Designated Victims
In many ways, this is kind of further to the post below about the Cult of the Designated Victim. Meet Phu the 'Anti-Racist' who, as you will see, feels that this Blog caters only to the most rabid of racist animals. As you can see, this post really upset him, bless his little heart.
I responded to his initial, ahem, comments, which seems to have taken him aback. So he posted my response, which is fair enough. Let's sample, shall we?
Phu says that he hates Red Ken, honorary head of the UAF, who feels that Jewish businessmen should 'go back to their own country'. Fair do's, us racist animals universally loathe Ken as well, but oddly 99% of us don't feel the same way about Jewish businessmen.
Phu says, in these comments, without seeming to find any irony in the dual statements at all, that whilst Palestinians are being oppressed apartheid style by Israelis, he would lock up radical Islamists for life. Apparently electing a Terrorist organisation whose Charter calls for the extermination of the nation next door counts simply as - what, high jinks? Definitely NOT as Islamic radicalism in Phu's world it seems.
I like to play with these phony 'anti-racist' types, I have to admit. Yes, its like taking candy from a baby to get them to reveal just how phony they are, but even I didnt expect that in Phu's case it would be this easy.
A T-Shirt saying Black Power on it ISNT racism because:
'One race has been oppressed, ghettoised, driven to and held at the fringes of mainstream society, the other has enjoyed superior social standing, job opportunities, justice, etc.'
But a T-Shirt saying White Power IS racist because, erm, well Phu actually seems to have forgotten to mention that, so busy was he cutting and pasting from the 'Black' entry in the Designated Victim Dictionary.
He's right though, in some ways. Certainly we can't deny that one of the two races is enjoying far superior job opportunities in certain theoretically crucial fields. And one of them does after all have its own special Commission for Racial Equality just to make sure its 'quotas' are filled in all walks of life.
And as for justice, well I bring you back to the original post that upset Phu. Or the way yelling 'We have killed the White Man' doesnt constitute any indication of racial motivein Britain. Though of course we are not exactly alone in that kind of deliberate racism on the part of our judiciary in the face of an immigrant crime wave, are we?
For the record, I dont put Phu in the category of most of his compadres on the Left (the bottom of the barrel basically). The fact that he is prepared to make 'hate' comments about radical Islam means there is obviously some small part of his mind that it isnt wholly consumed by Political Correctness, even though he doesnt seem to understand that where Islam is concerned it is moderation, not fanaticism that is the radical element.
BUT that said, his attitude towards racial matters is undoubtedly one which he himself I have no doubt would absolutely call 'racist' were he making comments such as those above to justify special codes and rules for whites rather than blacks.
This is what Political Correctness has created, ladies and gentlemen. A benighted, brainwashed generation of people who truly believe that 'equality' means different rules and standards for different races, and NOT that everybody should be treated the same way by society and by the law.
I responded to his initial, ahem, comments, which seems to have taken him aback. So he posted my response, which is fair enough. Let's sample, shall we?
Phu says that he hates Red Ken, honorary head of the UAF, who feels that Jewish businessmen should 'go back to their own country'. Fair do's, us racist animals universally loathe Ken as well, but oddly 99% of us don't feel the same way about Jewish businessmen.
Phu says, in these comments, without seeming to find any irony in the dual statements at all, that whilst Palestinians are being oppressed apartheid style by Israelis, he would lock up radical Islamists for life. Apparently electing a Terrorist organisation whose Charter calls for the extermination of the nation next door counts simply as - what, high jinks? Definitely NOT as Islamic radicalism in Phu's world it seems.
I like to play with these phony 'anti-racist' types, I have to admit. Yes, its like taking candy from a baby to get them to reveal just how phony they are, but even I didnt expect that in Phu's case it would be this easy.
A T-Shirt saying Black Power on it ISNT racism because:
'One race has been oppressed, ghettoised, driven to and held at the fringes of mainstream society, the other has enjoyed superior social standing, job opportunities, justice, etc.'
But a T-Shirt saying White Power IS racist because, erm, well Phu actually seems to have forgotten to mention that, so busy was he cutting and pasting from the 'Black' entry in the Designated Victim Dictionary.
He's right though, in some ways. Certainly we can't deny that one of the two races is enjoying far superior job opportunities in certain theoretically crucial fields. And one of them does after all have its own special Commission for Racial Equality just to make sure its 'quotas' are filled in all walks of life.
And as for justice, well I bring you back to the original post that upset Phu. Or the way yelling 'We have killed the White Man' doesnt constitute any indication of racial motivein Britain. Though of course we are not exactly alone in that kind of deliberate racism on the part of our judiciary in the face of an immigrant crime wave, are we?
For the record, I dont put Phu in the category of most of his compadres on the Left (the bottom of the barrel basically). The fact that he is prepared to make 'hate' comments about radical Islam means there is obviously some small part of his mind that it isnt wholly consumed by Political Correctness, even though he doesnt seem to understand that where Islam is concerned it is moderation, not fanaticism that is the radical element.
BUT that said, his attitude towards racial matters is undoubtedly one which he himself I have no doubt would absolutely call 'racist' were he making comments such as those above to justify special codes and rules for whites rather than blacks.
This is what Political Correctness has created, ladies and gentlemen. A benighted, brainwashed generation of people who truly believe that 'equality' means different rules and standards for different races, and NOT that everybody should be treated the same way by society and by the law.
posted by Dangerouslysubversivedad at 6:03 PM
7 Comments:
I love how he explains that black employees are justified in parading round the workplace in racist regalia (because they're oppressed, every one of them), while bemoaning the difficulty some blacks have in getting jobs. Could these two things be related ?
How is that you see contradiction in acknowledging the oppression of Palestinians whilst also the evil of Islamo-facsism?
It's almost as if you have thought, it's all or nothing, either this side is bad or that side is bad, and then closed your eyes and picked one out of a hat.
Is it so hard for you to understand that not everything is black and white?
Are you actually denying that ordinary Palestinian people have suffered?
Or are all Palestinians the same to you, fanatical murderous scum?
the whole tee shirt debate is tiresome, but for the record I have just responded to your comments in that post and don't feel like typing it all again.
time and again I seem to need to tell you that I agree with what constitutes a racist murder and the cases you highlight have been labelled as nothing different by me. So why continue to imply that I deny the racist nature of the killings?
I don't!
Again, it's not all or nothing, you oversimplify.
Yes, I DO know that getting to wear a black power tee shirt could be viewed as offensive, yet is not much of a privilege when compared with the superior social standing enjoyed by whites.
But that does NOT mean I think the blatant racist murder of a white person should be treated as anything but.
There you go, I touched on the tee shirt thing a little bit.
Again, if you genuinely desire equality, then I'm sure you will appreciate there are bigger issues to be dealt with before we can get down to banning black power tee shirts. We can focus on eradicating the circumstances that have provoked the wearing of the offending rag in the first place.
'Again, if you genuinely desire equality, then I'm sure you will appreciate there are bigger issues to be dealt with before we can get down to banning black power tee shirts. We can focus on eradicating the circumstances that have provoked the wearing of the offending rag in the first place'.
OR, and I realise you will think this is a daft idea, we could just treat everybody exactly the same regardless of race.
Absolutely, DSD. Everyone treated the same, without race being brought into it. I do it in my everyday life, I'm sure you do it too, in fact, to all but a minority, the colour of a person's skin is of no more significance than the colour of their eyes. Sod this stupid "oppression" culture, it FEEDS racism rather than solves it. One of my clients is a black man, and we have a great laugh sending each other up with mock-insults, I say to him "it is coz you is black" and he says all us honkeys look the same to him, and we pee ourselves laughing at the stupidity of it all.
My black client didn't sit around moaning to himself that he was oppressed; he got off his arse and built up a successful business for himself. Sure, he may have encountered some racism along the way, but he obviously didn't let it daunt him. Any black person with brains, ambition and a sense of humour can rise above his/her "oppressed status" and be successful in Britain in 2006. It's only those who insist on remaining marginalised and relying on handouts and pity, that keep racism alive.
"One of my clients is a black man, and we have a great laugh sending each other up with mock-insults, I say to him "it is coz you is black" and he says all us honkeys look the same to him, and we pee ourselves laughing at the stupidity of it all."
Wish I had that much fun at work.
"It's only those who insist on remaining marginalised and relying on handouts and pity, that keep racism alive. "
Okay, so what about when a non-white kills a white man, in a racially motivated attack, is that not racism? The dead man won't choose to remain marginalised, after all.
Thanks for the link to the site.
It's sometimes fun visting sites of the 'left' to throw in a comment or two.
Lenin's Tomb is always worth a laugh.
Phu,
With all due respect, what on earth does that last sentence mean?
Post a Comment
<< Home