Kick The Dogs

Via the wonderful House of Dumb, we have another piece of Tory PC lunacy to either laugh or cry at, depending on your political allegiances. This time its that luverly photogenic 'Muslim female in a suit' that the Tories love to trot out from time to time, such as afer 7/7 when she called for dialogue with the bombers' colleagues in a statement that had a marked lack of exhortations to, you know, bring them to justice.

Yes folks, the latest piece of cuddly Tory nuttiness is this: rejected asylum-seekers should be given a 'revokable' licence to work. That's right. People who have come to Europe's most liberal asylum regime and whose claims have finally filtered through the labyrinthine system of bloodsucking advocacy lawyers and Home Office encouragement and still have had their claims found to be so laughably false that they are rejected should be...allowed to stay here anyway.

I liked this bit best:

"They are unable to work or contribute to society, unable to leave and sleeping rough."

Uh-huh. So now rejected asylum-seekers are 'unable to leave'. Lady, that's the Government's job. I appreciate that its going to leave a wee carbon footprint to put the small percentage of failed asylum seekers in Britain on a plane back to their point of origin, but then again hopefully this would be our poor impoverished asylum-seeker's only flight that year anyway, fulfilling another of Blu-Labour's nutty policies.

Quite apart from the general lunacy of the Tory hierarchy in abandoning any pretence whatsoever that they are going to control mass immigration into Britain, what should we make of the loyal diehards at Conservative Home? Those 'true-blues', spinning frantically along as they try to make sense of their leadership's latest kick in the teeth to everything they believe in, usually by, as can be seen, blaming the messenger as if any such message in the 2007 Tory Party is issued without the approval of Central Office.

The Tory hierarchy figured out some time ago that it is possible to come up with any Policy, make any statement, perform any action no matter how antithetic to the beliefs of the Conservative membership, and still have that membership deliver the leaflets, send the money, put in the effort and generally roll onto its back to have its collective tummy scratched come election time.

These true-blue doggies have been kicked so many times that it seems they've actually started to like it.

(Cross-posted at A Tangled Web)

Fulfilling All The Cliches

Once upon a time the cliche of the totally out of touch Tory was a byword in British politics. It used to be that the patrician Conservative with his and hers matching four by fours and three kids named Tarquin, Rosamund and Arabella was accused (with justification or not) of not having the faintest clue how the man on the street lived.

Some things really never change. Whilst Tarquin, Rosamund and Arabella are now generally just as likely to be scions of Labour and Lib-Dem great houses as Conservative ones, there is still something really special about the sheer ignorance about daily life shown by the smug, grinning new crop of Blu-Labour Cameronites. 'Special' like bowel surgery is special.

Ladies and gentlemen, without further ado I give you Iain Dale, proving that Blu-Labour's rising stars (and deeply informed and clever pundits, let us not forget - after all our Iain has his own TV Show on politics and everything) are capable of being every bit as ignorant of real life as their Party ancestors, but with a special Cameron twist. Yes, the cliche has now extended itself to a truly global scale.

"Shout Out Liverpool alerts me to the Iraqi Roulette blog, which details every day life in downtown Baghdad. Horrifying reading. Is it really this bad?"

Oh. My. God.

How Do You Know When A Tory Eurosceptic Is Lying?

His mouth is open.

I have finally had enough of the Tories. Just enough. At least Labour and the Libarab Democrats are honest about their prejudices and their hatred for our country, its culture and institutions. They are honest about their support of bloated statism, bureaucracy and drip-drip tyranny in the shape of the EU. And in Labour's case a succession of supposed anti-terrorism and anti-hate speech laws under which guise the white Britain on the street can be scooped up and safely squared away for looking funny at anyone on the darker side of pale (unless they're Jewish, that's an exemption because, you know, those nasty old Joooz have just brought it on themselves by being so horrible to terrorists and their supporters) but under which Muslims can publicly call for mass murder on national television and have 'no case to answer'.

But the Tories? Well the Tories of Blu-Labour dont think we have gone far enough in our appeasement. For example, here is the insane case of the Muslim Armed Police Officer who was excused from guarding Jews on the grounds that, well, he doesnt like Jews very much so how could he honestly be expected to protect them from being blown up? Now the reaction of most people except the real moonbats has been to condemn this without qualification, as you would expect - especially when you consider that BNP members are not allowed in the Met as they apparently cannot be trusted to act without favouritism!

But just when you think that for a change here is a case all the parties can more or less agree is pretty cut and dried...here come the Tories to place themselves even further to the moonbat Left than the Labour Party.

Richard Barnes, a Tory member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, accused senior officers of lacking tact. He said: ‘I think it was crass management in the first place. They should have recognised there could have been a problem and not suggested this officer be posted at this embassy.’
‘The Met keep banging on about diversity, but this case shows they have learned very little at all.’

Listen to me Barnes, you motherfucker. If there is any good in this bullshit idea of 'Diversity', its the idea that while we are all different, we should all be treated the same way, by people on the street, and most especially by public institutions and those who serve in them. What 'Diversity' is NOT, and never should be except in your Cameron-coloured world, is an excuse for those public servants to pick and choose who they wish to serve, and in this case protect.

The Tory Party has purely and simply endorsed racism here. The idea that any public servant is free to make moral judgments and then decide to exclude their service from those they deem unfit, immoral or evil for that service is a truly disgusting and pernicious one.

'I got mugged last week, and my mum last year. So I'm not serving you in this Post Office cos you're black and so were the muggers.'

'So what if someone ripped off your veil and spat in your eye? I may be a copper but I dont like Muslims, I was on a tube train on 7/7.'

'No, I'm not letting you through the ticket barrier - you're obviously a Sikh judging by that turban, and Sikhs killed the Prime Minister back in India, the bastards. As a good Hindu I reserve the right not to let you on the train.'

'No way son, I know this is a youth club for everyone but well, you have to understand that as a Jew I feel you bear some responsibility for what is happening to the Palestinians. So you're not getting in.'

Are we getting the picture now Barnes, you piece of shit? I hope you have a heart attack and then the attending ambulancemen see your little blue rosette and decide to leave you gasping by the wayside on the grounds that they vote Labour and can't stand Tories, or hey maybe they could even be Muslims who just gosh darn it HATE WHITE BRITISH MEN.

Goddamn it I hate the Conservative Party v.2006 so very, very much.

How To Answer Your Own Question - The Kinky Tory Masochists Strike Again

I've said it before...and I'll say it again. 'Good Conservatives' (cue gag reflex) are kinky, perverse little masochists who like nothing better than to have a Mark Oaten moment every time their leadership opens their mouths.

Why a Mark Oaten moment? Because old Mark gets off on being crapped on only marginally more than 'Good Conservatives' do.

Take this chappie. After Call Me Dave made his latest anti-English-and-everything-remotely- Conservative-in-nature speech, our Gav got all upset, bless him.

"The thing is, I really don’t know why he did it. There’s absolutely no logical value in making a poisonous speech that make angry a proportion of 85% of the population in order to placate a proportion of 11% of the population."

Here's why Gav. In your own words, in the very next paragraph.

"I am Conservative, and despite the tone of the speech, I will remain Conservative and proud of it."

And also the priceless:

"I know that the membership won’t leave the party over this one issue; but Cameron must know what dangers he is running with his membership."

Translation: "Ooooh yes Mistress Dave, abuse me even more, that's it, call me misguided, tell me again how I have to abandon Conservatism to get a Conservative government, ooooh yeeeeeeeeeeeessssssss!!! Oh darling, you know I could never leave you no matter how bad you treat me..."

There is nothing the man can do to lose your vote Gav, and the smug wanker knows it too. That's why he can afford to publicly abandon every principle beloved of his 'core voters' like yourself and go scrabbling as far down in the dirt as Labour and the Libarab Democrats. Because your vote is totally, utterly sewn up. You can whinge, whine, protest, bluster all you like. But you'll still keep right on voting Tory, working for the Tories, delivering leaflets containing policies you disagree with featuring the utterances of a man you despise. Because you are addicted to the Conservative Party, body and soul. Accept no substitutes, for all your statements such as:

"The Conservative Party is almost alone in the United Kingdom as a reasonable right-wing party. But if that were to change then I am sure the majority of blogging right-wingers would jump at the chance to join that new party."

Yeah right. UKIP's been there for a while now and for all its failings fulfills that criteria perfectly. If all the Tories who voted for them in 2004 hadnt acted in 2005 like cattle returning to the nice warm barn despite the door being left wide open with a huge landscape full of juicy grass just in the next field, we might be looking at a very different political landscape now. That 'rightwing alternative' would be a viable and powerful political force instead of a 'fringe party'.

But you did go back into the nice warm barn Gav. And there you will stay, making statements to those who urge you to leave it like "Well yes I understand that the abattoir is always a possibility, but if we leave the barn then outside it might be even worse."

If I'd had a pound for every Gav I met during the last Election Campaign I could have probably bought the entire 150 or so UKIP members in Christchurch a meal and got the beers in too. And frankly those 'Good Conservatives' who have sat back and watched this country and most of all their Party go to rack and ruin are enough to drive anyone to drink.