Random Thoughts on Path to 9/11 Part 1
Firstly, in purely cinematic terms...wow. Fantastically gritty docudrama style photography, edgy close up shots of the key players such as Harvey Keitel, last seen by this Zionist Conspirator in the excellent National Treasure delivering wonderful lines such as 'This is not a day for Um'. The characterisations were all quite believable as well, the portrait of the hideous Madeline Albright was so accurate physically and vocally that it made this Blogger want to gouge his eyes out at the sheer horror of the Wrinkled Queen Of Appeasement.
The history behind the drama went right the way back to the first World Trade Centre bombing back in 1993, and from the word go gave us convincing characterisations of the FBI and CIA teams involved with the ongoing investigations, if not always of those they were tracking. I wasnt overly impressed with the idea of Ramzi and Khalid sitting in a decadent western nightclub drinking and dirty dancing with black women in unlikely makeup - artistic licence taken a bit too far there methinks. The portrait of Zawahiri was eerily believable however.
Interestingly, the soon to be Mrs Zionist Conspirator sat through it quite happily, asking questions aplenty, particularly about Afghanistan. Now regular visitors to this Blog know exactly how I feel about Afghanistan and the way we have treated the Northern Alliance who actually did 90% of the dying and groundfighting in Afghanistan - much the same way I feel about Iraq, and the equally despicable way we treated the Kurds who shed a large amount of their own blood and have been pushed aside. The portrait of the Northern Alliance warlord Masoud was quite excellent, I must find the name of the chap who played him.
'Are there any men left in Washington?' asks Masoud when the order not to go after Bin Laden because of worries over 'civilian casualties' (hey how does 2996 civilian casualties grab you) is given. 'Or only cowards?'
Cowards, old bean. This was the Clinton Administration.
'I bet he did sleep with her though, right?' asked the Zionist Conspirator Fiance when Clinton's infamous 'I never had sexual relations with that woman' denial was briefly screened. Well, she was only a teenager at the time so why should she know about US presidential history? A two-minute potted 'events that prove Bill Clinton was a philandering lying scumbag traitor to the American people' lesson ensued, though as I pointed out if you want a fairly clear pre-Whitehouse biopic that does everything but call its central characters Bill and Hillary, you could just go watch the excellent 'Primary Colors'.
As we watched events such as the folied Millenium bomb plot unfold, we mused on the basic problem with the combatting of terrorism. Namely that people really dont take notice when a bomb plot is foiled. It hasnt hurt anyone (well unless your an Islamic child pornographer from Forest Gate anyway), and life just goes on as it did before. Ironically, the better the security services do their jobs, the less help and support they get from a fickle, media-brainwashed public that would rather believe the Guardian when it says that its all made up and the latest terror raids are meant to take pressure off Tony Blair in some fashion.
She did laugh when I told her that the latest bunch of bearded Islamofascists to be caught with their pants and bombmaking equipment down have had their martyrdom videos unearthed in Wycombe Forest - how embarassing for them in Court...the phrase 'bang to rights' rather covers it methinks.
I await Part 2 tonight though I will have to wait until Tuesday to watch it as Conception has its first full pre-Committee meeting tonight in Ferndown - I will ask for a minute's silence, I hope someone else will do the same.
Because no matter how many plots we foil, we should never forget the ones we didnt.
The history behind the drama went right the way back to the first World Trade Centre bombing back in 1993, and from the word go gave us convincing characterisations of the FBI and CIA teams involved with the ongoing investigations, if not always of those they were tracking. I wasnt overly impressed with the idea of Ramzi and Khalid sitting in a decadent western nightclub drinking and dirty dancing with black women in unlikely makeup - artistic licence taken a bit too far there methinks. The portrait of Zawahiri was eerily believable however.
Interestingly, the soon to be Mrs Zionist Conspirator sat through it quite happily, asking questions aplenty, particularly about Afghanistan. Now regular visitors to this Blog know exactly how I feel about Afghanistan and the way we have treated the Northern Alliance who actually did 90% of the dying and groundfighting in Afghanistan - much the same way I feel about Iraq, and the equally despicable way we treated the Kurds who shed a large amount of their own blood and have been pushed aside. The portrait of the Northern Alliance warlord Masoud was quite excellent, I must find the name of the chap who played him.
'Are there any men left in Washington?' asks Masoud when the order not to go after Bin Laden because of worries over 'civilian casualties' (hey how does 2996 civilian casualties grab you) is given. 'Or only cowards?'
Cowards, old bean. This was the Clinton Administration.
'I bet he did sleep with her though, right?' asked the Zionist Conspirator Fiance when Clinton's infamous 'I never had sexual relations with that woman' denial was briefly screened. Well, she was only a teenager at the time so why should she know about US presidential history? A two-minute potted 'events that prove Bill Clinton was a philandering lying scumbag traitor to the American people' lesson ensued, though as I pointed out if you want a fairly clear pre-Whitehouse biopic that does everything but call its central characters Bill and Hillary, you could just go watch the excellent 'Primary Colors'.
As we watched events such as the folied Millenium bomb plot unfold, we mused on the basic problem with the combatting of terrorism. Namely that people really dont take notice when a bomb plot is foiled. It hasnt hurt anyone (well unless your an Islamic child pornographer from Forest Gate anyway), and life just goes on as it did before. Ironically, the better the security services do their jobs, the less help and support they get from a fickle, media-brainwashed public that would rather believe the Guardian when it says that its all made up and the latest terror raids are meant to take pressure off Tony Blair in some fashion.
She did laugh when I told her that the latest bunch of bearded Islamofascists to be caught with their pants and bombmaking equipment down have had their martyrdom videos unearthed in Wycombe Forest - how embarassing for them in Court...the phrase 'bang to rights' rather covers it methinks.
I await Part 2 tonight though I will have to wait until Tuesday to watch it as Conception has its first full pre-Committee meeting tonight in Ferndown - I will ask for a minute's silence, I hope someone else will do the same.
Because no matter how many plots we foil, we should never forget the ones we didnt.
Labels: Afghanistan, Conception, Iraq, The Missus
posted by Dangerouslysubversivedad at 8:07 AM
25 Comments:
Quite right, even one such is a dozen too many. Knowing your enemy is only the beginning, it seems that remembering his enmity is the real test.
The Islamic child sex offender you mention, is he Arie Scher or Joseph Ofri Sagiv?
Those damned A-rabs! They're always posing as Israelis to commit their crimes, trying to smear the good name of the Chosen People.
Let's nuke 'em!
Is that the best you can do 'Sol', use Google to find a couple of convicted Jewish kiddy fiddlers to balance against a faith whose revered prophet took a wife at nine years old? That's beyond feeble.
But child betrothal(sp) was common in antiquity, wasn't it? The kings and Queens of all urope were promised off and married to rival Princes/Princesses as soon as the could walk, practically. This cannot be compared to people in modern day Brazil, in positions of power, using native children in porn/murder videos for profit.
Who's being feeble here?
And by the way, neither has been convicted. They've just been accused, whereupon Scher ran away back to Israel. We'll see if they convict Sagiv. Probably let him skip bail back to Israel. Thank God for Israel, eh?
Antiquity, Sol. What I'm suggesting is that some of us have managed to advance a little bit since then. Unfortunately Islam hasnt.
So two Jews are accused of paedophilia and one runs back to Israel. And this is connected to kiddy porn being found on the guy from Forest Gate's computer how exactly? Where were you when scumbag Leftists were protesting and threatening mayhem because the BNP wanted to stage an anti-paedophile rally in Keighley?
Two Jews are (possibly) paedophiles so naturally that means Israel and the Jews are bad, have I got that right? This thread didnt even mention Israel, yet here you are again with your Nazi wank fantasies about evil Jews. Go join the BPP or the NF or Respect and work off all that pent-up frustration at the lack of concentration camps in 2006 with them will you?
No, it just means that their paedophilia is unrelated to their being Muslim. Peoples' of all faiths molest children. Stop trying to incite hatred by conflating Islam with evil. It's stupid and racist and people can see through it.
Not nice, is it, when they smear you back?
'Sol Kashberg' accuses me of racism. Good one.
Islam's tenets are a matter of record, as are the Revered Prophet Mohammed's procilivities. The late but unlamented Zarqawi got his dear teeny wife pregnant at 14, charming chap, for example.
Conflating Islam with evil is a matter of observation, not racism. Or do you honestly think that the behaviour of every Islamic society around the world can be judged as anything but evil?
Gay, might you be? Jewish? Female, perhaps, and been tempted to, say, not wear a full body covering in public? Or had a fling? Maybe you want to convert to another religion from Islamism.
In each of the above cases, if you live in an Islamic country, you're DEAD. So dont tell me Islam isnt evil - these arent just 'cultural differences', these are barbaric savage practices which are still part of the medieval world you allude to.
Sol said;
"Peoples' of all faiths molest children. Stop trying to incite hatred by conflating Islam with evil. It's stupid and racist".
I agree with the first part of that paragraph, unfortunately feeble, inhuman bastards do indeed exist in every society.
But Inciting racial hatred? - No, not at all, however events like 7/7 are quite likely to.
Nor is expressing an opinion that is uncomfortable for you to hear either 'racist' or stupid, it's simply an opinion formed through personal obsevation, and supported by fact.
Not all Muslims are 'evil', they are however, incompatible with western society and values.
Sol's problem lies in his failure to understand the difference between "A and B are coincidental" and "A has a strong link with B".
For example Pakistan has just reaffirmed its intention to retain Sharia law with regard to rape. Currently a raped woman must produce four male witnesses to stand any chance of convicting the rapist. Should she fail to provide the four witnesses, she can be charged with adultery. On the one hand we have women and human rights groups campaigning to change the law, to bring the offence under secular law. On the other we have mainstream Islamists seeking to retain the existing law despite the overwhelming evidence of injustice.
It must be clear, even to Sol, that Islam is intrinsically linked to the retrogressive side in the case above. The article quotes Muslim campaigners as saying that a change in the law would be "un-Islamic". The campaigners for change are Muslim yet their whole case rests upon a rejection of part of Islam.
Also there is no doubt that Koranic law provides plenty of precedence for the acceptability of child brides. It is true that during the twentieth century many Islamic states passed laws to reduce or eliminate this practice, but it still went on. If those states had continued the movement towards western secularism, I have little doubt that the practice would have declined and eventually disappeared. However, we now see a worldwide growth of fundamentalist Islam. Those parts of the world that have adopted Sharia or are sympathetic to it have restored retrogressive penal codes. Sharia advocates have shown support for repealing any laws that break with Koranic tradition including those against child brides. Opponents are accused of being anti-Islamic.
In as much as child brides are a form of paedophilia, and that paedophilia is evil, it is not unreasonable for DSD to argue that Islam (the ideology) is therefore (at least in part) evil. Individual Muslims are good to the extent that they reject those parts of the ideology that are evil.
It seems to me that Sol's argument would be stronger if he could provide evidence of mainstream Judaic support for or involvement in paedophilia. Should he succeed in this he would still only prove that Judaism is equal to Islam in being an evil ideology. Good luck!
Sol said;
"Peoples' of all faiths molest children. Stop trying to incite hatred by conflating Islam with evil. It's stupid and racist".
What race is Islam?
I agree that people of all faiths molest children, but only Islam institutionalises and 'divinely' approves of pedophilia, rape and infant molestation. See #7, 11 and 13 below.
Islam ...
1) Is a mind-control and information-control cult founded by a murderer, torturer, brigand, rapist and pedophile called Mohammed. The mind-control and information-control aspects require that all criticism be silenced.
2) Is Mohammed's personality cult. Has no foundations other than Mo's murderous rantings (Koran and Hadith). The Koran consists of two conflicting parts - Meccan and Medinan (peaceful and violent resepectively). The Medinan stuff supersedes ('abrogates') the Meccan stuff. Muslims act Medinan, but quote Meccan verses to the gullible infidels.
3) Claims to worship the same God as Christians and Jews, but in fact worships Allah - a demonic manifestation of Mohammed's pyschopathic ego. The Death Cult mixes garbled versions of Christian and Jewish scriptures with pagan practices such as moon and meteorite-worship, and cut-throat blood sacrifice of animals and non-believers.
4) Has no rational, philosophical nor theological basis, and the whole belief-system is contradicted by science, philosophy, commonsense, human decency and internal inconsistency.
5) Cannot withstand rational criticism. Can only spread and maintain itself by ignorance, illiteracy, war, terrorism, and intimidation. Islam has bloody borders and cannot co-exist peacefully with other belief systems. Winston Churchill said that Islam in a man is as dangerous as hydrophobia (rabies) in a dog.
6) Has a superstitious dread of images of pigs, crosses, Buddhas, Saint George (and his flag) and of course Motoons.
7) Regards Islamic women as semihuman. Wife-beating, incest and child abuse (including mufa’khathat or 'thighing' - the ritual abuse of infants) are encouraged.
8) Regards all unbelievers (Kaffirs, Kuffar, Kufrs, Kafirs) as ritually unclean subhumans to be killed, subjugated, enslaved, exploited or parasitised. Kafirs are described by the Arabic word 'najis' - literally 'filth'. That's why Muslim hatred of Kafirs is intrinsic to their 'religion'. A Kafir doesn't need to DO anything to offend a Muslim, his very existence is enough of an affront.
9) The ethical system applies only to Muslims. Allah encourages rape, pillage, extortion and enslavement of non-Muslims. Morality does not extend beyond the global gang (ummah). Muslim ethics are the ethics of the Mafia.
10) Allah's followers are motivated by hatred, greed and lust. There is no love, mercy or compassion. Allah is vindictive, unpredictable, capricious and devious - "Allah leads astray whom he pleases".
11) The only religion NOT founded on The Golden Rule. Morality is based on Mohammed's example. If Mohammed did it then it's OK for all Muslims. Hence the encouragement of rape, pillage, subjugation and murder of non-believers and the institutionalised pedophilia prevalent thoughout Muslim society (justified by Mohammed's activities with Ayesha, his child sex-slave).
12) All human relations are defined by Dominance/Subjugation. Muslims have schizoid inferiority/superiority complexes. (A well-balanced Muslim is one with a chip on each shoulder). They respect strength but despise compromise as weakness. Appeasement invites more aggression. The only political system which has been strong enough to subjugate Islam is Stalinism.
13) Polygamy ensures alpha-males get extra women, leading to a shortage of women for the betas. Beta-males must either jerk off (a sin leading to hell), or form dog-packs and rape or capture kafir women as booty in a razzia, or else self-destruct in the presence of infidels then they can screw 72 mythical virgins in Allah's bordello in the sky. Beta-males are often encouraged by their relatives to become suicide bombers because of the belief that such murderous 'martyrs' will be able to intercede with Allah to take 70 of their relatives to paradise with them.
14) Lying and deception of infidels (taqiyya) is encouraged. This may take many forms, including outright lies, feigned moderation, and condemnation of terrorist attacks to the Kaffir while rejoicing with fellow Muslims. All Muslims are victims of some group of Kafirs and harbor grudges against them and against Kafirs in general. Individuals may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and must be considered potential killers who can flip in an instant (SJS -'Sudden Jihad Syndrome').
15) Muslims are forbidden to befriend Kaffirs except for purposes of deceit or where conversion may be possible.
16) The Koran is Allah's final word and cannot be changed or challenged. To do so is punishable by death. Consequently, the Death Cult can never change or be reformed. The instructions to murder and rape infidels are just as valid now as the day they were written. Since Islam cannot be modernised, the Muslims are attempting to Islamise modernity. This requires spreading Islam in the West and simultaneously preventing any criticism of the cult by intimidation and PC legislation to curtail freedom of expression.
17) Treaties and agreements with Kaffirs are made to be broken (Hudna). The word of a Muslim to a Kafir counts for nothing in the eyes of Allah.
18) The world is divided between Dar-al-Islam and Dar-al-Harb (the domain of war, the Kufr lands). Muslims living in Dar-al-Harb must work to disrupt their host nations until these can be brought into Dar-al-Islam.
19) Muslims have no obligation to their host nations and in fact are encouraged to parasitise them. Welfare fraud, identity theft, forgery etc are endemic in Western Muslim populations, and serious crime against Kaffirs is regarded as normal and justified. Extortion rackets against Kafirs are mandated by the Koran ('jizya' is the Arabic term for 'protection money' payable by Jews and Christians to Muslims).
20) The attack on the host nation isn't just against its religion and economy, but is aimed at its very cultural identity. Islam is a complete system, including a culture, which Muslims regard as superior (despite all evidence to the contrary) to other cultures. Muslims are therefore required to destroy the symbols of 'Jahiliya' (sometimes sp. Jahiliyya) - non-Muslim culture. In the East this has included destruction of Hindu temples and Christian churches and replacement with mosques, and destruction of Buddhist artwork and universities and replacement with heaps of rubble. This process of cultural replacement is now beginning in the West..
Bloody hell ROP, you dont half go on a bit. I have to say I disagree with parts of what you wrote, but others are right on the money.
When you post these lengthy lists of yours, a link to illustrate some of the points would be very helpful, for example I have never heard of this 'thighing' thing you refer to at point 7 - without some further explanation or link to such it comes across as far-fetched when it is put so bluntly without extra evidence.
"Another technique used by Muslim men is called "thighing". The child's legs are pressed together and the abuser inserts his penis between the thighs of the little boy or girl. As this was how Mohammed had sex with his wife, Aisha, from the time she was six years old the practice, of course, was approved of by Ayatollah Khomeini who in his Little Green Book asserted “It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.” Yes, indeed, you can be a good Muslim while copulating with the thighs of an infant. An Arab woman vigorously denounces this vile practice in the following video clip from Bahrain TV. Her denunciation of the "thighing" of infants and young girls comes towards the end of the interview."
From http://kenlydell.typepad.com/islamic_evil/muslim_sexual_perversion/index.html
The video clip referred to in the previous quote is
http://terror-watch.net/media/womans_rights_islam.wmv
You people make me laugh. You're chasing about, accusing Muslims of precisely the things Jews have always been accused of. Wonder how this comes about...ah, perhaps the press has pointed you all in the right direction and there you are, doing the Jews work for them. They're laughing like hell in Tel Aviv.
The press? Because the Zionist control the media and all that international anti-Israel reporting during the last two months is all some cunning Zionist plot, right?
What a tool you are 'Sol'.
Oh, yes, the international anti-Israel reporting has been SO harsh, hasn't it?
Ever hear of AOL-Time Warner, you prick? Ever hear of the Walt Disney Company, you turd? Ever hear of Viacom, you moron? These are just the three largest media conglomerates on the planet.
Those damned A-rabs must own all of them, under the disguise of being Jews. Tricky devils these A-rabs.
You really are a hick, redneck, eh?
Only the most wacked out of Nazi fuckwits could possibly think that the media has been 'kind' to Israel in recent months. Qana, Hajjgate, the ambulance hoax...the list goes on but there's obviously no more point arguing with you, 'Sol'. I've had my fun, so you can go back to wanking over your copy of the Protocols now.
Is that any way to talk to a Jew? Is that any way to address the son of Holocaust survivors? Just because I'm a Zionist you accuse me of Nazism?
Let's see what the ADL have to say about this, young man!
You just remember to take those nice blue pills the doctor gave you sweetie.
Unless I have a written apology by this time next week, you'll have the thought police at your door. You goy zionists are often the worst antisemites in the end. Don't bother moderating this comment, I have already sent this thread to the appropriate department of the ADL and wheels are in motion. So the damage is done. You only have yourself to blame.
On second thoughts no, dont go back to wanking over your copy of the Protocols Sol, you're just too much fun to play with.
Keep going you Nazi muppet, you remind me very much of another Jew-hater I know - he's hilarious fun to wind up too!
'Nazi muppet'? 'Jew hater'?...you're just digging yourself deeper and deeper, my uncircumcised friend. It'll be fun seeing you in court.
Check my ISP. You'll see I'm based in Tel Aviv.
Sol, because you always post anonymously of course I cant see your ISP you fucking idiot. I dont care whether your based in Tel Aviv, Haifa, Jerusalem or downtown Sderot next to a building full of rocket holes. If your not a Jew your a Nazi muppet, and if you are a Jew your a self-hating Nazi muppet.
Keep going though before this thread drops off the page, this is really all very humourous.
Technology isn't your thing, is it?
Post a Comment
<< Home