being totaly surreal? No, I'm not a proper surrealist (well, except when I'm playing with my nine-year old and her Barbarian Baby Bears but that's another story), just a sarcastic rightwinger who likes ripping it out of the Left, particularly its ecclesiastical arm known as the CofE. This guy however, a Canon of the Church of England, is actually being SERIOUS.

"We cannot simply ignore the violent passion of Jesus cleansing the temple with whips. We are never told of the collateral damage possibly resulting from his action ..."

(via Laban Tall)

A Perfect Example...

...of a Leftist Jew-hater. Go and read the thoughts of 'Cunningham' on that good old canard, the influence of Jewish (*cough, cough*, sorry, 'Israeli') 'interests' on American foreign policy. There are such gems as the one below on Ahmadinejihad, and doubtless will be more once he reads my, erm, blunt reply:

"Ahmadinejad is mad, bad and dangerous. But he was elected in a more or less democratic process, and there is no easy way to get rid of him."

You have to ask yourself what colour the sky is in this idiot's world. Purple perhaps. But the real thrust of his comment becomes very clear right at the end:

"The US, and the world, is therefore now dependent on the good-old UN. This loss of clout is all a result of the mismanagement by the present US administration, and specifically of its eagerness to tie its middle-east policy to Israel’s self-interest."

Yep, its ZOG and the Vast Zionist Conspiracy all over again. Our Middle-East expert Cunningham informs us that the US didnt invade Afghanistan because it was pursuing the people who killed thousands of its citizens on 9/11, presumably that was just a smokescreen - actually the Jews told them to do it! And Iraq? Yep, 'Israeli self-interest' again apparently.

I'd love to know what exactly it is Cunningham and his fellow Jew-haters believe Israel actually GETS out of all this supposed influence on US Foreign Policy. What possible interest of Israel's has been served by either the invasion of Iraq or that of Afghanistan? By Condi 's cosying up to every Muslim she can lay her hands on, bless her Dhimmi heart? By the US agreeing to try and force Israel to accept a ceasfire which it is obvious is worth absolutely nothing to her?

But there is no interest being served of course. The Leftist horror at the thought of any Government standing up to the savagery of Islamic terrorism is only explicable to them provided that somewhere behind it all must be a Jew pulling the strings - after all, the Left has no problem with the Jews being 'wiped off the map' if it appeases Islam, so naturally if anyone else does it must all be a 'conspiracy', mustnt it?

The thought that anyone might stand up for Israel because they think its the right thing to do just never enters their morally bankrupt little minds.

Israel