In Non-Emotive Terms, Can The EU Please Go And Commit Self-Intercourse
This week news reaches the world that the EU is to create a "non-emotive lexicon for discussing radicalisation" as regards Terrorism. Oops, sorry, not Terrorism. The "committing of a violent act for political reasons."
"Certainly 'Islamic terrorism' is something we will not use ... we talk about 'terrorists who abusively invoke Islam'," an EU official told Reuters. The aim of the guidelines is to avoid the use of words that could unnecessarily offend Muslims and spark radicalisation.
So calling yourself an Islamic Terrorist means you are 'abusing Islam' - yet if anyone else uses the phrase 'Islamic Terrorism' it could, erm, turn Islamists into terrorists.
What the fuck? If these people are truly respectful of Muslims as they claim to be and if Islam is actually the Religion of Peace that they claim it to be, surely claiming that the mere use of the phrase 'Islamic Terrorism' to describe 'politically violent' acts committed by Muslims shouldnt have the power to turn these peaceful, loving chappies into foaming-at-the-mouth 'abusers of Islam' is in itself an offensive concept?
Even I actually give a lot of Muslims more credit than that.
But that isnt what this is about, of course. This is firstly Dhimmitude, coupled with the unspoken fear of all EU politicians - that they could be next, that Brussels or Strasbourg could be the Islamists next targets unless the EU Parliament continues to be good Dhimmis. Even those who would like to pretend they are the forefront of the anti-PC movement show their Dhimmitude when necessary to appease this potential threat.
But what it also is is an extension of the EU's natural totalitarianism. Political Correctness is a concept divinely appropriate for the EU as it enables them to use it to slip criticism of the EU and its institutions into the same category as wild screaming about racism and fascism to smear those who are against it. Make no mistake, this 'lexicon' will not merely be about Terrorism and security issues. This lexicon will take us right back to the time the 'independent' Advocate-General of the laughably named European Court of Justice opined that criticism of the EU should be considered akin to Blasphemy in a legal sense.
Does this sound familiar? Well, Dhimmis or not, having been a long-time member of UKIP I can tell you all about this kind of thing. The Bishop of Exeter, one of the many dioceses around Britain which receives huge amounts of 'EU money' to promote EU propaganda, once called anyone who was opposed to Regionalisation (in this case a number of noisy UKIP supporters but hey, it could equally apply to 72% of the Northwest 'Region') 'Nazis'. Campaigning for UKIP often brings snarls of 'fascist' and 'racist', simply because PC Orthodoxy is so very much in tune with the whole idea of the centralising force of the EU - a marriage, as I said, made in heaven.
So let's await the fun then. I'm sure it won't be long before the first MEP stands up in the Rubber-Stamping Room and states that he deplores the American threat to the peace-loving Mullahs of Iran, and that any possible 'abusers of Islam' who might consider the Rubber-Stamping Room a legitimate target should go and commit their politically motivated acts of violence elsewhere because we're all good Dhimmis here, oh my yes.
Watch this space.
"Certainly 'Islamic terrorism' is something we will not use ... we talk about 'terrorists who abusively invoke Islam'," an EU official told Reuters. The aim of the guidelines is to avoid the use of words that could unnecessarily offend Muslims and spark radicalisation.
So calling yourself an Islamic Terrorist means you are 'abusing Islam' - yet if anyone else uses the phrase 'Islamic Terrorism' it could, erm, turn Islamists into terrorists.
What the fuck? If these people are truly respectful of Muslims as they claim to be and if Islam is actually the Religion of Peace that they claim it to be, surely claiming that the mere use of the phrase 'Islamic Terrorism' to describe 'politically violent' acts committed by Muslims shouldnt have the power to turn these peaceful, loving chappies into foaming-at-the-mouth 'abusers of Islam' is in itself an offensive concept?
Even I actually give a lot of Muslims more credit than that.
But that isnt what this is about, of course. This is firstly Dhimmitude, coupled with the unspoken fear of all EU politicians - that they could be next, that Brussels or Strasbourg could be the Islamists next targets unless the EU Parliament continues to be good Dhimmis. Even those who would like to pretend they are the forefront of the anti-PC movement show their Dhimmitude when necessary to appease this potential threat.
But what it also is is an extension of the EU's natural totalitarianism. Political Correctness is a concept divinely appropriate for the EU as it enables them to use it to slip criticism of the EU and its institutions into the same category as wild screaming about racism and fascism to smear those who are against it. Make no mistake, this 'lexicon' will not merely be about Terrorism and security issues. This lexicon will take us right back to the time the 'independent' Advocate-General of the laughably named European Court of Justice opined that criticism of the EU should be considered akin to Blasphemy in a legal sense.
Does this sound familiar? Well, Dhimmis or not, having been a long-time member of UKIP I can tell you all about this kind of thing. The Bishop of Exeter, one of the many dioceses around Britain which receives huge amounts of 'EU money' to promote EU propaganda, once called anyone who was opposed to Regionalisation (in this case a number of noisy UKIP supporters but hey, it could equally apply to 72% of the Northwest 'Region') 'Nazis'. Campaigning for UKIP often brings snarls of 'fascist' and 'racist', simply because PC Orthodoxy is so very much in tune with the whole idea of the centralising force of the EU - a marriage, as I said, made in heaven.
So let's await the fun then. I'm sure it won't be long before the first MEP stands up in the Rubber-Stamping Room and states that he deplores the American threat to the peace-loving Mullahs of Iran, and that any possible 'abusers of Islam' who might consider the Rubber-Stamping Room a legitimate target should go and commit their politically motivated acts of violence elsewhere because we're all good Dhimmis here, oh my yes.
Watch this space.
posted by Dangerouslysubversivedad at 9:45 AM
5 Comments:
But at least the European Parliament stood up and suppported the Danish cartoonists. Contrary to expectations, many Euro MPs showed some backbone in criticising the Danish Imams and standing up for free speech.
Our own Parliament was pathetically silent.
Steve,
The Parliament didnt do anything of the sort. Every official communique issued condemned Denmark and the Danes whilst making vague noises about freedom of speech. These people have voted (not that their votes would have made any difference to what the EU did anyway) to continue aid to the Palestinians, condemn Israel and have shown their corruption and amorality at every turn.
Though that said, if individual MEPs did as you say would you mind providing some examples?
A non-emotive summary of the Religion of Peace
Twenty facts about Islam every Kaffir should know.
Islam ...
1) Is a mind-control and information-control cult founded by a murderer, torturer, brigand, rapist and pedophile called Mohammed.
2) Is Mohammed's personality cult. Has no foundations other than Mo's murderous rantings (Koran and Hadith).
3) Claims to worship the same God as Christians and Jews, but in fact worships Allah - a demonic manifestation of Mohammed's pyschopathic ego. The Death Cult incorporates pagan practices such as moon and meteorite-worship and cut-throat blood sacrifice of animals and non-believers.
4) Has no rational, philosophical nor theological basis, and the whole belief system is contradicted by science, philosophy, commonsense and human decency.
5) Cannot withstand rational criticism. Can only spread and maintain itself by ignorance, illiteracy, war, terrorism, and intimidation. Islam has bloody borders and cannot co-exist peacefully with other belief systems. Winston Churchill said that Mohammedanism in a man is as dangerous as rabies in a dog.
6) Has a superstitious dread of images of pigs, crosses, Buddhas and of course Motoons.
7) Regards Islamic women as semihuman. Wife-beating, incest and child abuse (including mufa’khathat or 'thighing' - the ritual abuse of infants) are encouraged.
8) Regards all unbelievers (Kaffirs, Kuffar, Kufrs, Kafirs) as ritually unclean subhumans to be killed, subjugated, enslaved, exploited or parasitised.
9) The ethical system applies only to Muslims. Allah encourages rape, pillage and enslavement of non-Muslims. Morality does not extend beyond the global gang (ummah). Muslim ethics are the ethics of the Mafia.
10) The cultists are motivated by hatred, greed and lust. There is no love, mercy or compassion.
11) The only religion NOT founded on The Golden Rule. Morality is based on Mohammed's example. If Mohammed did it then it's OK for all Muslims. Hence the encouragement of rape, pillage, subjugation and murder of non-believers and the institutionalised pedophilia prevalent thoughout Muslim society (justified by Mohammed's activities with Ayesha, his child sex-slave).
12) All human relations are defined by Dominance/Subjugation. Cultists have schizoid inferiority/superiority complexes. They respect strength but despise compromise as weakness. Appeasement invites more aggression. The only political system which has been strong enough to subjugate Islam is Stalinism.
13) Polygamy ensures alpha-males get extra women, leading to a shortage of women for the betas. Beta-males must either jerk off (a sin leading to hell), or form dog-packs and rape or capture kafir women as booty in a razzia, or else self-destruct then they can screw 72 mythical virgins in Allah's bordello in the sky.
14) Lying and deception of infidels (taqiyya) is OK. This may take many forms, including outright lies, feigned moderation, and condemnation of terrorist attacks to the Kaffir while rejoicing with fellow Muslims. Individuals may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, must be considered potential killers who can flip in an instant (Sudden Jihad Syndrome).
15) Muslims are forbidden to befriend Kaffirs except for purposes of deceit or where conversion may be possible.
16) The Koran is Allah's final word and cannot be changed or challenged. To do so is punishable by death. Consequently, the Death Cult can never change or be reformed. The instructions to murder and rape infidels are just as valid now as the day they were written.
17) Treaties and agreements with Kaffirs are made to be broken (Hudna).
18) The world is divided between Dar al-Islam and Dar al Harb (domain of war, the Kufr lands). Muslims living in Dar al Harb must work to disrupt their host nations until these can be brought into Dar al Islam.
19) Muslims have no obligation to their host nations and in fact are encouraged to parasitise them. Welfare fraud, identity theft, forgery etc are endemic in Western Muslim populations, and serious crime against Kaffirs is regarded as normal and justified.
20) The attack on the host nation isn't just against its religion and economy, but is aimed at its very cultural identity. Islam is a complete system, including a culture, which Muslims regard as superior (despite all evidence to the contrary) to other cultures. Muslims are therefore required to destroy the symbols of 'Jahiliya' - non-Muslim culture. In the East this has included destruction of Hindu temples and Christian churches and replacement with mosques, and destruction of Buddhist artwork and universities and replacement with rubble. The process is now beginning in the West (eg Derby Florentine Boar, piggy banks and public display of Christmas trees).
Good post DSD...AND some fascinating insight from ROP!
What a load of steaming rubbish from 'religion of pieces'!
Post a Comment
<< Home