Mummy's Wide Skirts

Once again, we have another one of those 'Riddle me this' questions. Let's say this time that (as I commented here) newly made BNP MEP Andrew Brons’ Brussels researcher was ‘exposed’ as having a history of going on NF marches calling Israel all sorts of names, such as an ‘apartheid state’. He might even have been kicked out of the Students Union for mimicking violence against ‘Zionists’. Anxious to preserve their thin veneer of respectability (don’t laugh) Brons fires him as the Internet clamour grows.

Would Harry's Place, so vigilant as they normally are in exposing and condemning racism in all forms including this one, agree to give that researcher a guest post spot to defend himself? Not a freakin chance! Yet now that 'Seph' Brown has been dismissed from his job with a Labour MP, he is being given a chance to blather on about how unfair it all is, and has even used it to single out all the people who 'persecuted' him during his time at University by racial group. It's all just one giant Jooooooooish Conspiracy you know!

I admire the editorial line of Harry's Place for the most part. Yet when faced with clear documentary evidence of racism and extremism, they just can't quite bring themselves to disown someone 'of the Left' for actions which would have brought universal editorial opprobrium had they been committed by anyone 'of the Right'.

Maybe that's why they have taken over so many of our institutions, and poisoned our culture so effectively. Because when it comes down to it, even basically decent Lefties are still willing to give the nutters the benefit of the doubt on grounds of their theoretical base ideology, and are united by that ideological bond. Whereas the Right is endlessly fractured along lines of moral and principle on individual issues and questions and absolutely refuses, often to its cost politically, to compromise and indulge in any but the tiniest amount of groupthink. When it does make serious attempts to (UKIP's endless infighting being an obvious example) the results are always similar to a ship being steered by five or six different people at the same time, with others constantly clamouring to be allowed to take the wheel because only they really know where the ship should be going.

I'm pretty sure I qualify as being 'of the Right', and I rather admire those who refuse to compromise their morals and principles for political expediency even when I disagree with those particular mores. But there are times when I do wistfully wonder what it would be like to be just a little bit more united against the bad guys...

And then I look at the "power for power's sake" Cameroonites and the 'proper' Left, and realise that actually, no, I'll go with the principled infighting, thanks.

Hey, No Worries, Its Just Legitimate Criticism Of Israel, Right?

...or not. S'funny though when you think about it. A swastika-waving Neo-Nazi group produces a leaflet saying that if you join the US Army you are fighting for Israel and features a stereotypical bignosed Jew giving orders to a US soldier...this would no doubt be called anti-semitic in nature by all but the most rabid of commentators. And yet...

Waving flags of organisations dedicated to killing Jews and destroying Israel at a Leftist rally? That's 'showing solidarity with the poor oppressed Palestinians'.

Waving banners calling Jews 'Zionist pigs' with fanged demons wearing Israeli skullcaps in the background at a Leftist? 'Legitimate criticism'.

'No blood for Israel' signs at a Leftwing rally? 'Hey, that's because, you know, Israel, you know, leaned on the US somehow to invade Iraq, right? We have absolutely no proof of this but, well what about AIPAC and the Jewish, whoops, sorry Zionist lobby?'

Let me repeat, all these messages are Leftwing messages, found at every so-called 'antiwar' rally, found on every Leftist Blog such as the increasingly vile and more importantly openly anti-Jewish Daily Kos. Leftist opinion journals like Counterpunch carry this kind of material constantly...here's a subtle and tasty quote which puts me in mind of a cockroach running for the darkness at the mere thought of having the light shined on it...this is how Counterpunch writer
Arthur Neslen feels about the latest report (not suppressed this time thankfully) on anti-semitism from the EU.

'Anti-Semitism', its report began, 'is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred'. Such a perception could include stereotypical or dehumanising libels about, for example: "The power of Jews as a collective - such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions."

But it could also include a litany of lobbyist shibboleths, such as:

"Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination (e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor); Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation... Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis; Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel."

Uh-huh. So whilst he wouldnt dream of thinking of himself as an anti-Semite, Neslen feels that claiming the very existence of Israel is racist and that its actions are comparable to Nazism is legitimate criticism. Expecting Israel to behave to a totally different standard of behaviour than every other nation? Not at all unreasonable! Collective responsibility (hmmm, where have we heard that one before, could it be from Leftists like Neslen whining that the security fence which has so drastically reduced terror attacks on Israeli soil is 'collective punishment' for the Palestinians?) ? Perfectly fine and dandy - as long as it is only applied to the Jews.

Ironically, Neslen claims himself (without evidence of course) to have been a victim of anti-semitism from...you guessed it, the BNP! Who he then goes on to mention (broadly) supported Israel's efforts against Hezbollah in Lebanon - you'd think that might be food for thought for someone who is 'definitely not an anti-semite' but most definitely didnt express the same support for anyone but Hezbollah themselves...

Its when Neslen comments on Palestinian anti-semitism though, that his true colours really show through.

"Certainly, some Palestinians talk about 'Yehuds' in a derogatory fashion, cite libellous texts without forethought and make foolish statements about the Holocaust. But that's what happens to language when you step on someone's throat."

'A derogatory fashion'?!? Palestinian schools feature literature, teaching and posters with subtle and tasty quotes such as 'Killing a Jew brings you closer to God'. Libellous texts? Well, after the Koran, Mein Kampf is currently the bestselling book in the Arab world. And the PA is currently run by Mahmoud Abbas, a man whose doctoral thesis was, you guessed it, a denial of the Holocaust.

What kind of person can interpret the undeniably genocidal nature of the Palestinian attitude to Jews as 'talking about them in a derogatory fashion'? Only one kind, the same kind that genuinely believes that Israel is 'stepping on Palestinian throats' by protecting itself and that claiming the very existence of the world's only Jewish State is racist is perfectly legitimate.

At least the people who distributed the literature in Berkeley are honest about their racism and their hatred. The anti-semites of the Left dont even have that to commend them.

(Cross-posted at A Tangled Web)

Pot Condems Kettle Excesses

(Seen and sniggered at over at Harry's Place...)

"Too much focus on difference can spill over into separateness, which subverts an appreciation of our common humanity and undermines notions of universal rights and equal citizenship. It can produce a new form of tribalism, where societies are fragmented into myriad communities, each loyal primarily to itself and with little interest in the common good of society as a whole."

Actually quite sensible words really. A better condemnation of the excesses of multiculturalism is rarely to be found. Quite ironic that its coming from this man really.

So, let me get this straight, this is *Peter Tatchell* bemoaning the forming of individual communities loyal only to themselves and pursuing nothing but their own selfish agendas at the expense of the feelings, rights and needs of the rest of society.

Bwahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

You Just Keep Doing It To Yourselves

I upset a few people a while ago when I explained why I wouldnt vote BNP. See, I respect this guy. Often disagree with him, but he doesnt use offensive language, and genuinely believes that his BNP support is correct and I know from correspondence that he is not a racist in the 'whites are better than everyone else' sense. Simple, clear statements like this cant really be argued with...

But then we have other 'BNP Bloggers' like this. The first post is a good one about the political corruption of the media, albeit couched in fairly blunt terms. The second is about the whining of Black PC PCs about a white PC being awarded compensation for being smeared over the the investigation into the Muslim Inspector who sent his mistress death threats by text message, amongst other things, and is now national news because he was one of seven applicants rejected for a job that - the horror! - a white officer got.

The third is a curious verbatim reprint of a report which seems at first to say that ASLEF couldnt expel a BNP member but when you get to the end actualy seems to uphold that they could? A weird one, methinks that the original source (the Times) has got somewhat confused? Or is just me?

See, it goes on and all looks OK. Cameron/Mercer, the repeating of the stats about the rising and totally disproportionate incidence of Islamic rapes in Scandinavian cities, all in all not all that different from my own Blog in some ways. It seems that what we have here is just another white guy who's had enough of the hypocrisy of racist Black and Muslims organisations and the Government in treating whites as inferiors and then calling them racist.

And then I got to this post, which was responded to by 'Serendib' who seems to be a member/advocate of one of those Black organisations. And the guy's true colours (if you'll excuse the pun) suddenly come out...

The title pretty much covers it I suppose - 'A Black Trying To Ape Intelligence, LOL'.

Charming. Our respectable BNP Blogger then informs Serendib that:

"The only Anti-Fascist organisation I know of is the BNP, unless you include the NF and Combat 18 (the latter will probably be tracing your whereabouts via the IP address every visitor to this blog leaves on my site meter, which is 86.142.164 and places you in Salcott, Norfolk".

Riiiiiight. So the National Front and Combat 18 are 'anti-fascists'. And our respectable BNP Blogger thinks its cool to boast about being in cahoots with Combat 18, the inept but still extremely nasty wannabe paramilitary Nazi group who skulk around Britain's Nazi Skinhead music scene.

Serendib tongue-in-cheek offers to help our BNP man compile his list of racist Black organisations by telling him that there is a list as long as his collective arms. Our BNP man informs him that he should realise that 'monkeys have longer arms than humans' and that if he doesnt understand the purpose of compiling a list of such organisations he should get a white friend to read them to him.

So, Combat 18 is cool. Blacks are monkeys. Blacks cant read. There's more, but you get the point. He's even popped over here and then strutted about his site's higher hit count which did make me grin.

Yeah maybe asking him to find a black friend to read the posts to him where it shows I took a long Blogging break and therefore am only just back up and running was a bit mean, but hey, a big tough guy with friends in C18 ought to be able to take it on the chin...

One To File Under 'Vested Interests'...

A former ACLU (that's the American Civil Liberties Union for the uninitiated) State Chapter head has been arrested on what seems like pretty solid Child Porn charges. Charles Rust-Tierney has, in the past, argued for amongst other things, unlimited access to the Internet in public libraries because “recognizing that individuals will continue to behave responsibly and appropriately while in the library, the default should be maximum, unrestricted access to the valuable resources of the Internet.”

Uh huh.

The ACLU has in the past been in what would, for any organisation not on the Left and therefore MSM protected, an unenviable position. Namely that of arguing the case that in the name of Civil Liberties whilst Child Porn should of course be regarded as beyond the pale and illegal, distributing it shouldnt be because, well, Civil Liberties demand freedom of 'information' and all that jazz.

As legislative counsel for the ACLU in 1985, Barry Lynn told the U.S. Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography (of which Focus on the Family President Dr. James C. Dobson was a member) that child pornography was protected by the First Amendment. While production of child porn could be prevented by law, he argued, its distribution could not be. A few years later (1988), Lynn told the Senate Judiciary Committee that even requiring porn producers to maintain records of their performers’ ages was impermissible.
“If there is no federal record-keeping requirement for the people portrayed in Road and Track or Star Wars,” he said, “there can be no such requirement for Hustler or Debbie Does Dallas.

Oh dear oh dear oh dear.

The Anti-Capitalists Defend Indefensible Capitalism

Seriously. If there ever was a true case of capitalism gone wild and intruding where it really shouldnt, its the grotesque and bizarre practice of 'buying carbon credits' instead of, you know, not producing the carbon emissions in the first place. But, it seems, the Lefties at Tangled Web are all for this particular brand of capitalism, you know, under certain circumstances.

No prizes for guessing which circumstances folks...

"Brothers, sisters and politicians! If, perchance, you were left feeling slightly (or even mightily) perturbed, vexed and distempered by the revelations that The Prophet Al Gore's personal gas and 'leccy bills are just a tad on the heavy side, quite out of step with his great and holy prophetic utterances of immutable Truth (All repeat: "Truth!") about our impending doom... (All repeat: "Doom!") and if, as a result of your disquiet in the light of these exceedingly sour and bilious revelations, you sought to reassure yourself that said revelations were in fact untrue, or exaggerated, or indeed (whisper!) the work of Xoxxogoth (that damnable agent of slander, libel, defamation and heresy, father of all deniers of global warming Truth (All repeat: "Truth!") and bringer of foul-odoured gastric indisposition at the most embarrassing of moments)....then Lo! Fear not, but cease thy procrastinations at once, O faithful one, and be thou refreshéd* and calméd!* Remember no more, neither call unto thy mind in any wise, how these revelations caused you at first to stumble in The Faith (All repeat: "The Faith!") but let thy trust in the great Prophet Gore be once more restored unto completion!"

I think Tom Tyler's been watching too many evengalical videos myself...though there's definitely a bit of Lovecraftian style in there too...good man.

Beirut, Best Place In The World You Know

Apparently women in Beirut know 'how to present themselves properly' and not look like 'ladies of the evening' in their 501's. They certainly arent perpetuating racist stereotypes of black men by posting their pictures on the Internet after being sexually assaulted by them. Presumably they also dont get assaulted by scum like the one Jackie Danicki describes, being too busy dodging crowds of Hezbollah supporters (what exactly did that scumbag Siniora expect after spending the entire Israel-Lebanon conflict praising Hezbollah and calling them heroic martrys?) and pieces of Cabinet Minister.

Some of the comments on the poor woman's post make you want to weep, they really do.

Women and Gays, Know Your Place! But Its OK, They're Cool With It...

Well, that didnt take long, did it? The voices in the Muslim community very fearfully raised in opposition to Sheikh 'Stay In The Bedroom Or You Deserve To Be Raped' Hilali's comments that women 'deserve it' have gone from actual, you know, mild condemnation, to...

The Muslim Women's Association, which first admitted to being "shocked" by Hilaly's sermon, now said he was "very good to all Muslim women". Said founding president Aziz El Saddik: "Those who say bad things about him, they have very bad manners."

This is Cholmondley-Warner territory here, 'pieces of uncovered meat' and gentlemen. If Cholmondley-Warner beat his wife and filipino maidservant to keep them in line, thought gang-rape rather than social ostracisation was the best method of keeping women in the bedroom and wore a beard instead of a dinner jacket, anyway.

As Andrew Bolt points out in his excellent article about the way 5000 adoring Muslims greeted the Sheikh after his faked episode 'like a rock star', it is clear that this is no 'tiny minority of extremists' moment. 5000 Australian Muslims do not turn out to greet a man who has said women who step outside of the bedroom without a hijab invite gang rape because of US foreign policy in Iraq. They do it because grotesque, misogynistic savages like Al-Hilali have their support because they agree with his views. No other reason.

Dumbjon also points out the appalling silence of the British Left on this issue. As he says, there were moonbat screams from the rooftop when UKIP's wittiest raconteur Godfrey Bloom made his famous 'cleaning behind the fridge' joke (which did give your writer the chance to make the UKIP Conference giggle by yelling out "He's finishing off behind the fridge" when he was late on stage for his speech that year) it was as if someone had threatened to boil their favourite puppies alive.

But now...now there is as usual a deafening silence when its someone on the darker side of pale saying something which on a relative scale would in any sane moral universe cause approximately 100,000,000 times the outrage. In fact for that matter the Gay Rights lobby has been curiously restrained after something similar in recent weeks over here as well...

"He told me that in a true Islamic state, such punishments were part of Islam: if the person had had a trial, at which four witnesses testified that they had seen the actual homosexual acts. It is part of the central tenets of Islam: that sex outside marriage is forbidden; this is stated in the Koran and the prophet Mohammed had stated that these punishments were due to such behaviours,'" the Imam is alleged to have told Dr Casson.

The punishment in question being execution. Now in a country where Christians are put inside a cell for handing out leaflets saying they think homosexuality is, you know, a bit wrong, you'd think the Gay Rights Brigade would feel bold enough to call for some kind of action on the part of the authorities?

Nah.

Peter Tatchell, of gay rights group OutRage!, said he was disturbed that British Islamic clergy would endorse the executions of gay and lesbian Muslims:"Muslim and gay people know the pain of prejudice and discrimination. We should be working together to challenge homophobia and Islamophobia. I hope liberal Muslims will speak out in defence of the human rights of lesbians and gay men," he said.

Good God. This guy says that Tatchell and everyone like him should be in the ground, and the best he can manage is 'disturbed'. Whilst reaching out to confirm his ongoing support for the religion which thinks he should be dead. Unbelievable.

Looks like where Islam is concerned, women and gays really do know their place. Mr. Cholmondley-Warner would be so proud...

A Tale Of Two Fundamentalists

Yep, just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water...you can trust some senior member of the Religion of Peace to open his bearded mouth and explain how yet another group of people in the world deserve what they get, even if what they are getting from his followers is extreme violence and in this case rape and sexual assault.

While not specifically referring to the rapes, brutal attacks on four women for which a group of young Lebanese men received long jail sentences, Sheik Hilali said there were women who "sway suggestively" and wore make-up and immodest dress ... "and then you get a judge without mercy (rahma) and gives you 65 years".

The 'merciless' sentence in the Bilal Skaf case that Hilali refers to (which became a byword of what passes for Islamic humour to the Muslims of Cronulla, as in the funnies of surrounding a bikini-clad bather and commenting loudly how she 'might just be worth 55 years' in that Peaceful way we know and love) took place immediately before the renewed attacks on lifeguards that sparked the Cronulla riots in suburban Sydney, where years of gang rapes, sexual assaults, harassment and violence by 'youths of a certain ethnic origin' culminated in 5000 jackboot clad neo-Nazis apparently materialising out of thin air and chasing off their tormentors whilst chanting paeans to Hitler. Or for those of us not choosing to accept the MSM's version, the local population of all races, nationalities and creeds except that certain origin came together for once and took back the beaches their Police had given up on policing.

The senior member of the RoP speaking those words in this case is one Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali, Australia's senior 'mufti' or religious leader. Just to make sure we dont mistake his inference about immodestly dressed women for something as gentle as mild sexism, he goes for broke and makes it clear that his is the kind of misogyny most of us gave up around the 7th Century. Ah, wait, I knew there was a clue there...

"If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?

"The uncovered meat is the problem."

The sheik then said: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."

He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.

"It is said in the state of zina (adultery), the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)."

Now granted to some of his congregation may feel about as obligated to listen to him as British Protestants do to Rowan 'medals from terrorists' Williams, but none of the 500-strong congregation seems to have felt the need to dissent all that loudly. And we know, because the sermon during which he made the comments was recorded, that the usual accusations of Zionost plots and the like dont really work in this case...

Its funny though. When he does realise he is being recorded, the mufti's attitude towards women seems rather different...

Revelation of the mufti's comments comes after he criticised Mr Howard last month in The Australian for saying a minority of migrant men mistreated their women. Sheik Hilali said such a minority was found in all faiths. "Those who don't respect their women are not true Muslims."

"There's a small percentage found among all religions, but we don't recognise ours as Muslims."

Oopsy. So when the cameras are rolling, wife-beaters, gang-rapists and misogyny are beyond the pale and so their perpetrators. But when he is 'amongst friends'...let's just go over that again shall we?

He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.

Which, in the interests of balance, brings us to Fundamentalist Number 2.

I wonder if Julie Bindel will be jumping all over this story the same way she does other aspects of the crime of rape...somehow I find it in me to doubt it. From her despicable utterances in the Guardian (where else?) article that the Humble Devil uncovered (and characteristically I see he is all over this story as well) I would guess not. After all the assertion that mobile phone footage of an alleged rape victim masturbating and giving head to one of her alleged attackers is merely "evidence" as opposed to, you know, Evidence, would seem to indicate that she is not a woman prepared to believe anything as flimsy as the things people actually do and say.

"If more cases such as Shabnam's occur, we may as well forget about the criminal justice system and train groups of vigilantes to exact revenge and, hopefully, deter attacks."

Riiiiight. So here's a misogynist arguing that women who step outside of the bedroom wearing anything but full body armour are 'uncovered meat', and a misandrist arguing that gangs of Amazonian harridans should patrol the streets with torches and pitchforks searching for anyone insane enough to give them a wink.

No, no fundamentalism at all on this issue then.

UPDATE: Via an email from Daydreamer of Oz, we have Al-Beeb's reaction to this story. And sure enough, rather than being a strident condemnation of excusal of and near-incitiement to gang rape, it is instead yet another tale of Islamic victimhood.

"Australia's Muslims Fear Backlash."

You really just could not make this up.

BREAKING NEWS: The swine has stepped down after collapsing under mysterious circumstances.

He was due to meet Tom Zreika, the president of the Lebanese Muslim Association, to discuss calls for his resignation, but fell ill during talks.

Interesting wording there, no? If he hadnt met Zreika yet, who was he 'talking' with when he 'fell ill'? I don't think we've heard the last of this one yet somehow...

From The Presumption Of Innocence To The Assumption Of Guilt

No, this time I am definitely not talking about the EU's recent attempt to shift us to the Napoleonic Code of Corpus Juris, as many other Bloggers and even MSM publicity have managed to cover that topic fairly adequately lately. I did call a couple of Tories waving about a petition about the NHS traitors the other day though so consider that anecdote to be a small sideswipe at the issue.

What DSD wishes to do today is go for that favoured target of his, hypocrisy. And today's lesson, boys and girls, is that old lesson of 'how dare you assume one of US is guilty' screamed from the rooftops until one of them rather than one of 'us' is in the frame for the same kind of thing.

Then, its a different story.

Hang 'em from the lampposts.

And whatever you do, tar and feather the entire BNP with the same brush that mustn't ever, ever be used on Muslims.

My favourite bit is that its a 'record haul of chemicals' - the only evidence for which assertion is that some silly bastard from that well-known organ of journalistic high excellence, Pendle Today, said it was. But this ridiculous lie is shooting around the Leftist blogs like a meteor without any questioning whatsoever because it's very convenient to imagine a huge media blackout descending in Orwellian fashion over the media, always SO friendly to the BNP, lol!

I'm sure some Blogger, somewhere, is blaming the Zionists for not letting the media report on the nefariousness of the Nazis. Er.

So, let's see. Lies? Well, from all sides actually. It seems that the BNP's quickest available local Councillor obviously doesnt think on his feet very well when trying to lie through his teeth to the Press.

Nelson BNP councillor Brian Parkinson said: "I am very shocked and surprised to hear this. I am glad to hear that he is no longer a member of our party because the BNP wouldn't want to be associated with this incident. It certainly wouldn't condone the sort of thing he is allegedly being connected with."

Oopsy. Membership runs from January 1st to december 31st and he stood for you in May? So that means all those 'Ex-BNP man' headlines will now be reworked and another angle added to a hugely embarassing incident for the Party.

Prat. Just handed 'the enemy' a perfect, easy to spot coverup on a plate didnt you? No Cabinet post for you, sunshine.

This pair of Nazi muppets deserve to have the book thrown at them for two reasons if they turn out to be as guilty as they seem to appear. Firstly because if they were intending some kind of terrorist attack (and the fuckwit PC PC who says there are 'not terrorists' just because they were apparently acting alone is wrong) then that's unconscionable.

Secondly because this will now give enormous ammunition to the pro-Islamic Leftists who scweam and scweam and scweam about Timothy McVeigh the 'Christian terrorist' (not that I recall any evidence as to McVeigh having religious inclinations of any kind, but what they really mean anyway is 'white guy') and will now no doubt do the same with these two fucking idiots. So thanks a lot, though I suppose it will be nice to have a little bit of variety in the terror sympathisers whinings about the tiny number of white, oops sorry 'Christian' terrorists as opposed to the serried ranks of Jihadis screaming 'death to everyone'.

And to whichever BNP Regional Organiser or other official failed to vet this nutball properly (or at all!) do yourself a favour and resign now. Unlike Respect or Sinn Fein, terrorism should NOT be a valued tick on a potential officeholder's CV for the BNP - the fact that lunatics with biowarfare suits end up on your roster is yet more proof that your Party is still full of the kind of trash that makes it remain totally unelectable.

(UPDATE or perhaps more of a PS for those who may still come across this post, out of date though it is - does a 'former Green Party Candidate and committed pacifist ' getting eight months for GBH (and no you really couldnt make up "he's a committed pacifist m'lud" as a defence in a GBH trial up, could you?) mean that all Green Party members are mindless thugs who will snap at the slightest provocation? - Hat Tip to Little Bulldogs)

How Do You Know When A Tory Eurosceptic Is Lying?

His mouth is open.

I have finally had enough of the Tories. Just enough. At least Labour and the Libarab Democrats are honest about their prejudices and their hatred for our country, its culture and institutions. They are honest about their support of bloated statism, bureaucracy and drip-drip tyranny in the shape of the EU. And in Labour's case a succession of supposed anti-terrorism and anti-hate speech laws under which guise the white Britain on the street can be scooped up and safely squared away for looking funny at anyone on the darker side of pale (unless they're Jewish, that's an exemption because, you know, those nasty old Joooz have just brought it on themselves by being so horrible to terrorists and their supporters) but under which Muslims can publicly call for mass murder on national television and have 'no case to answer'.

But the Tories? Well the Tories of Blu-Labour dont think we have gone far enough in our appeasement. For example, here is the insane case of the Muslim Armed Police Officer who was excused from guarding Jews on the grounds that, well, he doesnt like Jews very much so how could he honestly be expected to protect them from being blown up? Now the reaction of most people except the real moonbats has been to condemn this without qualification, as you would expect - especially when you consider that BNP members are not allowed in the Met as they apparently cannot be trusted to act without favouritism!

But just when you think that for a change here is a case all the parties can more or less agree is pretty cut and dried...here come the Tories to place themselves even further to the moonbat Left than the Labour Party.

Richard Barnes, a Tory member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, accused senior officers of lacking tact. He said: ‘I think it was crass management in the first place. They should have recognised there could have been a problem and not suggested this officer be posted at this embassy.’
‘The Met keep banging on about diversity, but this case shows they have learned very little at all.’

Listen to me Barnes, you motherfucker. If there is any good in this bullshit idea of 'Diversity', its the idea that while we are all different, we should all be treated the same way, by people on the street, and most especially by public institutions and those who serve in them. What 'Diversity' is NOT, and never should be except in your Cameron-coloured world, is an excuse for those public servants to pick and choose who they wish to serve, and in this case protect.

The Tory Party has purely and simply endorsed racism here. The idea that any public servant is free to make moral judgments and then decide to exclude their service from those they deem unfit, immoral or evil for that service is a truly disgusting and pernicious one.

'I got mugged last week, and my mum last year. So I'm not serving you in this Post Office cos you're black and so were the muggers.'

'So what if someone ripped off your veil and spat in your eye? I may be a copper but I dont like Muslims, I was on a tube train on 7/7.'

'No, I'm not letting you through the ticket barrier - you're obviously a Sikh judging by that turban, and Sikhs killed the Prime Minister back in India, the bastards. As a good Hindu I reserve the right not to let you on the train.'

'No way son, I know this is a youth club for everyone but well, you have to understand that as a Jew I feel you bear some responsibility for what is happening to the Palestinians. So you're not getting in.'

Are we getting the picture now Barnes, you piece of shit? I hope you have a heart attack and then the attending ambulancemen see your little blue rosette and decide to leave you gasping by the wayside on the grounds that they vote Labour and can't stand Tories, or hey maybe they could even be Muslims who just gosh darn it HATE WHITE BRITISH MEN.

Goddamn it I hate the Conservative Party v.2006 so very, very much.

Britain's Muslims Are All Potential Terrorists, by the Muslim Council of Britain

From the horse's goddamned mouth. Funny how when we say it we are Islamophobes and racists, but when the grandly named Secretary-General of the Muslim Council of Britain actually makes a specific and explicit threat that it is going to happen if we dont do what we're told, then does this mean those of us who have said before are no longer Islamophobes but actually spreading the word of the MCB on Allah's behalf?

Can we call Dr Bari (successor to Iqbal 'hang the homos' Sacranie) an Islamophobe now for these wonderfully illuminating words?

"But some police officers and sections of the media are demonising Muslims, treating them as if they're all terrorists — and that encourages other people to do the same. If that demonisation continues, then Britain will have to deal with two million Muslim terrorists — 700,000 of them in London," he said. "If you attack a whole community, it becomes despondent and aggressive."

Dyu know old bean, you're right. When you attack a whole community indiscriminately, it does usually react rather badly. But unlike the Muslim 'community', the community that is the rest of Britain (black, white, brown, yellow, atheist, Christian, Sikh, Jewish, Hindu) hasnt responded to being attacked physically on 7/7 by becoming aggressive. No British mosques are being torched or bombed, no lynch mobs are surging through the streets with nooses at the ready to hang the first burqa-clad female they see. It simply isnt happening.

In fact instead of whining endlessly about racism, demonisation and Islamophobic persecution, the Muslim community of Britain ought to be down on its collective knees thanking Allah that this country is the way it is. That despite the provocation of murder and mayhem, of crowds calling for the beheading of those opposed to their religion, of people like Doctor Bari threatening terrorism if his host nation doesnt toe the line of Dhimmitude he wants it to, the community that is Britain is failing to follow the same route he says his 'community' is going to if his 'community' doesnt do what we want it to.

Which is to stop whining, stop threatening, stop obstructing the police, stop attempting to force us to follow somebody else's religious laws and instead start supporting us to root out those in his community's midst who think that terrorism is the way to get what you want.

Save The Children - Officially Judenfrei

Via Stephen Pollard, it seems that Save The Children are now taking their 'impartial charity work' to a rather different place. Yes, Save The Children has made itself, by its own admission, officially Judenfrei. The reason? No, not that they are choosing to emote over Arabs rather than those pesky Jooooz who cause all these 'humanitarian crises' by refusing to allow people to murder their civilians at will, but because 'Israel has systems in place' to deal with such matters as dozens of Katyusha and Qassam rockets being fired into their cities at random.

The message? Its OK to violently target children of 'certain' religions in 'certain' countries as long as they have 'systems' in place - but not others. Oh, wait - apparently the UK doesnt have 'systems' in place either, in fact there only seems to be one country where children regularly suffer 'dislocation' as a result of violence which does have these vaunted systems in place which exclude it from receiving Save The Children's largesse.

There is only one word for this, and its not one I like to use unless its clearly justified because it is probably the most overused one in the English language. But this is racism, in the clearest possible sense of the word, and should consign Save The Children to the evergrowing list of Leftist NGO's with an anti-Jewish and pro-Terrorism agenda which all of us should boycott forthwith.