Thursday, November 16, 2006
Monday, October 30, 2006
The Naked Jew-Hatred Of Al-Beeb
Here's the plot, right?
Islamic Terrorists storm into an Embassy, hold the people inside it hostage, including the same incompetent bunch of MI5 agents who always seem to have managed to get themselves held hostage - this was happening both the last two times I accidentally tuned into the pile of monumental shite that is Spooks. The Terrorists then start shooting hostages one by one until their demands are met (seems unclear what they actually were) until, yes, they are dramatically revealed as...JEWS!
Yes folks, its Mossad in disguise, taking hostages and committing murder for no apparent reason whilst pretending to be Al-Qaeda...led from behind the scenes by their sinister fat, balding, and therefore obviously Jewish handler. He even mouths 'Shalom' apparently, just so there's no confusion.
Is this an isolated incident on this particular freakshow? Nuh-uh. In Al-Beeb's world London it seems is positively teeming with incompetent Jewish assassins and shadowy traitors willing to do the evil Mossad's bidding, duped nonetheless by equally evil Christian fundamentalists, who as well all know have a well-developed intelligence network and terror capabilities capable (apparently) of fooling even possibly the shrewdest intelligence service in the world.
As Eric explains:
"The really bad guys in last night's episode manage to trick the Mossad into thinking that the show's hero, an MI5 agent, is some kind of anti-Semite (obviously grounds for instant assassination - Ken Livingstone watch out! -DSD) , so the Mossad sends in a crack assassination team of around six men armed with easily-identifiable Israeli pistols. ("Ooo! Jerichos - they must be Israelis!" declares one of the crack MI5 team.)
Fortunately, the tall blonde heroine this season (who in the previous episode snarls out the phrase 'Yemenite Jew') - (subtle and tasty stuff from Al-Beeb there, I wonder if any of the characters has ever snarled 'Pali Muslim' with such venom - DSD) uses her martial arts skills to disarm most of them, while unarmed hero Adam deals with the rest. The one surviving member of this "elite" unite of bumbling Jewish terrorists is called off following a phone call made by MI5 boss Harry to his Israeli counterpart, the cultural attache at the Israeli embassy. Harry threatens to have all the Mossad agents in London deported if they don't stop shooting at MI5 officers right now. And no, I'm not making this up.
I wish he was. But of course this is where fiction runs too now - no 'serious' political dramatist would ever dare reflect the real world where Islamic Terrorists actually do murder hostages, do storm embassies and arent either Jews in disguise or manipulated by them (or the Christian Fundamentalists, well known as they are for their subtlety and craft in such matters).
Nah, much easier just to script another thrilling episode of 'blame the Jews'.
Islamic Terrorists storm into an Embassy, hold the people inside it hostage, including the same incompetent bunch of MI5 agents who always seem to have managed to get themselves held hostage - this was happening both the last two times I accidentally tuned into the pile of monumental shite that is Spooks. The Terrorists then start shooting hostages one by one until their demands are met (seems unclear what they actually were) until, yes, they are dramatically revealed as...JEWS!
Yes folks, its Mossad in disguise, taking hostages and committing murder for no apparent reason whilst pretending to be Al-Qaeda...led from behind the scenes by their sinister fat, balding, and therefore obviously Jewish handler. He even mouths 'Shalom' apparently, just so there's no confusion.
Is this an isolated incident on this particular freakshow? Nuh-uh. In Al-Beeb's world London it seems is positively teeming with incompetent Jewish assassins and shadowy traitors willing to do the evil Mossad's bidding, duped nonetheless by equally evil Christian fundamentalists, who as well all know have a well-developed intelligence network and terror capabilities capable (apparently) of fooling even possibly the shrewdest intelligence service in the world.
As Eric explains:
"The really bad guys in last night's episode manage to trick the Mossad into thinking that the show's hero, an MI5 agent, is some kind of anti-Semite (obviously grounds for instant assassination - Ken Livingstone watch out! -DSD) , so the Mossad sends in a crack assassination team of around six men armed with easily-identifiable Israeli pistols. ("Ooo! Jerichos - they must be Israelis!" declares one of the crack MI5 team.)
Fortunately, the tall blonde heroine this season (who in the previous episode snarls out the phrase 'Yemenite Jew') - (subtle and tasty stuff from Al-Beeb there, I wonder if any of the characters has ever snarled 'Pali Muslim' with such venom - DSD) uses her martial arts skills to disarm most of them, while unarmed hero Adam deals with the rest. The one surviving member of this "elite" unite of bumbling Jewish terrorists is called off following a phone call made by MI5 boss Harry to his Israeli counterpart, the cultural attache at the Israeli embassy. Harry threatens to have all the Mossad agents in London deported if they don't stop shooting at MI5 officers right now. And no, I'm not making this up.
I wish he was. But of course this is where fiction runs too now - no 'serious' political dramatist would ever dare reflect the real world where Islamic Terrorists actually do murder hostages, do storm embassies and arent either Jews in disguise or manipulated by them (or the Christian Fundamentalists, well known as they are for their subtlety and craft in such matters).
Nah, much easier just to script another thrilling episode of 'blame the Jews'.
Thursday, October 26, 2006
A Tale Of Two Fundamentalists
Yep, just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water...you can trust some senior member of the Religion of Peace to open his bearded mouth and explain how yet another group of people in the world deserve what they get, even if what they are getting from his followers is extreme violence and in this case rape and sexual assault.
While not specifically referring to the rapes, brutal attacks on four women for which a group of young Lebanese men received long jail sentences, Sheik Hilali said there were women who "sway suggestively" and wore make-up and immodest dress ... "and then you get a judge without mercy (rahma) and gives you 65 years".
The 'merciless' sentence in the Bilal Skaf case that Hilali refers to (which became a byword of what passes for Islamic humour to the Muslims of Cronulla, as in the funnies of surrounding a bikini-clad bather and commenting loudly how she 'might just be worth 55 years' in that Peaceful way we know and love) took place immediately before the renewed attacks on lifeguards that sparked the Cronulla riots in suburban Sydney, where years of gang rapes, sexual assaults, harassment and violence by 'youths of a certain ethnic origin' culminated in 5000 jackboot clad neo-Nazis apparently materialising out of thin air and chasing off their tormentors whilst chanting paeans to Hitler. Or for those of us not choosing to accept the MSM's version, the local population of all races, nationalities and creeds except that certain origin came together for once and took back the beaches their Police had given up on policing.
The senior member of the RoP speaking those words in this case is one Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali, Australia's senior 'mufti' or religious leader. Just to make sure we dont mistake his inference about immodestly dressed women for something as gentle as mild sexism, he goes for broke and makes it clear that his is the kind of misogyny most of us gave up around the 7th Century. Ah, wait, I knew there was a clue there...
"If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?
"The uncovered meat is the problem."
The sheik then said: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."
He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.
"It is said in the state of zina (adultery), the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)."
Now granted to some of his congregation may feel about as obligated to listen to him as British Protestants do to Rowan 'medals from terrorists' Williams, but none of the 500-strong congregation seems to have felt the need to dissent all that loudly. And we know, because the sermon during which he made the comments was recorded, that the usual accusations of Zionost plots and the like dont really work in this case...
Its funny though. When he does realise he is being recorded, the mufti's attitude towards women seems rather different...
Revelation of the mufti's comments comes after he criticised Mr Howard last month in The Australian for saying a minority of migrant men mistreated their women. Sheik Hilali said such a minority was found in all faiths. "Those who don't respect their women are not true Muslims."
"There's a small percentage found among all religions, but we don't recognise ours as Muslims."
Oopsy. So when the cameras are rolling, wife-beaters, gang-rapists and misogyny are beyond the pale and so their perpetrators. But when he is 'amongst friends'...let's just go over that again shall we?
He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.
Which, in the interests of balance, brings us to Fundamentalist Number 2.
I wonder if Julie Bindel will be jumping all over this story the same way she does other aspects of the crime of rape...somehow I find it in me to doubt it. From her despicable utterances in the Guardian (where else?) article that the Humble Devil uncovered (and characteristically I see he is all over this story as well) I would guess not. After all the assertion that mobile phone footage of an alleged rape victim masturbating and giving head to one of her alleged attackers is merely "evidence" as opposed to, you know, Evidence, would seem to indicate that she is not a woman prepared to believe anything as flimsy as the things people actually do and say.
"If more cases such as Shabnam's occur, we may as well forget about the criminal justice system and train groups of vigilantes to exact revenge and, hopefully, deter attacks."
Riiiiight. So here's a misogynist arguing that women who step outside of the bedroom wearing anything but full body armour are 'uncovered meat', and a misandrist arguing that gangs of Amazonian harridans should patrol the streets with torches and pitchforks searching for anyone insane enough to give them a wink.
No, no fundamentalism at all on this issue then.
UPDATE: Via an email from Daydreamer of Oz, we have Al-Beeb's reaction to this story. And sure enough, rather than being a strident condemnation of excusal of and near-incitiement to gang rape, it is instead yet another tale of Islamic victimhood.
"Australia's Muslims Fear Backlash."
You really just could not make this up.
BREAKING NEWS: The swine has stepped down after collapsing under mysterious circumstances.
He was due to meet Tom Zreika, the president of the Lebanese Muslim Association, to discuss calls for his resignation, but fell ill during talks.
Interesting wording there, no? If he hadnt met Zreika yet, who was he 'talking' with when he 'fell ill'? I don't think we've heard the last of this one yet somehow...
While not specifically referring to the rapes, brutal attacks on four women for which a group of young Lebanese men received long jail sentences, Sheik Hilali said there were women who "sway suggestively" and wore make-up and immodest dress ... "and then you get a judge without mercy (rahma) and gives you 65 years".
The 'merciless' sentence in the Bilal Skaf case that Hilali refers to (which became a byword of what passes for Islamic humour to the Muslims of Cronulla, as in the funnies of surrounding a bikini-clad bather and commenting loudly how she 'might just be worth 55 years' in that Peaceful way we know and love) took place immediately before the renewed attacks on lifeguards that sparked the Cronulla riots in suburban Sydney, where years of gang rapes, sexual assaults, harassment and violence by 'youths of a certain ethnic origin' culminated in 5000 jackboot clad neo-Nazis apparently materialising out of thin air and chasing off their tormentors whilst chanting paeans to Hitler. Or for those of us not choosing to accept the MSM's version, the local population of all races, nationalities and creeds except that certain origin came together for once and took back the beaches their Police had given up on policing.
The senior member of the RoP speaking those words in this case is one Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali, Australia's senior 'mufti' or religious leader. Just to make sure we dont mistake his inference about immodestly dressed women for something as gentle as mild sexism, he goes for broke and makes it clear that his is the kind of misogyny most of us gave up around the 7th Century. Ah, wait, I knew there was a clue there...
"If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?
"The uncovered meat is the problem."
The sheik then said: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."
He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.
"It is said in the state of zina (adultery), the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)."
Now granted to some of his congregation may feel about as obligated to listen to him as British Protestants do to Rowan 'medals from terrorists' Williams, but none of the 500-strong congregation seems to have felt the need to dissent all that loudly. And we know, because the sermon during which he made the comments was recorded, that the usual accusations of Zionost plots and the like dont really work in this case...
Its funny though. When he does realise he is being recorded, the mufti's attitude towards women seems rather different...
Revelation of the mufti's comments comes after he criticised Mr Howard last month in The Australian for saying a minority of migrant men mistreated their women. Sheik Hilali said such a minority was found in all faiths. "Those who don't respect their women are not true Muslims."
"There's a small percentage found among all religions, but we don't recognise ours as Muslims."
Oopsy. So when the cameras are rolling, wife-beaters, gang-rapists and misogyny are beyond the pale and so their perpetrators. But when he is 'amongst friends'...let's just go over that again shall we?
He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.
Which, in the interests of balance, brings us to Fundamentalist Number 2.
I wonder if Julie Bindel will be jumping all over this story the same way she does other aspects of the crime of rape...somehow I find it in me to doubt it. From her despicable utterances in the Guardian (where else?) article that the Humble Devil uncovered (and characteristically I see he is all over this story as well) I would guess not. After all the assertion that mobile phone footage of an alleged rape victim masturbating and giving head to one of her alleged attackers is merely "evidence" as opposed to, you know, Evidence, would seem to indicate that she is not a woman prepared to believe anything as flimsy as the things people actually do and say.
"If more cases such as Shabnam's occur, we may as well forget about the criminal justice system and train groups of vigilantes to exact revenge and, hopefully, deter attacks."
Riiiiight. So here's a misogynist arguing that women who step outside of the bedroom wearing anything but full body armour are 'uncovered meat', and a misandrist arguing that gangs of Amazonian harridans should patrol the streets with torches and pitchforks searching for anyone insane enough to give them a wink.
No, no fundamentalism at all on this issue then.
UPDATE: Via an email from Daydreamer of Oz, we have Al-Beeb's reaction to this story. And sure enough, rather than being a strident condemnation of excusal of and near-incitiement to gang rape, it is instead yet another tale of Islamic victimhood.
"Australia's Muslims Fear Backlash."
You really just could not make this up.
BREAKING NEWS: The swine has stepped down after collapsing under mysterious circumstances.
He was due to meet Tom Zreika, the president of the Lebanese Muslim Association, to discuss calls for his resignation, but fell ill during talks.
Interesting wording there, no? If he hadnt met Zreika yet, who was he 'talking' with when he 'fell ill'? I don't think we've heard the last of this one yet somehow...



