Dangerously Subversive Dad - Anti-Politician Politics & Cute Anecdotes About The Kids

Ladies and Gentlemen...

2009-09-29T12:39:00.002+01:00

...spotted whilst allowing the tiny one to giggle at multiple primate pictures, I give you the Michael Jackson Monkey.

Jew-Hatin Loony Of The Year

2009-09-26T09:57:00.003+01:00

Meet the man that dear not-at-all-incompetent President Obama thinks should be President of a medium-sized country.

TEGUCIGALPA -- It's been 89 days since Manuel Zelaya was booted from power. He's sleeping on chairs, and he claims his throat is sore from toxic gases and "Israeli mercenaries'' are torturing him with high-frequency radiation.

"We are being threatened with death,'' he said in an interview with The Miami Herald, adding that mercenaries were likely to storm the embassy where he has been holed up since Monday and assassinate him.

I blogged about this would-be-dictator and his Leftie fellow travellers on ATW before, assuming then he was just another, well, would-be dictator that ticked enough of the 'right' boxes for, as explained in the ATW post, 90% of the Left including President Obama to back him against his country's Congress, Supreme Court and military.

Didn't realise back then he was also a deranged Joooooo conspiracy theorist as well and therefore really ticks those boxes off. The fact that Obama is still backing this nutball and at his insistence the IMF is redirecting funds from the legitimate government and into the pockets of Zelaya's cronies says it all.

Hot Air has a little more on this, and reminds us that the Pig Song principle would be applied here by any sane administration.

The Last Refuges Of A Real Scoundrel

2009-09-22T13:58:00.006+01:00

When Europhiles don patriotic clothes, it's really evidence of desperation. And none, it seems, are more desperate than the snappily-named Irish Europhiles of 'Generation Yes', personified here by one Sharon Waters.

Ms Waters is outraged - outraged I tell you! - at foreign intervention in the Irish referendum campaign. Her patriotic spirit is deeply offended.

"Generation YES are outraged at this intervention by foreign interests into this crucial debate on Ireland’s vital national interests."

What she is talking about, of course, is Nigel Farage's presence in Ireland, a small counterbalance to the steady stream of European politicians who are parading through the country issuing a mixture of threats and plautitudes. Dignitaries such as Lech Walesa, who seems to have totally forgotten the concepts which propelled him to prominence in the first place, and now even the newly reconfirmed Jose-Manuel Barroso as well (reconfirmed with the cooperation of the 'Eurosceptic' Tories, might I might I add).

But that's not 'outrageous foreign intervention' to Ms Waters. 'EU Money' (for which read British Taxpayers' Money) is pouring into the Yes campaign like a raging flood, but that is perfectly above board and acceptable.

What isn't acceptable is UKIP. Existing. At all. So Ms Waters launches into a breathless tirade of smears and outrageous lies to try and paint UKIP as barely short of the heirs to the Nazis. The most egregious passage is reproduced here:

"They seek to dismantle the Belfast Agreement (*1), reintroduce the death penalty (*2) and abolish social security (*3), they prevent disabled people from standing for election on their ticket (*4), and they also deny climate change (*5) and the Holocaust (*6)."

Where to start? Well with number one, I suppose. Now Nigel Farage's fierce antipathy to the Belfast Agreement is well known, in fact when I interviewed him for A Tangled Web a couple of years ago he referred to the Peace Process in general as 'loathsome'. But he is one person, and indeed is stepping down as Party Leader of UKIP.

The document referred to by Ms Waters can be downloaded here (my father was actually part of the Constitutional Policy Group which drafted it, by coincidence). It doesn't mention the Belfast Agreement at all. Not once. So Item One can be quite simply referred to as a Lie, Big Fat.

So to number two. The Death Penalty. Firstly, I personally would be proud to be part of a Party actively stating that it will reintroduce the Death Penalty if elected. However, UKIP isn't doing so. It has merely pledged a national Referendum on the subject in response to . So even leaving aside the pros and cons of the issue itself, this is a best a misrepresentation of UKIP's position and at worst a Lie, Small.

So, to Number Three. Abolish Social Security? Well I dont have a copy of the 2004 Election Manifesto referred to, but here's what the General Election manifesto a year later has to say on Welfare reform:

"The objective will be to free as many people as possible from benefits by making the rules more transparent and cutting down on means-testing."

UKIP has never, ever called for the complete abolition of Social Security. Frankly I find statements like the above rather on the wishy-washy side, and they are certainly a million miles away from abolition!

Verdict on Number Three? Lie, Big Fat and faintly Ridiculous as well.

So, to number four. The issue of 'no disabled candidates', referring to the whipped up storm about Jack Biggs, a disabled man who was offered a paper candidacy due to his local UKIP Branch's inability to support a candidate unable to deliver leaflets but then turned out to have a rather different motive for his 'anger' when the emails between himself and the local UKIP Group were published...

"John,

I have been special Forces. I am a very good friend but a very bad enemy.

If you stay on track, ignoring me, but trying to unseat my Ukip minded daughter I will take the story for the Echo, ref you do not want disabled candidates for Ukip.

This is not a threat but a promise.

This anti disability bit by Ukip will also probably go National in the press."

Uh-huh. So the poor wittle disabled chap was never actually denied his chance to be a candidate, and was actually just trying to blackmail his local UKIP Branch into giving his Tory offspring a free run...but of course I'm sure Ms Waters was completely unaware of the real story. Or that UKIP has, for example, fielded blind candidates in the past. The female half of the couple who used to pretty much singlehandedly run the New Forest West branch next door was in a wheelchair in fact, and stood as a candidate herself a while ago.

But let's not let the facts of a single incident that was actually an attempt at blackmail anyway get in the way of pretending that there is some kind of 'No Raspberry-Ripples' Policy in force within an enemy organisation. Verdict on Number Four: Lie, Big Fat.

Now, let's have fun with Number Five. Denying Climate Change - the heresy! The horror!

Well, once again whilst there is a very significant body within UKIP, including many of its representatives such as David Campbell-Bannerman (who had the dubious pleasure of being present when terror-supporter Caroline Lucas of the Greens uttered her most infamous statement yet), who believe that 'Global Warming is a myth' as he put it during the above-linked debate, once again Waters is confusing the opinions of members of a Party with Party Policy. UKIP as a political body does not 'deny climate change', voting at Conference to stay 'neutral' on the subject. Though I dearly wish they did, they don't.

Verdict on Number Five: A misrepresentation rather than an outright lie, but a forgviable one.

And so we turn to the greatest evidence of Waters' utter derangement, the smear of smears. The accusation that UKIP denies the Holocaust.

I was a UKIP member for a few years, a Constituency Chairman for two of those, and I'm still involved on the fringes. It has its fair share of kooks and nutters, to be sure, just like every Party. For example, one person I knew turned out to be a Truther and probably still isn't speaking to me after I verbally tore her a new one at a Cheese and Wine thingummy. But one thing I've never encountered there is any suggestion of anti-semitism. On the contrary, the local branches here seem to contain more than their fair share of Jewish members, in fact - including a good friend of mine who fought in the Sinai in 1967.

So can there be any basis at all for such an outrageous statement? Who is the 'Alistair McConnachie' mentioned by Waters? Well, the waste of space in question was an officer in UKIP Scotland in 2000 before showing himself to be a disciple of the revolting Fred Leuchter, a man who was the subject of a banning order from the UK a very long time before Geert Wilders, Michael Savage or any bearded Islamic crazy. Needless to say McConnachie wasn't an officer in UKIP Scotland for very long afterwards, and now rather amusingly runs his own minor Party - and you guessed it, he's now a Greenie in charge of 'Independent Green Voice' (no Party website, sadly).

So nine years ago a single nutball reveals his moonbattery and gets booted out of UKIP - and from that Waters extrapolates that UKIP - the Party - denies the Holocaust. Such a smear is so utterly vile that words cannot suffice to describe how much I'd like to punch this woman in the face, then tar and feather her before marching her through the streets of Dublin wearing a placard saying 'The Holocaust Is Not A Subject To Use For Cheap Political Gain'. Granted people are unlikely to see the small writing required, but it'd be worth it anyway.

Verdict on Number Six: I hope the bitch catches a highly amusing skin disease. Minimum.

One of the English language's most ill-used quotes is the one about patriotism being the last refuge of the scoundrel. In this case, faux patriotism and outrageous lies appear to be the only weapons the scoundrels of the Europhile movement have left.

This Woman Is Deranged In The Best Possible Way

2009-09-18T14:48:00.002+01:00

"Me: (Starts moving my wrist so it appears the bear is humping his face.) "Rwwwrr. Mmmmm. Ahhh. Mmmmm."

J: "What the hell are you doing now?"

Me: "He's humping your head. Rwwwrr. Mmmm. Who's your daddy? Ahhhh. Ohh baby. Rrrwwwrr."

J: "And that's not normal bear behavior."

Me: "His name is Chester the Molester."

J: "Oh. Well, that explains it. And you can stop humping my head with that puppet anytime now."

Me: "He's not done yet. Rwwwrrr. RWWWWRRR! OHH! AHHHHHHH!! There. Now he wants to cuddle."

J: "Somehow I think I'll be reading this on your blog soon."

Sublime craziness.

A Very Neat Idea Indeed

2009-09-18T12:15:00.002+01:00

Ranting Stan (not that he rants much nowadays, he certainly seems to have mellowed since I started reading him a few years ago) has a post up where he expounds a rather clever method of dealing with the problems of the Immigration running sore that is the French Coast. Go read. I rather like the idea, and as he says, it did work in Malaya after all...

Mummy's Wide Skirts

2009-09-18T09:35:00.004+01:00

Once again, we have another one of those 'Riddle me this' questions. Let's say this time that (as I commented here) newly made BNP MEP Andrew Brons’ Brussels researcher was ‘exposed’ as having a history of going on NF marches calling Israel all sorts of names, such as an ‘apartheid state’. He might even have been kicked out of the Students Union for mimicking violence against ‘Zionists’. Anxious to preserve their thin veneer of respectability (don’t laugh) Brons fires him as the Internet clamour grows.

Would Harry's Place, so vigilant as they normally are in exposing and condemning racism in all forms including this one, agree to give that researcher a guest post spot to defend himself? Not a freakin chance! Yet now that 'Seph' Brown has been dismissed from his job with a Labour MP, he is being given a chance to blather on about how unfair it all is, and has even used it to single out all the people who 'persecuted' him during his time at University by racial group. It's all just one giant Jooooooooish Conspiracy you know!

I admire the editorial line of Harry's Place for the most part. Yet when faced with clear documentary evidence of racism and extremism, they just can't quite bring themselves to disown someone 'of the Left' for actions which would have brought universal editorial opprobrium had they been committed by anyone 'of the Right'.

Maybe that's why they have taken over so many of our institutions, and poisoned our culture so effectively. Because when it comes down to it, even basically decent Lefties are still willing to give the nutters the benefit of the doubt on grounds of their theoretical base ideology, and are united by that ideological bond. Whereas the Right is endlessly fractured along lines of moral and principle on individual issues and questions and absolutely refuses, often to its cost politically, to compromise and indulge in any but the tiniest amount of groupthink. When it does make serious attempts to (UKIP's endless infighting being an obvious example) the results are always similar to a ship being steered by five or six different people at the same time, with others constantly clamouring to be allowed to take the wheel because only they really know where the ship should be going.

I'm pretty sure I qualify as being 'of the Right', and I rather admire those who refuse to compromise their morals and principles for political expediency even when I disagree with those particular mores. But there are times when I do wistfully wonder what it would be like to be just a little bit more united against the bad guys...

And then I look at the "power for power's sake" Cameroonites and the 'proper' Left, and realise that actually, no, I'll go with the principled infighting, thanks.

The Heroic Death Of Arsehd Orcbuggerer

2009-09-13T16:19:00.003+01:00

The Dwarf swung his axe in a frenzy, furiously trying to finish the two Bainite Clerics before the towering Hobgoblin chieftain could reach him. He whirled to see the Wizard dart forward and hurl his final Colour Spray spell at the knot of Hobgoblins surrounding Red, and grinned as he saw the Cleric slam his spiked chain into the one left standing with massive effect. The green-skinned creature staggered to his knees, shield falling limply from his shattered arm.

Red swung again, and the Wizard stepped daintily back from the sudden blood spray as the creature's jaw was torn off in a welter of gore.

Then the chieftain was on Arsehd, and his awareness narrowed down to fending off the flashing swords striking at him. His shield was notched already, and the new foe wasn't making the task of continued survival easier.

Arsehd didn't see the Bainite Priest who had sent so much weakening magic at him fall to Red's chain and the Halfling's arrows. He didn't see the sword which pierced his back, though he did have the satisfaction of watching the enemy Cleric who had stabbed him fall to his axe as he swung backwards to respond. He turned desperately to counter the chieftain's attempt to take advantage, and saw the Halfling running as fast he could to intervene.

Time slowed. Arsehd knew he was too late, knew he couldn't block in time. And an eternity later the Hobgoblin chieftain finally swept his shield aside and thrust into his ribs, bursting his armour asunder even as he slammed a final blow forwards to scythe into his enemy's meaty thigh. Blood spurted, some his own, and some his enemy's, and he felt the satisfaction of feeling his foe's warm life on his face.

And then that life and his own death became one.

Amber got to game with us Saturday afternoon and evening, seeing as one of players was on holdiay and not working the weekend as usual. It was the first time she ever lost a character, in this case a Non-Player Character I'd been running to flesh out the group and give them some muscle. We are going to write 'RIP' on Arsehd's character sheet and give it to her to put up on her wall.

She gets to choose the next NPC. It seems only fair.

Walking Like A Duck

2009-09-12T19:19:00.004+01:00

Riddle me this. If the BNP (or, to internationalise things, the Republican Party) employed a senior official with an enormous fetish for Nazi memorabilia, who posted on multiple 'memorabilia' websites, authored his own highly expensive tract on the subject, posed for pictures wearing a T-Shirt with an Iron Cross and a WW2 Nazi slogan on it, drove a vehicle with the licence plate 'Flak88' and posted under the same name on numerous 'memorabilia' forums, would the MSM be somewhat...silent on the subject, especially if that senior official had authored a rather large number of extremely anti-Israel 'reports' for his organisation of choice?

I'm thinking maybe a big fat No. In fact, I'm thinking the headlines would be screaming 'BNP/Republican Nazi Fetishist Has Heil Hitler Licence Plate'. But, when the anti-Israelism is coming from an Official Leftie writing for an Official Leftie NGO which has since accused anyone pointing out the facts of merely attempting to maliciously cover up for the crimes of the dastardly Jews, those crickets are chirping like there's no tomorrow.

If it walks like a Duck, or goosesteps like a Nazi for that matter...

Marc Garlasco, absolutely not a Jew-hating Nazi scumbag, honest.

(Tip of the hat to the last bastion of the decent Left, Harry's Place)

Dear Truthers...

2009-09-11T13:58:00.004+01:00

...I shall be avoiding any and all 9/11 related threads on any Blog or other website today. Because you make me want to slap you repeatedly about the head with a wet fish, Monty Python style, until you're so dazed you can't spout your insane babble any more. And then maybe, just maybe, the fact that you are a colossally stupid and desperate person will sink into your tiny brain and you will then wish to throw yourself into the nearest river in disgust at your own appalling pointlessness.

I don't like Truthers much, as you might have guessed. To me they have exactly the same mentality as Holocaust Deniers, whom the eldest and I had a lengthy discussion about a couple of days ago. That mentality is born of a twofold aberration - the first is an obsessive hatred of either a group or person (Bush/Evil Nazi Republicans, Jews), and the second is usually an admiration for and a desire to excuse or even abrogate in the public mind the crimes of another group or person (Nazis, Islamic Fundamentalists - well all right, bit of an oxymoron there but still). Each form of this has its own uniquely revolting aspects - and with Trutherism its the ever-increasing convergence with actual Holocaust Denial and denialists which makes me even madder still.

Over at Tangled Web an American contributor, as might reasonably be expected on today of all days, posted a link to video footage of the first plane striking the Towers this morning. And sure enough, the first couple of pages of comments on the Youtube video were filled with nutballs saying things as cogent and well argued as 'Bush did 9/11'.

Some people engage with Truthers, try to debate them, turn them back to some semblance of sanity using sweet reason. I personally prefer the wet fish option. It's far more likely to succeed, and dammit, it's just so much more satisfying.

Those of us with brains tuned to Sanity FM remember what happened on September 11th 2001, and we remember with perfect clarity. We know who was responsible. We don't need to hear about fifth planes, about Israeli tourists or how there were no Jews in the Twin Towers on the day, or how Alex Jones' radio show is really cool, man.

We remember. And we don't ever, ever forget.

The Antidote to Twilight Mania

2009-09-10T22:37:00.002+01:00

After the amusing but occasionally disturbing experience of babysitting a Twilight-obsessed seven year old overnight last week, it seems that the mania surrounding this distinctly pedestrian part of the overall pantheon of Vampire mythologies has spread still further.

The eldest's first French homework assignment is to produce a picture of 'a celebrity' from the Net and to annotate the pic with the celeb's hair and eye colour. She confidently assured me that all the girls in her class were going to pick either the ridiculously coiffured Robert Pattinson (previously an uppercrust Harry Potter schoolboy) or the always entertaining Kristen Stewart (well alright, maybe not a hugely talented actress but I'm a sucker for that particular kind of facial structure).

Well, today she asked the rest of the class in advance of tomorrow's French lesson and sure enough, at least seven have picked Pattinson and at least three Stewart, which led us to come up with a way to stymie the Twilight mania and hopefully break the ice with the new teacher.

We imagined the scene...

"So X, who is your celebrity?"

"Robert Pattinson, Madame."

"Very good, X. Brown hair and grey eyes, oui. Now, how about you, Y?"

"Robert Pattinson, Madame."

"I see. And you, Z?"

"Robert Pattinson, Madame."

"You know, class, this isn't much of an exercise if everyone's answer is 'My celebrity has brown hair and grey eyes'. Can everyone who didn't pick Robert Pattinson raise their hands? Good. Now, B, who did you pick?"

"Kristen Stewart, Madame."

"Aha, black hair and brown eyes, excellent. How about you, C?"

"Kristen Stewart, Madame."

Sigh...

"Very well, could everyone who picked Kristen Stewart lower their hands...now, that leaves...ah, Amber. What colour is your celebrity's hair?"

"Ma célébrité a les cheveux bleus, Madame!"

This Week's Alan Duncan Award for Utter Arrogance

2009-09-10T21:35:00.005+01:00

This will be a weekly award, I've decided. It shall go to the most completely arrogant swine who sticks their head over the battlements in order to show their contempt for the plebian hordes whose existence they are forced to reluctantly endure. This week's recipient is a no-brainer, as via the wonderful JuliaM we have the execrable Hugh Orde, President of the Association of Chief Police Officers.

"If you have a system whereby anyone can stand to be elected as the local police commissioner, you could have any Tom, Dick or Harriet standing."

There are no words. Well, that's not true. There's 'undemocratic'. There's 'elitist'. There's 'liberal politician', which is something of an oxymoron after the first two, it has to be said. And make no mistake folks, in Britain 2009 you don't get to be President of ACPO, the elite gold standard of PC Policing, without being a politician, and one of those undemocratic, elitist liberal ones at that.

Just so we're really sure that we're not misunderstanding him in his apparent contempt for the general public he is supposed to serve, Sir Hugh continues...

"Do they think that the public are so interested in policing that they would turn out and vote? And for whom? A politician? Or do they mind if they get a lunatic or a retired copper? All of these questions need to be answered."

See, I think when this weasel says 'lunatic', what he means is 'person who would expect me to encourage my officers to do their jobs and actually deal with criminals regardless of skin colour, ethnicity or social circumstances'. I also think the public are exactly interested enough in policing to elect such a 'lunatic' given half a chance. It's Sir Hugh and his serried ranks of pointless PC PCs who aren't interested in policing, and the idea that they might end up with bosses who are absolutely terrifies them.

So, this week's Alan Duncan Award goes to Sir Hugh Orde, for sheer undiluted contempt for the general public. I think it should look like this...

Lulu's Favourite Video

2009-09-10T17:12:00.002+01:00

I'm quite the fan of the very short-lived Swing Revival, and this wonderfully jumping video gets wheeled out during the post-mealtime cleanup, as both the beat and the visuals seem to fascinate her no end. She is now often to be heard singing the notes preceeding the chorus in perfect time, which is a bit scary for sixteen months frankly. Tragically of course once she is able to interpret said visuals and the lyrics rather better it will probably have to be mothballed, but for now, enjoy the frenetic swing goodness that is the Cherry Poppin Daddies.

(And yes, I know it's only a matter of time before the eldest figures out what the band name means. That bridge will be crossed etc.)

I'm Back. Maybe. Er.

2009-09-10T09:59:00.004+01:00

I'm back. Maybe. I'm not sure if I'm going to have the time to start this Blogging thing again properly or not.

I've been posting the odd bit of political comment here. But much as I admire David Vance, who runs the place, he is far too nice to the Jew-hating Leftie (with a handful of exceptions) trolls who infest the comments with their lunatic dribblings - for example 'are Jews the new master race?' is fine by them, but telling the person who posted it to Fuck Off And Die is deeply offensive, dont'cha know.

I don't think I'll miss it. When you go and visit a site you are part of the team for and leave there more annoyed than when you arrived, it's time to wave bye-bye and part company.

So will it be more of the same over here? Well, ironically what turned out to be the final DSD post seemed to gain me not a few new pals, judging by the emails and links I received from it. Reading it back now, seems even if I do say so myself that I was remarkably prescient in my prediction as to what was going to happen to the Republican nomination and the Party itself if it went as predicted and they chose a softly-softly moderate with all the fire of a disposable barbecue in his belly. As my favourite Blogger observed, you can take the MSM to bed as often as you like during the nomination process and it might feel good while it lasts, but it absolutely will not call you in the morning once the campaign has started.

So there'll be as much political commentary as I can manage, as that was after all this Blog's original stock-in-trade. But there will also be as much family and life in general stuff as I can fit in, as I did feel guilty about ceasing the "I'm a Dad again, oh joy" Blogging venture in-between then and now, the Lulu Blog. But we went through a spate of illness, the subject herself went through a spate of being somewhat...demanding - mostly between about 1 and 4am - and all gradually fell by the wayside as these things so often do.

I'll also post the odd bit of Youtubeyness, just because I can and I like sharing music. I promise a minimum of insanely heavy metal and that the song material (or title at the very least) will be as relevant as possible to whatever's topical at the time, fair enough?

There'll also be Gaming stuff. Yes, I am still into all that strange dicerolling and character-acting business, and am writing and running those even stranger LARP thingies now. In fact tomorrow night a new game begins, and I will be playing a geriatric old character of as yet indetermined type, the only certainty in my mind as yet that he will say things like "I remember when all this was battlefields" a lot.

So, there it is. I'm back. I think. Maybe. We'll have to wait and see.

(Oh and Comments will be moderated. Complainants about freedom of speech and stuff can apply to the Diversity Officer of IDon'tGiveACrap plc, understood? Though to be honest I generally allow Nazi muppets to post however, because its just so much fun to play with them. If you do it right you can get the ones with real delusions of grandeur to spend entire days at the keyboard working themselves up into a lather by only spending a minute or two of your own time. Try it sometime, it's most rewarding.)

A View From Across The Pond

2007-04-25T10:33:00.000+01:00

There are plenty of blogthreads and articles floating around about how us Brits view the Americans in cultural terms. Usually they are either lambasting the US for its supposed crudity in terms that are themselves so crude that they end up creating an unintentional caricature of the author rather than the society he/she is attempting to portray. Occasionally a brighter commentator will suddenly realise that, hey, without these guys we would quite possibly be wearing brown boiler suits and be reading Das Kapital rather than the Sun with our breakfasts and will give a nod to the awesome debt that is owed the American people, and as matters progress in the slowly crumbling monolith that is Europe I suspect will be renewed afresh.

But only, and I stress the word, if one of the most fascinating battles in American political history has the right outcome.

The battle I refer to is not that for the Presidency, unusual though it is in that neither the incumbent President or VP is running for office. The battle is the one for, from this outsider's POV, nothing less than the heart and soul of the Republican Party.

Republican officialdom (what we in the UK often refer to as the Party Hierarchy) is at a crossroads at this moment. The relentless Leftist bias of the US media is beginning to succeed in the final stages of its mission to achieve a tectonic, permanent shift in the perceived location of 'centreground' of multiple issues in US Politics. But it can only complete that mission if senior Republicans (including the Commander-in-Chief himself) allow themselves to heed the seductive call of that perceived middleground.

Because its easy, you see. Really easy, in fact. Easy to accept the consensus on a multiplicity of issues, and narrow down the things that a politician really needs to actually have a position on. So much easier to let their be bipartisan agreement to, you know, not really discuss certain things because the decision about what people think has already been made. And the leading contenders in the Republican primary race are already starting to show signs of this consensus forming, without drawing anyone's attention to the fact.

Take immigration, for example. Well if there's one thing which could bury McCain with the Republican Party, its the so-called Guest Worker Program, which it is painfully obvious is nothing more than an amnesty for illegal immigrants. But Giuliani supports it with very little reservation. Mitt Romney on his own website gives the issue of immigration a huge seven lines, showing the obvious depth of his feelings on the matter. Whilst decrying illegal immigration (but not, it should be noted, calling for the removal of illegal immigrants or even stating a policy position on that issue) he says quite openly that he wants to see even more 'legal' immigration into the US, as if the only part of the immigration issue worth mentioning is whether or not a person entered the country illegally or not.

Even Gingrich, the still unannounced not-so-dark horse in this race, broadly supports it, though he at least is clear as to the issue's immense importance for America's future. However, having spent an amount of time making it clear that he understands that America's cultural integrity and demographic is being destroyed by mass immigration, he then begins to do his best impression of that seductive voice from the centreground, which has only the best interests of those who have entered America to leech from its body politic...

"Note that none of the above requires direct action against people who are here illegally. None of these steps will break up families or cause undue hardship."

Unlike the hardship felt by Americans who have had to support the enormous burden of healthcare, ever-rising crime, falling wages due to cheap labour...

"As we transform our immigration system from a dishonest to an honest one, it is understandable that those living and working here illegally — especially those who have lived and worked here illegally for a long period of time — would be anxious and fearful about the future. While our two-decade-long failure does not mean that we are required to maintain a dishonest system, it does mean that must have a humanitarian period of transition as we replace an illegal channel of immigration with a legal one."

Oh, the humanity. This, remember, is the current top 'Real Conservative' candidate for the Presidency folks, unannounced or not. Warms the heart that he has such concern for people who have been enjoying his country's benefits at the working man's expense for 'a long period of time'.

Gingrich says this 'isnt an amnesty'. I cannot imagine what else allowing a huge mass of illegal immigrants to stay in his own country is if it isnt an amnesty.

But there it is, folks. Probably the single most important issue facing America today (and I include the War on Terror in that - fighting Jihad abroad is pointless while a nation rots from within) and well lookee here - there's that handy consensus from the Big Four of the Republican Party. Mass Immigration is good - as long as its legal, and hey presto, we can make it so by spending your tax dollars on turning the people who have been driving down your wages, hoovering up your Healthcare, into new 'legal' immigrants.

I'm sure some American readers are blinking slightly in the face of this onslaught on what must be in some cases their favoured candidates. Where does this uppity Brit get off telling us what's wrong with our candidates? Where does he get this great insight into where our beloved GOP is stumbling toward?

The answer, ladies and gents, is simple experience. Here in my own country, we've had this 'handy consensus' thing going on for a very, very long time now - and on far more issues than Immigration. Our opposition 'Conservative' Party sold its soul to a smooth-talking, photogenic liberal Devil called David Cameron in an act of political calculation which set the seal on our media's campaign to shift the centreground firmly to the Left.

Immigration is the issue which must not be named unless it is to celebrate the increased Diversity (for which read destruction) of our culture. Those small Parties that do are decried as racists, neo-nazis, fascists etc - by our supposed 'conservatives' as well as the Left.

EU Membership? Well once again, our 'Eurosceptic' opposition now has a leader who states quite clearly that he would never have a 'Eurosceptic' in his Cabinet.

The Taxation debate? What Taxation Debate? Again, the three main Parties have decided that Britain should be and must remain a High-Tax, High-Spend, High-Debt economy.

Yet still desperate members of the Conservative opposition continue to campaign for a Party which no longer even vaguely represents their views on the important issues, with a leader who is so far removed from the reality of their lives that his most (in)famous speech to date was a call to understand 'hoodie' criminals (as opposed to jailing them) by giving them a hug.

Any of this sounding familiar to any of you 'lifelong Republicans'? Because if it isnt sounding familiar yet, its going to very shortly.

The GOP is your Party, boys and girls. Its not McCain's, Giuliani's, Romney's, Gingrich's or even ultimate George Bush's Party. And if you settle for a compromise candidate now who isn't prepared to represent your views, who is prepared to kowtow to the 'handy consensus', then if you get him elected you'll very quickly find that you won the Presidential battle just fine...

...but lost the War to save America.

(Cross-posted at The Wide Awakes)

No Offence Mr Hart, But Not Likely

2007-04-22T00:12:00.000+01:00

Regarding the below post, Mr Hart has indicated that he will not give his solicitor's details out without my first giving my private address. Obviously as he is in correspondence with leading lights in the terror-supporting Manchester 'anti-war' movement, this is not going to happen.

Mr Hart has a history of preemptive threats of litigation, including by his own admission apparently sending one of his books to the Board of Jewish Deputies with a warm note attached threatening legal action in advance should they adversely comment on it!

He is, as I have said to him, obviously an intelligent man. I can understand an AK-47-waving Palestinian or British Muslim seriously believing this stuff, but for an educated man to do so leads to the conclusion of anti-semitism. But (and here's the rub) is 'anti-semitism' a crime of intent, or a crime of prejudice? If someone has preconceptions about Jews that are offensive and negative and propogates those views accordingly, but doesnt feel an actual *animosity* towards them, are they guilty of anti-semitism?

And which category does Alan Hart fit into? That, ladies and gents, is the 64,000 dollar question...

Answering An Anti-Semite's Challenge

2007-04-21T18:27:00.000+01:00

Dear Alan Hart,

You are an anti-semite. You say you will sue anyone identifying themselves who says so. So post your solicitor's contact details in the comments and I'll stitch you up even better in court than David Irving. I've left the same message on your Blog, though comment moderation means it'll never be seen.

Bring it on.

(Cross-posted with a disclaimer added at A Tangled Web)

English Only Poll

2007-04-12T22:24:00.000+01:00

"Scotland should immediately be granted full political and financial independence from the rest of the United Kingdom, and vice versa."

Please vote Yes or No and feel free to give your reasons.

Hey, No Worries, Its Just Legitimate Criticism Of Israel, Right?

2007-04-12T09:49:00.000+01:00

...or not. S'funny though when you think about it. A swastika-waving Neo-Nazi group produces a leaflet saying that if you join the US Army you are fighting for Israel and features a stereotypical bignosed Jew giving orders to a US soldier...this would no doubt be called anti-semitic in nature by all but the most rabid of commentators. And yet...

Waving flags of organisations dedicated to killing Jews and destroying Israel at a Leftist rally? That's 'showing solidarity with the poor oppressed Palestinians'.

Waving banners calling Jews 'Zionist pigs' with fanged demons wearing Israeli skullcaps in the background at a Leftist? 'Legitimate criticism'.

'No blood for Israel' signs at a Leftwing rally? 'Hey, that's because, you know, Israel, you know, leaned on the US somehow to invade Iraq, right? We have absolutely no proof of this but, well what about AIPAC and the Jewish, whoops, sorry Zionist lobby?'

Let me repeat, all these messages are Leftwing messages, found at every so-called 'antiwar' rally, found on every Leftist Blog such as the increasingly vile and more importantly openly anti-Jewish Daily Kos. Leftist opinion journals like Counterpunch carry this kind of material constantly...here's a subtle and tasty quote which puts me in mind of a cockroach running for the darkness at the mere thought of having the light shined on it...this is how Counterpunch writer
Arthur Neslen feels about the latest report (not suppressed this time thankfully) on anti-semitism from the EU.

'Anti-Semitism', its report began, 'is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred'. Such a perception could include stereotypical or dehumanising libels about, for example: "The power of Jews as a collective - such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions."

But it could also include a litany of lobbyist shibboleths, such as:

"Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination (e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor); Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation... Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis; Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel."

Uh-huh. So whilst he wouldnt dream of thinking of himself as an anti-Semite, Neslen feels that claiming the very existence of Israel is racist and that its actions are comparable to Nazism is legitimate criticism. Expecting Israel to behave to a totally different standard of behaviour than every other nation? Not at all unreasonable! Collective responsibility (hmmm, where have we heard that one before, could it be from Leftists like Neslen whining that the security fence which has so drastically reduced terror attacks on Israeli soil is 'collective punishment' for the Palestinians?) ? Perfectly fine and dandy - as long as it is only applied to the Jews.

Ironically, Neslen claims himself (without evidence of course) to have been a victim of anti-semitism from...you guessed it, the BNP! Who he then goes on to mention (broadly) supported Israel's efforts against Hezbollah in Lebanon - you'd think that might be food for thought for someone who is 'definitely not an anti-semite' but most definitely didnt express the same support for anyone but Hezbollah themselves...

Its when Neslen comments on Palestinian anti-semitism though, that his true colours really show through.

"Certainly, some Palestinians talk about 'Yehuds' in a derogatory fashion, cite libellous texts without forethought and make foolish statements about the Holocaust. But that's what happens to language when you step on someone's throat."

'A derogatory fashion'?!? Palestinian schools feature literature, teaching and posters with subtle and tasty quotes such as 'Killing a Jew brings you closer to God'. Libellous texts? Well, after the Koran, Mein Kampf is currently the bestselling book in the Arab world. And the PA is currently run by Mahmoud Abbas, a man whose doctoral thesis was, you guessed it, a denial of the Holocaust.

What kind of person can interpret the undeniably genocidal nature of the Palestinian attitude to Jews as 'talking about them in a derogatory fashion'? Only one kind, the same kind that genuinely believes that Israel is 'stepping on Palestinian throats' by protecting itself and that claiming the very existence of the world's only Jewish State is racist is perfectly legitimate.

At least the people who distributed the literature in Berkeley are honest about their racism and their hatred. The anti-semites of the Left dont even have that to commend them.

(Cross-posted at A Tangled Web)

Kick The Dogs

2007-04-06T10:17:00.000+01:00

Via the wonderful House of Dumb, we have another piece of Tory PC lunacy to either laugh or cry at, depending on your political allegiances. This time its that luverly photogenic 'Muslim female in a suit' that the Tories love to trot out from time to time, such as afer 7/7 when she called for dialogue with the bombers' colleagues in a statement that had a marked lack of exhortations to, you know, bring them to justice.

Yes folks, the latest piece of cuddly Tory nuttiness is this: rejected asylum-seekers should be given a 'revokable' licence to work. That's right. People who have come to Europe's most liberal asylum regime and whose claims have finally filtered through the labyrinthine system of bloodsucking advocacy lawyers and Home Office encouragement and still have had their claims found to be so laughably false that they are rejected should be...allowed to stay here anyway.

I liked this bit best:

"They are unable to work or contribute to society, unable to leave and sleeping rough."

Uh-huh. So now rejected asylum-seekers are 'unable to leave'. Lady, that's the Government's job. I appreciate that its going to leave a wee carbon footprint to put the small percentage of failed asylum seekers in Britain on a plane back to their point of origin, but then again hopefully this would be our poor impoverished asylum-seeker's only flight that year anyway, fulfilling another of Blu-Labour's nutty policies.

Quite apart from the general lunacy of the Tory hierarchy in abandoning any pretence whatsoever that they are going to control mass immigration into Britain, what should we make of the loyal diehards at Conservative Home? Those 'true-blues', spinning frantically along as they try to make sense of their leadership's latest kick in the teeth to everything they believe in, usually by, as can be seen, blaming the messenger as if any such message in the 2007 Tory Party is issued without the approval of Central Office.

The Tory hierarchy figured out some time ago that it is possible to come up with any Policy, make any statement, perform any action no matter how antithetic to the beliefs of the Conservative membership, and still have that membership deliver the leaflets, send the money, put in the effort and generally roll onto its back to have its collective tummy scratched come election time.

These true-blue doggies have been kicked so many times that it seems they've actually started to like it.

(Cross-posted at A Tangled Web)

Educational Matters

2007-03-29T19:11:00.000+01:00

I have passed my Childcare NVQ, I am informed today. Ironically enough just a fortnight after giving up part-time Nursery work to fulltime homeschool my ten-year-old.

The daughter is on a bit of a roll this week - yes we've had the rellies down from the land of Mills and whippets which disrupted work in the beginning part of the week, but on the other hand she has produced a stunning piece of work on American Isolationism in WW2 this morning after watching the World At War episode on that subject yesterday. Lindbergh, Willkie, Roosevelt - all the major personalities are there, with a damn accurate timeline of events as well. She is now upstairs reading about the Battle of Midway, the first naval battle in history which exclusively consisted of air-ship combat.

She worked late today to finish a piece on Mummification (our current Religious Studies/History area is Ancient Egypt). That's a work ethic you dont find either encouraged or present at school - she went some twenty minutes over time but got a 10/10 for Content which is almost unheard of from me in the ten weeks or so we've been doing this, fascist taskmaster that I am.

We have our first 'inspection' tomorrow morning. The LEA (which wouldntbe there under a UKIP Government, maybe best not to mention that) likes to make six-monthly checks to see what resources/methods are being used and to check progress, apparently. Some of the more militant homeschooling parents of our acquaintance have advised us not to let anyone into our home, which true enough we dont have to do. However we are quite confident that a ten-year old who spends two hours looking at Wikipedia records of US Presidential Elections and asking questions about the personalities involved isnt going to be deemed not to be fulfilling her potential...

Its scary how fast she is coming along at home. Last week she scored 80% on a Maths paper intended for children 18 months further along, and Maths is her poorest subject! Huge improvements in handwriting, grammar, and general presentation. This in ten weeks. Is this a compliment to our teaching methods? Not especially I suspect. Its much more an indictment of the first degree murder of British Education in the last thirty years of Politically Correct Leftist lunacy.

The fear? Not that we aren't doing a good enough job educating her at home, but that she will be so far ahead of the curve when she goes back for High School that she gets bored.

What a country.

Bread And Circuses

2007-03-28T17:47:00.000+01:00

A very deep conversation took place last night with Mrs Right-Wing Zionist Conspirator, who is currently in wailing and gnashing of teeth mode after she began to truly contemplate what our benighted country has allowed to be done to itself.

How have we let our politicians do this to us, she wanted to know? How is it that we have sleepwalked into a situation where the only Parties most people feel can win anything have already magnanimously decided the outcome of the big issues for us so we dont have to trouble ourselves - Mass Immigration, Crime, EU Membership, Taxation, Welfare and Benefits, the Environment. The cracks between those Parties policies are now so minute you could barely drive a UKIP by-election vote through them.

Pick a major issue where any of the three 'main parties' are offering practical proposals (as opposed to empty rhetoric such as pretend Conservative 'euroscepticism') which genuinely differ from each other. Pick five, or ten. It doesnt matter. Those issues simply no longer exist. We have sleepwalked into a situation where minor voices such as UKIP can be financially attacked by the supposedly impartial Electoral Commission for clerical errors yet the Lib Dem voices of consensus can take donations from convicted felons who dont live in Britain and be allowed to keep the cash. A situation where BNP members can be forced out of their jobs (or be barred from serving in certain professions in the first place) simply for their political affiliation.

So how did we get here? The answer is simple - bread and circuses. Our corrupt and compliant media from the BBC to the Guardian to the Daily Mail has now become so debased and in thrall to the 'Great Consensus' of British Politics that there is virtually no voice outside of the Internet which provides a true departure from that consensus. Our minds are dulled into insensitivity and indifference by 'reality TV', playstations and, yes, a willing, government sponsored and at times almost ridiculously cartoonish enemy to vent our spleen at in the form of radical Islam.

The justification for each raft of new 'anti-terrorism' laws is that they are required to meet the threat of the Islamists, though the word 'terrorism' is used with a nudge-nudge, wink-wink 'you know who we are talking about though' moment from whichever Home Secretary is able to tear himself away from his secretary. But I and many others have come round, often slowly and painfully, to the conclusion that these laws (and those propogated by the EU such as ID Cards and the European Arrest Warrant - which for the uninitiated was proposed before 9/11 and rushed through with ill-concealed glee afterward) are nothing but measures designed to take tight control of a population made pliant by the need to deal with the domestic Islamic threat which our Government encourages and propogates at every turn.

If this Government was serious about combatting terrorism we would not be seeing the despicable spectacle now being played out in Ulster. We would not be seeing radical Islam protected, coddled and encouraged at every opportunity. We would not be seeing the deliberate propogation of an ideology thoroughly inimical to our supposedly democratic way of life at the same time as measures designed to combat its violent manifestations are being rushed through all the time, each one more draconian and greater in their potential for tyranny against our entire population than the next.

Britain, the once-great nation which defied Nazism (and Communism), has sunk low indeed. We are sleepwalking into the end of our democracy, and we are showing no signs of waking.

(Cross-posted at A Tangled Web)

How To Really Annoy A Racist

2007-03-26T00:27:00.000+01:00

Actually call him one. Bless him, not content with posting about me about every third or fourth article, he has even given me my own Tag! He is also either very dumb or a serious liar, because he keeps wittering on about the fact that I have comment moderation on. Apparently I keep burying his comments, or so he keeps telling his audience. He has actually managed to put a vaguely coherent argument together on another thread, but is now pretending that he posted a comment on this thread regarding the Local Elections, which is quite simply a lie.

Its depressing how quickly someone who (when he isnt in pure vitriol mode) is actually capable of being fairly convincing descends to simple untruths. Still, its upping my site traffic, so cheers Phil, its much more fun getting help from an enemy than a friend...

The Leopard Quietly Grows His Spots Back

2007-03-25T11:06:00.000+01:00

Strange as it might seem for my first ATW post, it is a Guardian article I wish to highlight for all to peruse. It concerns the plight of the opposition parties in Russia, deepened further by Putin's lackeys in the Supreme Court outlawing the small Republican Party in a move which reduces the official opposition to just three parties, former Chess champion Gary Kasparov's United Civil Front, the National Bolsheviks, and the Popular Democratic Union.

Those of us with long memories remember all the Russian technology found within Iraq during the first Gulf War, and the Russian listening posts which were picked up by radio but never positively identified. Russia of course has a long history of providing weapons and aid to Arab States, even to the point of threatening military intervention during Arab-Israeli conflicts should Israel actually launch full-scale retalitaory invasions having defeated the Arab armies. Even today it was one of the first nations to recognise the Hamas terror government, indicating its continued willingness to maintain ties with the West's enemies in the Middle East. As the USSR it used proxies throughout the world to attempt to destabilise and stretch the West militarily, but was always to some extent hampered in this goal by having its own military capability hamstrung by the need to internally administer such vast tracts of territory, many of them containing ethnically homogenous population groups which were at best uncooperative and even at times downright rebellious.

Now of course the new Russia is unburdened by many of those unruly population groups, and is quietly but carefully rebuilding the previously rotting infrastructure of its military. It has become aware that it can wield huge political power against Europe by use of energy supplies and of course by the EU's eternal willingness to barter massive bargaining chips away for the sake of 'goodwill' when it comes to the democratic aspirations of its nominal client governments such as that of Belarus.

It was just a few days ago that somebody chastised Tom Tyler on an ATW thread for 'missing the fall of Communism'. Well, Communism may have fallen, but its traditions and (for the 'ethnic Russians') legacy of powerseeking definitely lives on. Welded into one leaner state, with a resurgent military and iron-hard dictatorial power, the 'new Russia' is it seems beginning to turn back into an entity the West should once again learn to regard with the utmost caution.

(Cross-posted at A Tangled Web)

Pot Condems Kettle Excesses

2007-03-22T14:47:00.000Z

(Seen and sniggered at over at Harry's Place...)

"Too much focus on difference can spill over into separateness, which subverts an appreciation of our common humanity and undermines notions of universal rights and equal citizenship. It can produce a new form of tribalism, where societies are fragmented into myriad communities, each loyal primarily to itself and with little interest in the common good of society as a whole."

Actually quite sensible words really. A better condemnation of the excesses of multiculturalism is rarely to be found. Quite ironic that its coming from this man really.

So, let me get this straight, this is *Peter Tatchell* bemoaning the forming of individual communities loyal only to themselves and pursuing nothing but their own selfish agendas at the expense of the feelings, rights and needs of the rest of society.

Bwahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

Seems Only Fair

2007-03-21T13:01:00.000Z

It has been suggested that I am unfairly BNP-bashing of late, and being rather unfair to Mr Griffin and his motley crew by focussing unfair attention on some of the Party's more unsavoury sympathisers. So in the interests of parity, I give you Mr David Noakes, exemplar of the fruitcake, 'swivel eyed loon' tendency of the UK Independence Party.

Mr Noakes, it should be pointed out, is no longer a member of UKIP, just as Philip 'monkeys have longer arms than humans' Bryant isnt a member of the BNP. However he was a leadership candidate last year. I visited his website during the campaign as I did all the candidates, and found that he was most definitely of the 'the only thing matters is the EU' wing of UKIP. I also found that in Mr Noakes we have a truly obsessed 'anti-' person. His website, EU Truth is an awful mishmash of anti-EU points strung together with some depressingly familiar bits of nonsense from the Leftist playbook, such as this:

"Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did not need democratic authorisation. Just two senior police officers authorised the police to kill British people. A democratic vote by Parliament was not required, but even that would not have legalised the killing under British common law. A recent victim was an innocent Brazilian, Jean de Menezes, shot dead in Stockwell underground station, even though he was being held down by police officers at the time of the execution. The police used dum-dum bullets, outlawed under the Geneva Convention because they blow a man to pieces inside."

Firstly, de Menezes wasnt a British citizen - he was an illegal immigrant who had been working without paying Tax for some time, and whose family have links to some of Brazil's worst Marxist terror groups. He was being held down by Police Officers because they thought he was about to detonate a bomb that would have killed everyone for some radius, having run from armed Police Officers and grabbed another Tube passenger after exiting the same block of flats used by the four incompetent failed suicide bombers currently on trial. Also, there are several different types of hollow point bullets, and none are banned by the Geneva Convention unless it can be shown that they cause 'unnecessary suffering'.

EU Law here has absolutely nothing to do with the de Menezes case. These were not Europol officers, these were British ones and this is not an area in which the EU had any involvement whatsoever. It is police-bashing, pure and simple.

There is more of the same later on. Straight out of the Leftist playbook, once again.

"The tendancy to pick on Muslims, as Germany used to pick on Jews, has already begun. Europe will be a very nasty place."

What arrant, utter nonsense. Its interesting that Noakes chooses to identify with everyone's favourite victim group as a way of bashing the EU, showing his total ignorance of the EU's enormous protectiveness over its Islamic population even to the point of suppressing reports on anti-semitism which blamed Europe's Muslims as the main culprit!

And just to reinforce his wholescale adoption of 'anti-everything', Noakes decides to end his ramblings by linking here to what I assume is another of his ranting sites. Bush Derangement Syndrome to the max, baby! Bush the satanist, Bush the coke dealer, Bush the vote rigger who supposedly removed hundreds of thousands of democrat voters from the Florida Electoral Roll at the last minute, oh my...

So, why Noakes? Why go after him in particular? DSD got nothing better to do while his daughter finishes a Maths exercise?

This is why. There is a very big problem with UKIP in that every time it has a leadership contest the losers almost all throw their toys out of the pram within a few months of losing. And Noakes, having lost, spent some time accusing Nigel Farage of first of all 'smearing', then internal corruption and now says that the entire UKIP leadership is in the pay of the EU and is 'suppressing anti-EU activities'.

Noakes' anti-EU' activities generally have in the past consisted of embarassing the present leadership by engaging in 'swivel-eyed loon' activities (and of course utterances) which help no one and help reinforce the image of UKIP the media and of course David Cameron would like to generate in the minds of the public. And in his letter he singles out UKIP's southwest organiser Malcolm Wood for the majority of his bile - once again having lost a leadership contest, albeit on a smaller scale.

For the uninitiated, let me explain something about UKIP's MEPs and Regional Coordinators, especially Malcom Wood. They spend a minimal amount of time in Brussels, generally appearing only to provide a voice of opposition during what is laughably called the 'debates'. Unlike the rest of the parasitic lowlifes we call MEPs they do not spend the rest of that time idle. They spend it driving around the country to meeting after meeting, addressing crowds large and small and they drive themselves pretty damn hard.

They also scour the regulations and documents which the Commission produces and pass the nastiest of them out to sympathetic journalists. Remember all those shock horror headlines in the Mail and the Sun about the dreaded European Constitution? Who do you think passed the drafts out to Simon Heffer, who then raised blue murder in the offices of the Mail until they began running stories on it? Nigel Farage, Graham Booth and Jeremy Titford of UKIP, thats who! Those of us in UKIP were aware of the appalling nature of the Constitution long before the Tories belatedly picked up on it. Yet all those Tory MEPs in Brussels were quite happy for the document to be enshrined over us all until the Mail ran headlines on it.

UKIP did that. Say thank you, boys and girls.

Now, I've known Malcolm Wood for a very long time. In fact he chaired the meeting where I agreed to be Vice-Chairman for the Christchurch constituency way back in 2001, only to become Chairman when the incumbent resigned through ill health shortly afterward. In all the time I spent with UKIP I can honestly say that I have rarely met a more dedicated, hardworking and thoroughly anti-EU individual than Malcolm Wood. He covers by any reasonable estimate at least a thousand miles a week driving around the Southwest of England to chair and help arrange meetings. During the General Election campaign he visited dozens of Constituencies to give encouragement and moral support to UKIP candidates speaking at their first meetings, including Christchurch's own David Hughes.

But, because he has thwarted Noakes increasingly dwindling ambitions once more, he is now supposedly 'suppressing anti-EU activities' for money. Possibly the nastiest smear possible against a dignified individual who I know is deliberately choosing not to rise to it and descend to the level of the gutter.

I, on the other hand, dont mind getting a bit dirty and showing David Noakes up for what he is - a disgruntled swivel-eyed loon who UKIP is far, far better off without.

Out The Mouths Of Babes (And French Lawyers)

2007-03-21T12:39:00.000Z

Once his sentence is served, Hadfi will be deported and barred from ever returning to France.

His lawyer Jean-Pierre Cabanes meanwhile insisted there were extenuating circumstances.

"This is the result of a marriage that was arranged, not chosen," he said, pointing to the gulf separating his client, who came from southern Morocco, and his young wife, who had grown up in France.

Well that pretty much covers it doesnt it. An Islamic immigrant who ripped out his wife's eyes because she wouldnt have sex with him was prone to do such a thing because of the 'gulf' between his culture and that of the West. Pretty good case for not allowing people from countries on the other side of that particular gulf anywhere near a civilised society really...

(Hat Tip to Dumbjon)

Open 'Who Should You Vote For' Thread

2007-03-16T10:19:00.000Z

Its that time again, we have local Elections coming up soon. UKIP locally will be standing some very strong candidates and I know they have high hopes, having finally learned to place local issues in their leaflets and having gotten a phenomenal 12% response rate and taken their membership to the level of one of the strongest branches in the country, ironically even higher than during UKIP's national peak after the 2004 European Elections. There may even be some BNP candidates turning up in Christchurch, I will enquire...there are certainly going to be some in neighbouring Bournemouth, where both parties will likely stand a strong swathe of candidates.

So here's an open thread for everybody to jump all over. Tell us who we should vote for whether or not there is a candidate standing locally, and why we should vote for them. I await your comments with interest.

Must Go And See That

2007-03-15T18:11:00.000Z

Via the ever-helpful House of Dumb, Small Dead Animals brings us a list of the movies Hollywood should have made instead of the nasty pro-freedom, anti-Islamic (Persians of a few hundred years before Islam apparently being honorary Muslims) '300'.

Including such gems as this, my personal favourite:

"Indiana Jones & IN THE NAME OF ALLAH WE SHALL AVENGE THE LAST CRUSADE. Peace be upon you."

Bwahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Spirit of Nazism, Alive and Well

2007-03-14T14:01:00.000Z

Please read this story, about a homeschooled child who has been forcibly committed to a mental insitution in Germany, then go to the website set up to call for a boycott of all German goods until she is returned unconditionally to her family.

Thanks.

DSD

You Just Keep Doing It To Yourselves

2007-03-14T08:36:00.000Z

I upset a few people a while ago when I explained why I wouldnt vote BNP. See, I respect this guy. Often disagree with him, but he doesnt use offensive language, and genuinely believes that his BNP support is correct and I know from correspondence that he is not a racist in the 'whites are better than everyone else' sense. Simple, clear statements like this cant really be argued with...

But then we have other 'BNP Bloggers' like this. The first post is a good one about the political corruption of the media, albeit couched in fairly blunt terms. The second is about the whining of Black PC PCs about a white PC being awarded compensation for being smeared over the the investigation into the Muslim Inspector who sent his mistress death threats by text message, amongst other things, and is now national news because he was one of seven applicants rejected for a job that - the horror! - a white officer got.

The third is a curious verbatim reprint of a report which seems at first to say that ASLEF couldnt expel a BNP member but when you get to the end actualy seems to uphold that they could? A weird one, methinks that the original source (the Times) has got somewhat confused? Or is just me?

See, it goes on and all looks OK. Cameron/Mercer, the repeating of the stats about the rising and totally disproportionate incidence of Islamic rapes in Scandinavian cities, all in all not all that different from my own Blog in some ways. It seems that what we have here is just another white guy who's had enough of the hypocrisy of racist Black and Muslims organisations and the Government in treating whites as inferiors and then calling them racist.

And then I got to this post, which was responded to by 'Serendib' who seems to be a member/advocate of one of those Black organisations. And the guy's true colours (if you'll excuse the pun) suddenly come out...

The title pretty much covers it I suppose - 'A Black Trying To Ape Intelligence, LOL'.

Charming. Our respectable BNP Blogger then informs Serendib that:

"The only Anti-Fascist organisation I know of is the BNP, unless you include the NF and Combat 18 (the latter will probably be tracing your whereabouts via the IP address every visitor to this blog leaves on my site meter, which is 86.142.164 and places you in Salcott, Norfolk".

Riiiiiight. So the National Front and Combat 18 are 'anti-fascists'. And our respectable BNP Blogger thinks its cool to boast about being in cahoots with Combat 18, the inept but still extremely nasty wannabe paramilitary Nazi group who skulk around Britain's Nazi Skinhead music scene.

Serendib tongue-in-cheek offers to help our BNP man compile his list of racist Black organisations by telling him that there is a list as long as his collective arms. Our BNP man informs him that he should realise that 'monkeys have longer arms than humans' and that if he doesnt understand the purpose of compiling a list of such organisations he should get a white friend to read them to him.

So, Combat 18 is cool. Blacks are monkeys. Blacks cant read. There's more, but you get the point. He's even popped over here and then strutted about his site's higher hit count which did make me grin.

Yeah maybe asking him to find a black friend to read the posts to him where it shows I took a long Blogging break and therefore am only just back up and running was a bit mean, but hey, a big tough guy with friends in C18 ought to be able to take it on the chin...

Hey Buddy, Can You Spare Me A Parallel?

2007-03-12T17:40:00.000Z

Via the Wide Awakes, what may well be a very familiar sounding tale to those of us who grew up with Derek Hatton and the infamous Militant Tendency in the 80's. For me the antics of the 'Loony Left' Labour local Councils and their 'nuclear free zones', councillors ranting about US smart bombs which were programmed only to target black people and complete inability to spend money on anything vaguely resembling essential services, were my first introduction to the true insanity of distilled Leftism, or Moonbattery as it is known in modern parlance.

Seems out in the good old US of A the Dems are having similar issues...

"The following account is most likely playing out across the country – especially in small rural communities. My source has asked me to keep silent until after the elections are over. Tomorrow I will reveal more of this story. But for now, suffice it to say that activists Democrats are quietly taking over the party and silently eliminating duly elected local party chairs by very unscrupulous and possibly illegal means."

Its called Entryism. The British Left is fantastic at it. Hell, they dont just restrict it to local parties, they have used it to infiltrate just about every TV newsroom in Britain...

"In comes a new party volunteer that offers to help get the local party online with a new web site. The local party is delighted. Donations come in, money is spent finding a good web site developer, and the local party web site goes online.

The helpful new volunteer offers to act as web administrator. The country chair is delighted. But little by little, the new web administrator takes more and more liberties and begins to publish “news articles” that are filled with questionable inflammatory opinions. The party chair asks the new volunteer to cease these activities. But the new volunteer refuses. Then the party chair is forced to remove the new volunteer as web administrator."

Its Militant all over again, updated for the Internet age...go read the whole thing, and if like me you remember well this stuff happening in the UK twenty years ago it will send a shiver down your spine...

Teethcutting

2007-03-11T19:00:00.000Z

Yes, Amiee and Amber have had their first Dungeons and Dragons session playing together. On the same side, full roleplaying mode with character sheets (after a short tutorial on how to use Daddy's beginner-friendly customised character sheets) and me as the DM.

We stole the same three characters Amiee and I use for her own solo game - a cleric of Talos, a Sorceror with a penchant for messy pyrotechnics and of course the legendary Murgh the Minotaur, a very large and aggressive chappie who Amber took over as her character.

I placed them in Amn in the Forgotten Realms, looking to hire on to fight the Ogre Mage-led army which has taken over the south of the country. Having got into possibly the shortest bar fight ever (a Half-Orc who hates Minotaurs mouthed off and the Sorceror cast a 100% successful Disintegrate spell) they came to the attention of the Shadow Thieves who control much of the cities of Amn and somewhat undiplomatically told them to come back in the morning to negotiate as they wanted their kip. Amber's Minotaur hears the noise of someone trying to unpick the door lock, opens the door to the great surprise of the troupe of black-clad thieves who scramble desperately back into the shadows and declares:

'We's tryin to get some sleep. Come back in da mornin or I'll kill yer."

No troubles, no messing around, the kid was seriously focussed. An excellent start to proper home DnD that doesnt involve cuddly toys...

Liking Her Already

2007-03-10T17:42:00.000Z

A new writer at A Tangled Web. She has got Frank 'Im not a Leftist' O'Dwyer already champing at the bit because she dared to describe herself as a conservative in the comments to her first post. Definitely going to be worth a read in the future...

Such A Shame Nobody Was Listening

2007-03-09T10:10:00.000Z

"Iraq presents far from ideal conditions for achieving strategic goals. Saddam Hussein is the culmination of a violent political culture that is rooted in a tortured history. Ethnic, tribal, and religious schisms could produce civil war or fracture the state after Saddam is deposed.

Should an unwelcome occupation continue for a prolonged time, a force initially viewed as liberators can rapidly be relegated to the status of invaders. To reduce the amount of resentment about the occupation in Iraq and the surrounding region, it is essential that military forces hand over responsibilities to civilian agencies as soon as practicable.

If the Iraq war were to progress rapidly with few civilian casualties, the occupation would probably be characterized by an initial honeymoon period, during which the United States will reap the benefits of ridding the population of a brutal dictator. Nevertheless, most Iraqis and most other Arabs will probably assume that the United States intervened in Iraq for its own reasons and not to liberate the population. Long-term gratitude is unlikely, and suspicion of U.S. motives will increase as the occupation continues."

Doctor Andrew Terrill and Doctor Conrad C. Crane, what a shame it was that nobody was listening when you wrote those words.

In February 2003.

One To File Under 'Vested Interests'...

2007-03-07T15:36:00.000Z

A former ACLU (that's the American Civil Liberties Union for the uninitiated) State Chapter head has been arrested on what seems like pretty solid Child Porn charges. Charles Rust-Tierney has, in the past, argued for amongst other things, unlimited access to the Internet in public libraries because “recognizing that individuals will continue to behave responsibly and appropriately while in the library, the default should be maximum, unrestricted access to the valuable resources of the Internet.”

Uh huh.

The ACLU has in the past been in what would, for any organisation not on the Left and therefore MSM protected, an unenviable position. Namely that of arguing the case that in the name of Civil Liberties whilst Child Porn should of course be regarded as beyond the pale and illegal, distributing it shouldnt be because, well, Civil Liberties demand freedom of 'information' and all that jazz.

As legislative counsel for the ACLU in 1985, Barry Lynn told the U.S. Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography (of which Focus on the Family President Dr. James C. Dobson was a member) that child pornography was protected by the First Amendment. While production of child porn could be prevented by law, he argued, its distribution could not be. A few years later (1988), Lynn told the Senate Judiciary Committee that even requiring porn producers to maintain records of their performers’ ages was impermissible.
“If there is no federal record-keeping requirement for the people portrayed in Road and Track or Star Wars,” he said, “there can be no such requirement for Hustler or Debbie Does Dallas.

Oh dear oh dear oh dear.

The Anti-Capitalists Defend Indefensible Capitalism

2007-03-07T09:54:00.000Z

Seriously. If there ever was a true case of capitalism gone wild and intruding where it really shouldnt, its the grotesque and bizarre practice of 'buying carbon credits' instead of, you know, not producing the carbon emissions in the first place. But, it seems, the Lefties at Tangled Web are all for this particular brand of capitalism, you know, under certain circumstances.

No prizes for guessing which circumstances folks...

"Brothers, sisters and politicians! If, perchance, you were left feeling slightly (or even mightily) perturbed, vexed and distempered by the revelations that The Prophet Al Gore's personal gas and 'leccy bills are just a tad on the heavy side, quite out of step with his great and holy prophetic utterances of immutable Truth (All repeat: "Truth!") about our impending doom... (All repeat: "Doom!") and if, as a result of your disquiet in the light of these exceedingly sour and bilious revelations, you sought to reassure yourself that said revelations were in fact untrue, or exaggerated, or indeed (whisper!) the work of Xoxxogoth (that damnable agent of slander, libel, defamation and heresy, father of all deniers of global warming Truth (All repeat: "Truth!") and bringer of foul-odoured gastric indisposition at the most embarrassing of moments)....then Lo! Fear not, but cease thy procrastinations at once, O faithful one, and be thou refreshéd* and calméd!* Remember no more, neither call unto thy mind in any wise, how these revelations caused you at first to stumble in The Faith (All repeat: "The Faith!") but let thy trust in the great Prophet Gore be once more restored unto completion!"

I think Tom Tyler's been watching too many evengalical videos myself...though there's definitely a bit of Lovecraftian style in there too...good man.

Le Francais Go Into Total Free Speech Lockdown

2007-03-06T22:47:00.000Z

No, I'm really not exaggerating. As is pointed out by French Civil Rights group Obedi (note to Liberal readers, this is not a proper Civil Rights group, being concerned with such fascistic causes as Freedom of Speech as opposed to stopping Muslims being upset by cartoons by banning it), the sentence for reporting on, say, rioting Islamists will undoubtedly be higher than any sentence the Islamists will get.

You know, like the time Bloggers used footage of rioting Muslims to expose the fact that 'Sarkozy, Sale Juif' doesnt actually mean 'Sarkozy Go Home'...

Bad Girl

2007-03-06T22:28:00.000Z

Amber has caused some friction whilst in Yorkshire with Mrs Right-Wing Zionist Conspirator, it seems. It seems she needs a lesson in the difference between debating issues and calling Blair and Cameron the ten-year old equivalent of nasty twats...I'm actually mildly annoyed because I know she can when she wants to. Just calling nasty twats nasty twats isnt good enough and she knows that. A kid who can accurately tell people what the European Arrest Warrant actually is can do better and will get the respect she is looking for in terms of her political knowledge much more readily if she does the issues thing.

Still, seeing as they were in Huddersfield at the time, at least it wasn't any worse...she might have mentioned the I-word, after all.

An Interesting Perspective...

2007-03-06T15:02:00.000Z

...on Israel's troubles.

"Arabs are a hot crowd. They will riot about excavations on the Temple Mount, Separation Barrier, antiterrorist operations. Arabs will catch on the American Blacks’ strategy, and demand perks and super-equality. Israeli Arabs will dictate their will to the Jews, trample on Jewish institutions, demand personal and municipal subsidies, infrastructure projects in their villages. Arabs used to be Israeli untouchables. They would remain untouchables, but now because the Jews are afraid to touch them. Political correctness of Jews is the ultimate Arab weapon."

Samson Blinded is a 'Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict'. The conclusions the author draws are not always those I would agree with, but his Machiavellian perspective certainly does give an extremely welcome fresh take on the manner in which the cowardice and realpolitik of Israel's leaders rather than the anti-Semitism of the world's media or even the hostile intent of the Arabs may be what is ultimately responsible for its demise.

On The Darker Side

2007-03-06T14:07:00.000Z

Via that man Laban Tall...

The Campus Crusade For Cthulhu.

Oh dearie dearie me...

I have always been a big Lovecraft fan. In fact, I just ran a Live Action Roleplaying Game entitled Area 52 with a Call of Cthulhu theme, though the poor players didnt know it was a Cthulhu theme 'until it was too late', as they say. The expression on the face of the team's Cryptographer (who was cast as a Cryptographer because he used to be one for the Norwegian Army and yes, he came all the way to the sunny South Coast of England for a Roleplaying convention, the mad fool) when he finally put it all together was quite a picture...

For this grand event Mrs Right-Wing Zionist Conspirator made a huge cardboard sarcophagus which she then discreetly climbed into halfway through (right after the massed hippie Alien Rights protesters gatecrashed the party), in full costume. See this picture, and ask yourselves if you could stay absolutely stil and quite inside that thing for two hours in costume including a papier-mached crash helmet...

Returning To Blogging

2007-03-06T13:11:00.000Z

I'm not sure about this. Not at all. It may be that lack of time will kick me in the teeth once again, though my Childcare NVQ is now finished and I wont be restarting till September. However this must be offset by the Homeschooling factor...

Yes, I've decided to tentatively return to Blogging. I am intending to branch things out from Politics to the whole intense experience of Homeschooling and even the roleplaying games that I like so well, though I suspect Politics will remain the man focus as always.

Why come back? Well things like Tangled Web's Talkradio show, a very ambitious venture indeed, have excited my interest in Online debate again (perhaps just because I like the sound of my own voice so much as I am sure some will suggest :). Also for reasons best known to myself I am finding both Republican and Democrat primaries in the US quite fascinating, and even bought this little gem recently.

With this in mind as most of my (former and hopefully soon returning) readers are British, I will be trying to install the Pajamas Media weekly poll widget thingy on here as well.

Me, I'd be voting for Tom Tancredo, Colorado's 'Immigration Senator'. He isnt seen as one of the four Republican frontrunners (three if you dont count the artful Newt Gingrich, who says that if he does decide to run he isnt going to start campaigning so early anyway and is consistently running second to Rudy Guiliani amongst polls of Republican voters).

I guess many people have 'make or break' issues, issues which would stop them supporting any candidate or Party if they didnt agree on those issues. For me of course domestically that issue is remaining in the European Union, and therefore I would never ever vote or campaign for a Party or candidate which advocated remaining in the EU. If, however, I lived in the United States my primary issue would be that of immigration and specifically of course illegal immigration, which means that I would never vote for McCain because of his sponsorship of what is effectively an amnesty and reward program for illegal immigrants, or for Giuliani who supports it.

I hope Gingrich steps up if Tancredo's campaing doesnt develop, but thats maybe a story for another post...

Incidentally, a part of her Literacy exercises I will be gently encouraging my little person to post on her own Blog in one form or another, to improve her typing for ICT as well if nothing else. And when I get time I will be setting up my father with his own Blog (and yes, Dangerously Subversive Grandad currently heads the Opinion Polls for the best name :), so things may well truly be a family affair from now on...

Permanent Mothballs

2007-01-16T21:21:00.000Z

Dear few remaining loyal readers,

I expect you have pretty much given up on seeing more posts on this Blog, and I must apologise for the lack of explanation as to my absence. Basically events in my persona life have conspired to prevent me having the time to devote to doing this Blog justice, especially when there are so many other Bloggers doing a standup job of promoting the kind of message I also like to send.

As of today, my daughter is being indefinitely homeschooled. This on top of my own work/study/charity/occasional political/other commitments means that the DSD Blog is pretty much at an end for the foreseeable future. Rest assured I am still around in the Blogosphere and may even take up the very kind offers of 'occasional guest writer' I have had from other sites, but I simply do not have the time to keep this Blog running in anything resembling a proper way.

I will be back sometime, but for now, ta ta and see you all around...

Ten Things I Would Never Do

2006-12-05T20:21:00.000Z

Yeah I know this one's been floating around the Britblogs for a while, but a few people have tagged me to do mine, so just for the hell of it, here goes, seeing as Amiee is in bed with a crashing headache, I am not in the mood to start the last big Unit of my Childcare NVQ tonight and I'm reasonably up to date on my emails.

1. Vote for any Party which advocates Britain remaining in the EU.

2. Vote for any Party which advocates net Immigration into Britain.

3. Allow anyone I see wearing of those charming Hamas bandanas or a Hezbollah T-Shirt to be able to walk away from the moment with their teeth remaining.

4. Stand for Prime Minister (for my family's sake).

5. Let my daughter's first boyfriend escape our first meeting with his underwear unsoiled.

6. Trust my ex-wife.

7. Not listen to music for 24 hours solid.

8. Allow anyone to seriously use the phrase 'Good Conservative Eurosceptic' in conversation or especially during the Q & A section of a Public Meeting without throwing something at them.

9. Not be there for a mate who really needed me.

10. Stop Fighting Back. And before you ask the obvious, I refer you to James Dean...

Fulfilling All The Cliches

2006-12-03T19:49:00.000Z

Once upon a time the cliche of the totally out of touch Tory was a byword in British politics. It used to be that the patrician Conservative with his and hers matching four by fours and three kids named Tarquin, Rosamund and Arabella was accused (with justification or not) of not having the faintest clue how the man on the street lived.

Some things really never change. Whilst Tarquin, Rosamund and Arabella are now generally just as likely to be scions of Labour and Lib-Dem great houses as Conservative ones, there is still something really special about the sheer ignorance about daily life shown by the smug, grinning new crop of Blu-Labour Cameronites. 'Special' like bowel surgery is special.

Ladies and gentlemen, without further ado I give you Iain Dale, proving that Blu-Labour's rising stars (and deeply informed and clever pundits, let us not forget - after all our Iain has his own TV Show on politics and everything) are capable of being every bit as ignorant of real life as their Party ancestors, but with a special Cameron twist. Yes, the cliche has now extended itself to a truly global scale.

"Shout Out Liverpool alerts me to the Iraqi Roulette blog, which details every day life in downtown Baghdad. Horrifying reading. Is it really this bad?"

Oh. My. God.

Beirut, Best Place In The World You Know

2006-12-02T19:34:00.000Z

Apparently women in Beirut know 'how to present themselves properly' and not look like 'ladies of the evening' in their 501's. They certainly arent perpetuating racist stereotypes of black men by posting their pictures on the Internet after being sexually assaulted by them. Presumably they also dont get assaulted by scum like the one Jackie Danicki describes, being too busy dodging crowds of Hezbollah supporters (what exactly did that scumbag Siniora expect after spending the entire Israel-Lebanon conflict praising Hezbollah and calling them heroic martrys?) and pieces of Cabinet Minister.

Some of the comments on the poor woman's post make you want to weep, they really do.

The Answer To The Question

2006-11-28T21:57:00.000Z

Well, the future Mrs Right-Wing Zionist Conspirator never did manage to ask Nigel Farage the burning question on account of finishing work late. But he fielded some really tough ones rather well, including the one about 'What do you think should be done about British troops in Iraq?'.

The answer was one of quite astonishingly commonsense pragmatism. He doesnt believe that British troops have been given the equipment to do the job of 'counter-insurgency', let alone fight the war that we should be fighting. He also doesnt believe that any British interests either were served or are being served by British troops being in Iraq. He pointed out that not only was Saddam Hussein not truly a real threat to Britain, WMD or not, but that by creating a 'meeting engagement' situation in Iraq we have allowed Syria and Iran, the actual true threats (regimes of madmen as he referred to them) to become the focal points and logistic powerbrokers for Islamic power in the region.

And, most tellingly of all, this 'little Englander' has a strong enough grasp of foreign affairs that he understands that, no matter how distasteful the idea may be, the truth is that the only end to the murderous internecine hatred between Sunni and Shia (with both trying to off as many Kurds as possible on the way to killing each other) is a three-state solution.

And he's right of course.

He identified immigration as the absolute key issue that concerns the British public today. A year ago you'd have been hard put to find a single UKIP official to admit that there was any issue at all facing Britain today that wasnt the EU itself. He wants - shockingly - actual proper work permits to be issued instead of National Insurance numbers for everyone who gets off the boat or plane, EU nationals or not. The fascist! Or something.

In short, I was very impressed. The man's shorter than I realised as well, he actually had to look up at me when pumping my hand and asking me to stand at the Locals next year...I didnt have the heart to tell him I havent been a member for about fourteen months.

Mrs RWZC will endeavour to ask the question next time he's available, of that I have no doubt. Until then, I have to give a definite thumbs up to UKIP's new supremo - if the party's next big policy initiative on Law and Order is as excellent as their Flat Tax proposals and Education paper then I have to predict one new UKIP member and one renewed one for early next year.

Interesting New Blog & A Meeting of the Minds

2006-11-20T10:51:00.000Z

...by the name of Coming Out From Under. The chappie/lady is a Lib Dem who seems to have suddenly woken up to the fact that he is surrounded by people in his Party who are neither Liberal nor Democratic. I would suggest he plumps for UKIP but I'm not totally sure on that one myself - I am due to meet Nigel Farage this Friday night myself and am waiting to see if he impresses as much in person and seems truly sincere in his 'broad base agenda' and if he is, I am intending to rejoin once I finish my Childcare NVQ in February.

Which leads onto the next part of this post. Friday's meeting will also be a first of sorts. Why? Because the future Mrs Right-Wing Zionist Conspirator is coming with the same purpose as I am, that's why.

Now, I've met Knapman. I was in fact at his first public meeting after he took the leadership and was one of the first to shake his hand and wish him well. A very likeable, charming but also somewhat out of his depth, cautious and ineffectual person. In short, a great asset to the Party but NOT as a leader to push a radical agenda. Though why UKIP's raft of Policies should be seen as 'radical' is beyond me - it is, as it is being called, the Commonsense Agenda.

Farage, now. Well he's a great, nay fantastic speaker, in fact it was his speech at a packed 250-strong meeting several years ago in Christchurch which convinced me to join UKIP and help start a Constituency Association. However he was previously very much part of the 'Dont mention anything but the EU' wing of UKIP which always put me off the man somewhat as I am very firmly NOT of that wing, and indeed think that UKIP should be so much more than the Party that 'gets us out'.

Farage is now a reformed character, it seems. He is consistent with his message of a broadbased, basically Rightwing agenda - and by Rightwing I mean conservative with a small c - small government, respect for Civil Liberties, but also actually acknowledging the concept of Prison as a Punishment and Deterrent rather than an evil, reforming Education by removing bureaucracy completely and also wiping away the stain of social engineering and politicisation from our schools and teacher training colleges. In short, common sense.

But there is of course the Elephant In The Room. The Elephant which is the reason Mrs RWZC is coming to meet Farage, and the question she is going to ask him - and is also the reason I left UKIP in disgust last year when the Party failed to issue a single statement about or even mention on its website the appalling events of the 7th July 2005.

"What would UKIP do about Islam if elected, Mr Farage?"

I will most definitely be posting his answer over the weekend.

Scum Of A Feather...

2006-11-19T09:59:00.000Z

...flocking together.

I rather liked Murray's reaction to the David Irving case, back when he was still part of Silent Running, a Blog which is really not the same without him, seeming at times now to consist almost entirely of one member's travellogues.

Commenters:

"Well of course he is a Holocaust-denying Nazi wanker, BUT there should be such a thing as Freedom of Speech etc etc and yes maybe he was a bit dumb to go back to Austria when he knew full well there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest but still, what about that Freedom of Speech eh?"

Murray:

"Yeah, but it's David Irving. Can't really make myself care."

Commenters:

"No, but Murray, this is a very serious question of Freedom of Speech isnt it?"

Murray:

"Yeah, but it's David Irving."

Commenters:

"But, but, Freedom of Speech?"

Murray:

"Yeah but also, it's David Irving."

Priceless...frankly whatever your opinions on Irving (and mine not surprisingly are fairly unprintable) the guy deserves jail for the sheer stupidity of publicly and loudly going back into a country which has an outstanding warrant on him. It's a bit like going down a West Bank High Street wearing nothing but an Israeli flag and a pink tutu propositioning every strapping young male terror-lover you see. That kind of stupidity just invites retribution on a Darwinian level.

And besides, like Murray says - it's David Irving...

The Mighty One Returns...

2006-11-17T19:21:00.000Z

...and he is Exasperated. Worlds tremble, empires crumble. At least they should, because as always this guy is so totally, utterly in tune with the reality of the world that I have to pinch myself every time he writes just to make sure he didnt lift the thoughts right out of my head.

One day he'll actually write something I disagree with, but I doubt very much that day is coming soon.

If You Have Any Faith In The Integrity Of Al-Beeb...

2006-11-16T13:38:00.000Z

...go here and read the entire comment thread, full of literally scores of Police anecdotes about what happens when you bring Peelers into contact with Auntie's so-called 'journalists'.

And literally not one of those anecdotes has anything positive to say.

Sublime

2006-11-10T09:47:00.000Z

From the ever-wonderful Cox and Forkum. The European Union, of course, says this verdict is 'barbaric'. But the Saddam Hussein regime torturing and murdering hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of its own citizens wasnt 'barbaric'. It just wasnt worth, you know, mentioning.

Ever.

Top Republican Fundraiser Says It All

2006-11-09T10:35:00.000Z

Richard A. Vigurie nails it pretty damn well.

"Congressional Republicans should quickly disassociate themselves from the failed big government policies of President Bush and set a conservative course. The White House has failed them, initiating policies that the voters have now soundly repudiated. Congressional Republicans should always remember who elected them — the conservative and independent voters back home, not the elitist (and lame duck) power brokers in the White House, on K Street, and at the Republican National Committee," he went on to say.

"At the same time, grass-roots conservatives must no longer act as an appendage of the Republican Party. We should concentrate instead on becoming a Third Force in American politics that forces both parties to the Right and sets the nation's agenda."

I wonder if Britain's 'Good Conservatives' are listening?

You Absolute, Utter Fucking Bastards. I Hope Every One Of You Dies Slowly, Starting Today

2006-11-06T21:12:00.000Z

Murdering newborn babies is 'widening the management option.'

There are simply no words for how casually and callously evil these people are. None at all.

Women and Gays, Know Your Place! But Its OK, They're Cool With It...

2006-11-04T17:48:00.000Z

Well, that didnt take long, did it? The voices in the Muslim community very fearfully raised in opposition to Sheikh 'Stay In The Bedroom Or You Deserve To Be Raped' Hilali's comments that women 'deserve it' have gone from actual, you know, mild condemnation, to...

The Muslim Women's Association, which first admitted to being "shocked" by Hilaly's sermon, now said he was "very good to all Muslim women". Said founding president Aziz El Saddik: "Those who say bad things about him, they have very bad manners."

This is Cholmondley-Warner territory here, 'pieces of uncovered meat' and gentlemen. If Cholmondley-Warner beat his wife and filipino maidservant to keep them in line, thought gang-rape rather than social ostracisation was the best method of keeping women in the bedroom and wore a beard instead of a dinner jacket, anyway.

As Andrew Bolt points out in his excellent article about the way 5000 adoring Muslims greeted the Sheikh after his faked episode 'like a rock star', it is clear that this is no 'tiny minority of extremists' moment. 5000 Australian Muslims do not turn out to greet a man who has said women who step outside of the bedroom without a hijab invite gang rape because of US foreign policy in Iraq. They do it because grotesque, misogynistic savages like Al-Hilali have their support because they agree with his views. No other reason.

Dumbjon also points out the appalling silence of the British Left on this issue. As he says, there were moonbat screams from the rooftop when UKIP's wittiest raconteur Godfrey Bloom made his famous 'cleaning behind the fridge' joke (which did give your writer the chance to make the UKIP Conference giggle by yelling out "He's finishing off behind the fridge" when he was late on stage for his speech that year) it was as if someone had threatened to boil their favourite puppies alive.

But now...now there is as usual a deafening silence when its someone on the darker side of pale saying something which on a relative scale would in any sane moral universe cause approximately 100,000,000 times the outrage. In fact for that matter the Gay Rights lobby has been curiously restrained after something similar in recent weeks over here as well...

"He told me that in a true Islamic state, such punishments were part of Islam: if the person had had a trial, at which four witnesses testified that they had seen the actual homosexual acts. It is part of the central tenets of Islam: that sex outside marriage is forbidden; this is stated in the Koran and the prophet Mohammed had stated that these punishments were due to such behaviours,'" the Imam is alleged to have told Dr Casson.

The punishment in question being execution. Now in a country where Christians are put inside a cell for handing out leaflets saying they think homosexuality is, you know, a bit wrong, you'd think the Gay Rights Brigade would feel bold enough to call for some kind of action on the part of the authorities?

Nah.

Peter Tatchell, of gay rights group OutRage!, said he was disturbed that British Islamic clergy would endorse the executions of gay and lesbian Muslims:"Muslim and gay people know the pain of prejudice and discrimination. We should be working together to challenge homophobia and Islamophobia. I hope liberal Muslims will speak out in defence of the human rights of lesbians and gay men," he said.

Good God. This guy says that Tatchell and everyone like him should be in the ground, and the best he can manage is 'disturbed'. Whilst reaching out to confirm his ongoing support for the religion which thinks he should be dead. Unbelievable.

Looks like where Islam is concerned, women and gays really do know their place. Mr. Cholmondley-Warner would be so proud...

Britain 2006 - He Who Mugs The Piper Calls The Tune

2006-11-04T15:06:00.000Z

The response to explaining to the teacher (who the day before had a ten-year old throw his schoolbag at her and hurl abuse after her in front of his classmates and just walked away) that the same ten-year old has been making threats against my daughter and also explaining to er how his father (who is actually a drug-dealing scumbag of a step-father) is going to come and beat me up.

"Well I'm afraid the Government is dragging its feet on giving us the funds so we can give him the support he needs."

The support he needs. That's Britain 2006.

In conversation with a 'small businesswoman' of my acquaintance this morning:

"Well you know I'm from Milton Keynes. When my kids were at school we had a huge problem with gypsies. Every so often there'd be a huge influx, they were violent, wrecked wherever they parked their caravans, and then there kids would come into the school, they were so badly-behaved, violent as well. And the school would find the funds and draft in extra staff to teach those kids for a few months and our kids' education would suffer accordingly."

Now thats about three-four years ago. Anyone think Milton Keynes isnt still laying out the welcome mat for those colourful gypsy folk with their colourful habit of turning pleasant green land into rubbish-choked wasteland? They come to Kings Park in Boscombe every year now, because Dorset County Council laid out the welcome mat a few years back and explained how it wanted to spend our money on 'reaching out' to these kings of the road. So now every year the community wearily awaits the few weeks when most of the park becomes a no-go area, when the grass which has just recovered from the previous year's depredations will be blackened and churned into mud again, when bouncers outside Bournemouth's clubs try to make sure they are on duty in another county in case the charming gypsy chappies start another round of drive-by shootings directed at the staff of whichever club they were turned away from the night before.

All at our expense. That's Britain 2006. Whoever makes the most noise and the most mess gets the resources.

When will the rest of us learn to start breaking things and shouting? It's the only form of communication that this or any future Government seems to understand.

You've Just Got To Be Kidding

2006-11-02T17:47:00.000Z

How to lose 141,000 people.

Just dont bother keeping track of them. Its not like we have ANY control over their entry into our island nation whilst we are part of the EU anyway.

The net in-migration figure for the eight former Communist states was 64,000. However, these figures did not appear to tally with previous Home Office data on arrivals from the eight eastern European states, which said 205,000 came here to work in 2005.

Fantastic. So the Home Office (which actually one would assume has some idea of how many are actually coming in when they first arrive) have lost track of more than 70% of Eastern European immigrants from 2005 between them entering Britain and trying to actually record them properly. Great stuff. So if we follow the same mathematical model for all immigration, it follows that this statement...

It means the country's net population rose by 500 a day, or 185,000 during the 12 months.

...should actually read...

It means the country's net population rose by 1600 a day, or almost 600,000 during the 12 months.

That's another London in ten-twelve years. Oh goody. See, we could theoretically stop the majority immigration from outside the EU, but not from inside it. We have no choice to accept the endless flood of migrants from places like Poland (which ironically has lost so many people to Britain that it is now asking nicely 'can we have our people back please' like a kid asking for its ball back) while we remain inside the EU.

So, to our lovable political class, thanks for keeping us in the EU. Thanks to the Tories who took us in and lied through their teeth to keep us in. Thanks to Labour which abandoned its principles and did a 180-degree turn when offered a bribe in the form of the Social Chapter. And of course thanks to the Lib Dims who are firm believers in the idea that they know what;s best for us and just because we will never elect them is no reason why they shouldnt use the vehicle of the EU to inflict their Socialist insanities on us.

Well, I say 'thanks'. What I really mean is...well, I'll leave that to my readers' fertile little imaginations.

The Naked Jew-Hatred Of Al-Beeb

2006-10-30T12:11:00.000Z

Here's the plot, right?

Islamic Terrorists storm into an Embassy, hold the people inside it hostage, including the same incompetent bunch of MI5 agents who always seem to have managed to get themselves held hostage - this was happening both the last two times I accidentally tuned into the pile of monumental shite that is Spooks. The Terrorists then start shooting hostages one by one until their demands are met (seems unclear what they actually were) until, yes, they are dramatically revealed as...JEWS!

Yes folks, its Mossad in disguise, taking hostages and committing murder for no apparent reason whilst pretending to be Al-Qaeda...led from behind the scenes by their sinister fat, balding, and therefore obviously Jewish handler. He even mouths 'Shalom' apparently, just so there's no confusion.

Is this an isolated incident on this particular freakshow? Nuh-uh. In Al-Beeb's world London it seems is positively teeming with incompetent Jewish assassins and shadowy traitors willing to do the evil Mossad's bidding, duped nonetheless by equally evil Christian fundamentalists, who as well all know have a well-developed intelligence network and terror capabilities capable (apparently) of fooling even possibly the shrewdest intelligence service in the world.

As Eric explains:

"The really bad guys in last night's episode manage to trick the Mossad into thinking that the show's hero, an MI5 agent, is some kind of anti-Semite (obviously grounds for instant assassination - Ken Livingstone watch out! -DSD) , so the Mossad sends in a crack assassination team of around six men armed with easily-identifiable Israeli pistols. ("Ooo! Jerichos - they must be Israelis!" declares one of the crack MI5 team.)

Fortunately, the tall blonde heroine this season (who in the previous episode snarls out the phrase 'Yemenite Jew') - (subtle and tasty stuff from Al-Beeb there, I wonder if any of the characters has ever snarled 'Pali Muslim' with such venom - DSD) uses her martial arts skills to disarm most of them, while unarmed hero Adam deals with the rest. The one surviving member of this "elite" unite of bumbling Jewish terrorists is called off following a phone call made by MI5 boss Harry to his Israeli counterpart, the cultural attache at the Israeli embassy. Harry threatens to have all the Mossad agents in London deported if they don't stop shooting at MI5 officers right now. And no, I'm not making this up.

I wish he was. But of course this is where fiction runs too now - no 'serious' political dramatist would ever dare reflect the real world where Islamic Terrorists actually do murder hostages, do storm embassies and arent either Jews in disguise or manipulated by them (or the Christian Fundamentalists, well known as they are for their subtlety and craft in such matters).

Nah, much easier just to script another thrilling episode of 'blame the Jews'.

What A Happy Anniversary. Look, They Made Bonfires And Everything

2006-10-29T17:50:00.000Z

Has it really been a whole year already?

Blimey. Yes it has. Seems like just yesterday...though of course for the RoP every day is fire and destruction day. Isn't it?

Still, its not like our good ol boys of the European RoP, never meanin no harm, havent been keeping their hand in in the meantime and falling behind their bros in the Middle East and Asia. Maybe their Parisian brethren gave those in Brussels some tips, or hey, perhaps they have a neat exchange program going! They can swap cities and learn about a whole new set of infidels to subjugate, and all about the local architecture.

And then torch it.

Out Of The Mouths Of Babes

2006-10-29T09:12:00.000Z

An interesting experiment was conducted at the very heart of our local headquarters of the Great Rightwing Zionist Conspiracy yesterday. Having had some hilarious fun with my ten-year-old and a cuddly toy Election (including a National TV Debate where Skullsplitter the Barbarian Baby Bear had to have it patiently explained to him that rushing at his opponent and decapitating him was not a valid debating technique and unlikely to win many votes except at his home polling station) she then asked to try out some election games online, which is something we have done before a few times.

This time we discovered a very enjoyable, just-complicated-enough sim called The Democracy Game. It seems to be pitched at just the right level for her. A central box shows the incumbent's popularity with different voter groups such as Poor, Motorists, Liberals, the Religious etc, who naturally enough blend into each other somewhat to a large degree, so a voter may support your Party on one issue but not on another, thus making for an interesting juggling exercise whilst also trying to run an economy! As the game says, you may well find your high-faluting principles quickly sacrificed to political or financial expediency quite swiftly...

Well, seems my little darling has some...interesting tendencies. Trying the demo, her vehement reaction to Gun Control (NO GUNS FOR ANYONE!) took me a little aback, especially when she proceeded to unconcernedly send her Liberal approval rating into freefall by authorising phone-taps, a huge expansion of the Intelligence Services, armed the Police and massively increased their funding - and incidentally wiped out British crime in a year and a half. Oh, and never had the same Terror Attack happen that occurred when I, erm, didnt.

Its interesting isnt it? At ten, despite being in a household where the mistrust of the incumbent administration's totalitarian tendencies is palpable and obvious enough that even at her tender age she must have picked up on it, she still instantly went straight towards high Statism and Authoritarianism, and sod the Liberals. I wish we had a Government that could be trusted this much...

"Daddy, what's Inheritance Tax?"

"Well its a Tax that Government levies on things that you leave to your family and friends in your will, after you die."

Stunned silence.

"That's the most STUPID thing I've ever heard! No WAY am I doing that!"

Out of the mouths of babes, eh...

A Tale Of Two Fundamentalists

2006-10-26T15:50:00.000+01:00

Yep, just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water...you can trust some senior member of the Religion of Peace to open his bearded mouth and explain how yet another group of people in the world deserve what they get, even if what they are getting from his followers is extreme violence and in this case rape and sexual assault.

While not specifically referring to the rapes, brutal attacks on four women for which a group of young Lebanese men received long jail sentences, Sheik Hilali said there were women who "sway suggestively" and wore make-up and immodest dress ... "and then you get a judge without mercy (rahma) and gives you 65 years".

The 'merciless' sentence in the Bilal Skaf case that Hilali refers to (which became a byword of what passes for Islamic humour to the Muslims of Cronulla, as in the funnies of surrounding a bikini-clad bather and commenting loudly how she 'might just be worth 55 years' in that Peaceful way we know and love) took place immediately before the renewed attacks on lifeguards that sparked the Cronulla riots in suburban Sydney, where years of gang rapes, sexual assaults, harassment and violence by 'youths of a certain ethnic origin' culminated in 5000 jackboot clad neo-Nazis apparently materialising out of thin air and chasing off their tormentors whilst chanting paeans to Hitler. Or for those of us not choosing to accept the MSM's version, the local population of all races, nationalities and creeds except that certain origin came together for once and took back the beaches their Police had given up on policing.

The senior member of the RoP speaking those words in this case is one Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali, Australia's senior 'mufti' or religious leader. Just to make sure we dont mistake his inference about immodestly dressed women for something as gentle as mild sexism, he goes for broke and makes it clear that his is the kind of misogyny most of us gave up around the 7th Century. Ah, wait, I knew there was a clue there...

"If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?

"The uncovered meat is the problem."

The sheik then said: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."

He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.

"It is said in the state of zina (adultery), the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)."

Now granted to some of his congregation may feel about as obligated to listen to him as British Protestants do to Rowan 'medals from terrorists' Williams, but none of the 500-strong congregation seems to have felt the need to dissent all that loudly. And we know, because the sermon during which he made the comments was recorded, that the usual accusations of Zionost plots and the like dont really work in this case...

Its funny though. When he does realise he is being recorded, the mufti's attitude towards women seems rather different...

Revelation of the mufti's comments comes after he criticised Mr Howard last month in The Australian for saying a minority of migrant men mistreated their women. Sheik Hilali said such a minority was found in all faiths. "Those who don't respect their women are not true Muslims."

"There's a small percentage found among all religions, but we don't recognise ours as Muslims."

Oopsy. So when the cameras are rolling, wife-beaters, gang-rapists and misogyny are beyond the pale and so their perpetrators. But when he is 'amongst friends'...let's just go over that again shall we?

He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.

Which, in the interests of balance, brings us to Fundamentalist Number 2.

I wonder if Julie Bindel will be jumping all over this story the same way she does other aspects of the crime of rape...somehow I find it in me to doubt it. From her despicable utterances in the Guardian (where else?) article that the Humble Devil uncovered (and characteristically I see he is all over this story as well) I would guess not. After all the assertion that mobile phone footage of an alleged rape victim masturbating and giving head to one of her alleged attackers is merely "evidence" as opposed to, you know, Evidence, would seem to indicate that she is not a woman prepared to believe anything as flimsy as the things people actually do and say.

"If more cases such as Shabnam's occur, we may as well forget about the criminal justice system and train groups of vigilantes to exact revenge and, hopefully, deter attacks."

Riiiiight. So here's a misogynist arguing that women who step outside of the bedroom wearing anything but full body armour are 'uncovered meat', and a misandrist arguing that gangs of Amazonian harridans should patrol the streets with torches and pitchforks searching for anyone insane enough to give them a wink.

No, no fundamentalism at all on this issue then.

UPDATE: Via an email from Daydreamer of Oz, we have Al-Beeb's reaction to this story. And sure enough, rather than being a strident condemnation of excusal of and near-incitiement to gang rape, it is instead yet another tale of Islamic victimhood.

"Australia's Muslims Fear Backlash."

You really just could not make this up.

BREAKING NEWS: The swine has stepped down after collapsing under mysterious circumstances.

He was due to meet Tom Zreika, the president of the Lebanese Muslim Association, to discuss calls for his resignation, but fell ill during talks.

Interesting wording there, no? If he hadnt met Zreika yet, who was he 'talking' with when he 'fell ill'? I don't think we've heard the last of this one yet somehow...

Just So We're Clear About Which Side I'M On

2006-10-24T17:56:00.000+01:00

This is extremely painful viewing, I warn you now. Despite my usual loathing of people such as the woman in this video who have suddenly woken up to the wrongness of their actions, even my stony heart was somewhat moved by her obvious guilt and shame.

Possibly the worst part is the group of Pali kids sitting with the toy guns boasting of their desire to kill Jews. Palestinian child abuse, nothing less.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is simply wrong.

New Thread For 'Why I Wont Vote BNP'

2006-10-24T12:11:00.000+01:00

Slightly odd step I know, but the previous thread on this has ended up sprawling to the point where I and I suspect other people are getting a bit lost on it. So feel free to all jump in and post more comments as you wish, even if it is to tell me I'm betraying my 'Ethnic genetic interest' or somesuch. Long as you keep it polite I will post your comments and answer when time permits.

That's It. You Lost Me, Right There.

2006-10-22T19:04:00.000+01:00

Its funny how the small things can be the tipping points. But they are nonetheless important for all that. As Laban Tall rightly points out, there appears to be very little difference between the anti-semitic themes of Left and Right nowadays. The BNP leopard has pretended to change its spots, but whether or not the rhetoric is as violent and vicious as in days gone by, I have been watching the same tired old themes of BNP anti-semitism play themselves out in recent weeks nonetheless. Its the 'Zionist Lobby', the 'neocons', the idea that attacking Iran is a bad idea because...well its what the Jews must want so there must be something wrong with it, right?

I am, as many have observed, a very very angry person. Once upon a time I was a very angry young person who saw his country being raped and his culture murdered, and felt that everyone but those who were standing against that destruction was the enemy. It took me a while to see through what it was they were standing for as well as against, and find out that it was every bit as abhorrent to me as the things I was fighting against. But I learned my lesson.

I really wanted it to be true now, that in the BNP there was a Party that would grow out of its lunatic roots and take a moral stand against the corruption of our country, the degeneration of our morality, the rape and murder of our culture. But it is not to be, I am very much afraid.

You see, I realised something a while back. I may agree with fighting the influence of Islam with every breath in my body, with fighting the Leftist grip on the media, with ending positive discrimination in all its pernicious forms, and yes I do find that I sometimes think things which are sweeping, all-inclusive and target all of a certain group or groups with the same brush. And when I do, I mentally slap myself down and thank my lucky stars for the one thing which keeps me grounded.

My Zionism.

Its my Zionism that keeps me on the straight and narrow. Its my Zionism that keeps me from saying 'its them and us, and only us' every time I see another white man in Court on trumped up charges, or yet another white boy or girl murdered by 'ethnics' as the BNP parlance would have it and ignored by the same media that screams the reverse from the rooftops every time anyone of my ethnic group even looks at somebody from another in the wrong way. Its my Zionism that reminds me where the BNP came from and where, yes, they are still mired no matter how much many of us would desperately like to believe they are not.

So I may rejoin UKIP now Farage has seemingly woken up to what he needs to do to turn them into a true professional Party and a credible force in British politics. I may avoid Party Politics altogether for some time once more. But whatever else happens, one thing is for sure.

I will NOT be voting BNP.

A Message Of Fraternal Greetings To The Former Head Of The Party

2006-10-18T22:55:00.000+01:00

FUCK OFF AND DIE YOU MASS-MURDERING COMMUNIST BASTARD.

That is all.

Notice Any Similarities Anyone?

2006-10-16T17:13:00.001+01:00

Having a quick read through the latest posts at the throughly laudable Anti-Pedophile Blog Absolute Zero United this evening, I came across this one detailing the reactions of the pedo community to the appalling Amish schoolgirls shooting, carried out by a pedophile who let all the boys go and sickeningly even brought certain...accessories with him besides the weapon he used, presumably in anticipation of fulfilling his sick fantasies at last, even if it needed to be at gunpoint.

Looking through the sections quoted, a sudden thought struck me as the pedophiles' blaming of, well, everyone else for forcing the guy to to do it through repressing his rights, orientation, blah blah blah, unfolded in all its creepy glory. Just consider this quote.

"I imagine that, in the wake of the extreme oppression of MAAs (and the consequent sexual repression by MAAs in denial), we will be seeing more of these kinds of shootings in the future. When will society get a clue?"

Now I dont know exactly what MAA stands for, but hey, lets just take one acronym beginning with M out and insert another word beginning with M, shall we? Hmmm...could there be a pattern here?

"Sadly, they reap what they have sown. The news media will never admit to their complicity in such crimes. It does appear that societal repression was a factor that contributed to his crimes. No telling what will happen now."

Now, where have heard something like that before? Try 'from every Muslim pundit or 'representative of the community' ever after a bombing, shooting or terror arrest', that's where.

Isn't it funny how life throws up these little similarities of thought patterns and victimhood...

From The Presumption Of Innocence To The Assumption Of Guilt

2006-10-16T16:55:00.000+01:00

No, this time I am definitely not talking about the EU's recent attempt to shift us to the Napoleonic Code of Corpus Juris, as many other Bloggers and even MSM publicity have managed to cover that topic fairly adequately lately. I did call a couple of Tories waving about a petition about the NHS traitors the other day though so consider that anecdote to be a small sideswipe at the issue.

What DSD wishes to do today is go for that favoured target of his, hypocrisy. And today's lesson, boys and girls, is that old lesson of 'how dare you assume one of US is guilty' screamed from the rooftops until one of them rather than one of 'us' is in the frame for the same kind of thing.

Then, its a different story.

Hang 'em from the lampposts.

And whatever you do, tar and feather the entire BNP with the same brush that mustn't ever, ever be used on Muslims.

My favourite bit is that its a 'record haul of chemicals' - the only evidence for which assertion is that some silly bastard from that well-known organ of journalistic high excellence, Pendle Today, said it was. But this ridiculous lie is shooting around the Leftist blogs like a meteor without any questioning whatsoever because it's very convenient to imagine a huge media blackout descending in Orwellian fashion over the media, always SO friendly to the BNP, lol!

I'm sure some Blogger, somewhere, is blaming the Zionists for not letting the media report on the nefariousness of the Nazis. Er.

So, let's see. Lies? Well, from all sides actually. It seems that the BNP's quickest available local Councillor obviously doesnt think on his feet very well when trying to lie through his teeth to the Press.

Nelson BNP councillor Brian Parkinson said: "I am very shocked and surprised to hear this. I am glad to hear that he is no longer a member of our party because the BNP wouldn't want to be associated with this incident. It certainly wouldn't condone the sort of thing he is allegedly being connected with."

Oopsy. Membership runs from January 1st to december 31st and he stood for you in May? So that means all those 'Ex-BNP man' headlines will now be reworked and another angle added to a hugely embarassing incident for the Party.

Prat. Just handed 'the enemy' a perfect, easy to spot coverup on a plate didnt you? No Cabinet post for you, sunshine.

This pair of Nazi muppets deserve to have the book thrown at them for two reasons if they turn out to be as guilty as they seem to appear. Firstly because if they were intending some kind of terrorist attack (and the fuckwit PC PC who says there are 'not terrorists' just because they were apparently acting alone is wrong) then that's unconscionable.

Secondly because this will now give enormous ammunition to the pro-Islamic Leftists who scweam and scweam and scweam about Timothy McVeigh the 'Christian terrorist' (not that I recall any evidence as to McVeigh having religious inclinations of any kind, but what they really mean anyway is 'white guy') and will now no doubt do the same with these two fucking idiots. So thanks a lot, though I suppose it will be nice to have a little bit of variety in the terror sympathisers whinings about the tiny number of white, oops sorry 'Christian' terrorists as opposed to the serried ranks of Jihadis screaming 'death to everyone'.

And to whichever BNP Regional Organiser or other official failed to vet this nutball properly (or at all!) do yourself a favour and resign now. Unlike Respect or Sinn Fein, terrorism should NOT be a valued tick on a potential officeholder's CV for the BNP - the fact that lunatics with biowarfare suits end up on your roster is yet more proof that your Party is still full of the kind of trash that makes it remain totally unelectable.

(UPDATE or perhaps more of a PS for those who may still come across this post, out of date though it is - does a 'former Green Party Candidate and committed pacifist ' getting eight months for GBH (and no you really couldnt make up "he's a committed pacifist m'lud" as a defence in a GBH trial up, could you?) mean that all Green Party members are mindless thugs who will snap at the slightest provocation? - Hat Tip to Little Bulldogs)

News Roundup - Dhimmis, Babies and Cartoon Conspiracies

2006-10-15T10:03:00.000+01:00

A quick news roundup of the things interesting DSD this week before preparations for my darling future PM's 10th Birthday Party begin in earnest, in no particular order...

Has the teeniest, tiniest fightback against Dhimmitude begun in the unlikely white fascist elite stronghold (not) of Kirklees? A Muslim English teacher has been suspended for refusing to stop wearing her veil during her classes on the not unreasonable grounds that her pupils cannot see her lips moving and get the full enunciation and has I'm told made the hallowed grounds of Radio 1 News according to the future Mrs Right-Wing Zionist Conspirator.

She herself was very impressed the other day when one of her colleagues (who had just told her he was a Muslim - but not 'one of those nutters who thinks all Jews should be killed' as he put it) had it pointed out to him by another colleague that the Koran does actually contain choice lines such as the one about the talking tree with the Jew hiding behind it, so how did he square that? Seems even the hardworking secular world of retail is able to find time to do its research...

However of course we have to have balance, dont we? So to tip the scales back, we have possibly the most shocking one I've heard for, oooh at least a week. Yes, its the Thought Police in our schools at their very worst, those pointless, useless bastards we laughably call 'teachers', showing their utter inability to allow any member of the white race actually born in this country to have even the most basic educational rights, such as being able to actually understand the people she is forced to sit with in class.

“She said I had to sit there with five Asian pupils,” said Codie yesterday. “Only one could speak English, so she had to tell that one what to do so she could explain in their language. Then she sat me with them and said ‘Discuss’.”

According to Codie, the five - four boys and a girl - then began talking in a language she didn’t understand, thought to be Urdu, so she went to speak to the teacher.

“I said ‘I’m not being funny, but can I change groups because I can’t understand them?’ But she started shouting and screaming, saying ‘It’s racist, you’re going to get done by the police’.”

Just for the record, I hope the teacher in question and the PC PC who took the subsequent decision to arrest her both die horribly as a result of being mugged by Somalian Asylum-Seekers and then being unable to communicate with their Pakistani paramedic crew that they are allergic to morphine. Or something like that.

See, now there's a family who will now all almost certainly go and vote BNP en masse along with their neighbours, friends and cousins. And under the circumstances who could really protest that decision?

Flipping topics to something less controversial (yeah right like I'd ever do that hehehe) we have an interesting chappie to alternately boo or hiss or cheer at in the shape of one Dick Devos, Michigan gubernatorial candidate. Dick takes the precise same position as do I on that thorniest of topics, abortion.

"As soon as Roe v. Wade is overturned, which I think we all pray that it will be ... we will revert back to Michigan law," DeVos said Thursday in an interview with Al Kresta, host of the syndicated Catholic talk show "Kresta in the Afternoon" on Ave Maria Radio. "We would go back to that standard, and I would be thrilled about it."

Michigan Law states, as does British Law if only our bastard politicians and doctors would ever stick to it, that abortions should only be performed if their is a demonstrable threat to the health of the mother. Not if, you know, you just got pissed and shagged some complete stranger without a condom.

But Dick, like myself isnt some maddened religious fanatic denouncing abortion with foam-flecked lips. No, he actually takes what would in any sane society be regarded as the middle view.

...he opposed an effort by the anti-abortion organization Michigan Chooses Life to get a measure on the 2006 ballot that would change the state constitution to legally define a person as existing at the moment of conception.

Good for him. I dont buy into that kind of religious nonsense - I take the simple view that once the foetus is sentient enough to properly react to pain stimuli, it is a life that should remain untouchable unless the conditions mentioned above are fulfilled, but not before.

I wasnt aware there was any move to overturn Roe vs Wade in the States. As there apparently is, I wholeheartedly welcome it too along with Mr DeVos.

In Entertainment news, did I mention how much I love South Park? I remember fondly reading this Frontpage Magazine article on the 'Culture War' in praise of the show's irreverent mocking of EVERY Political form, containing the money quote from co-creator Matt Stone:

“I hate conservatives, but I really fucking hate liberals.”

Now you see South Park has really got the Liberals pissed at them - because they have produced a show debunking the 'Truthers', the 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists who believe that, well, it was all just a hoax and the US blew up the Towers. Oh, and of course there were no Jews in the buildings at the time because those crafty evil Zionists were in on it as well. Or did it. Or something. A Blogger named Wuzzadem has tracked the 'Truthers' reactions and it makes for truly hilarious reading...

Here's undoubtedly my favourite quote:

"That would be super-great if the characters in the show actually realize that 9/11 was the work of the Zionist NWO! I think it will cause people to research it for themselves. Is this Cartman character pretty well respected among his friends?"

It must be quite frustrating to be Osama bin Laden sometimes. Not in the sense of failing miserably to establish the global caliphate and having to live in a cave with nothing but a few teenage goatherds for comfort, though I'm sure that's a constant niggle for old Osama. I'm talking about in the sense of meticulously planning, leading and carrying out the most large-scale terrorist atrocity in the past half-century, proudly claiming responsibility for it via your pals in Al-Jazeera and then having half the Muslim world and all your supporters out in the US decide the Jews and the Great Satan must have pulled it off instead!

Man, if he isnt dead in a ditch somewhere that man must be really, really pissed.

I Hope Condi Rice's Neighbours Get Rabies...

2006-10-12T17:38:00.000+01:00

...and then spend the next sixty years trying to shoot, bomb, and otherwise exterminate her. And her children. And her children's children. Even if she hides behind a tree.

"Oh Muslim, there is a Dhimmi bitch hiding behind me pretending to be a Conservative, come and kill her."

My contempt for this woman truly knows no bounds. At every turn she has attempted to bully Israel (and succeeded) and appease Islam in general and the Palestinians specifically. The 'humiliation of occupation' is caused by standing next to another country after voting in a government sworn to exterminate every single citizen of that country. It is caused by teaching your children hatred from the moment they begin what passes for Nursery Education in your sick and perverted society until the day they are old enough to blow up innocent women and children and be hailed as a martyr.

Most of the world thinks its humane to shoot a rabid animal. It certainly needs to be quarantined away from those it wishes to harm until it can be cured.

Only the Left and Condoleeza Rice think that the most important talking point is that the animal is 'humiliated' by the steps the civilised world has to take to deal with it.

I Wonder If Her Insurance Was Covered For 'Minor Altercation'

2006-10-10T20:24:00.000+01:00

See, this is how they do it. This is precisely how they do it, in fact.

Do what?

Turn us into the guilty ones. Turn a mob of 20 Muslims armed with pitchforks, beating a defenceless woman and her family and smashing their car into a 'minor altercation' which has sparked a totally 'disproportionate' (sic) response by the evil hooded white thugs and 'gang members' from the local area. Turn an ongoing dispute involving Muslims telling those uppity whiteys how they are no longer 'allowed' to cross their territory into those uppity whiteys being Islamophobic and committing firebomb attacks.

There are accusations that members of staff from Medina Dairy have been intimidating people as they cut through Shirley Avenue from the recreation ground next to St Edward's Royal Free Ecumenical Middle School.
Lorna Habgood, a mother of two, from Dedworth said: "The security guards from the dairy are aggressive and abusive to mums collecting their kids from school. They won't let anyone down Shirley avenue because they say it's their land."

Slough's local MP, who has presided happily over the complete destruction of her constituency's infrastructure via a mass immigration that makes Barking's look like a picnic, has naturally weighed in to support her intimidated consituents.

Yeah. Right. And back in the real world...

Slough MP, Fiona Mactaggart said: "At any time Islamophobic attacks are unacceptable. In this holy month of Ramadan it is particularly distressing for the Muslim community to be victims of hatred."

Because in Britain 2006 of course, us nasty old racist indigenous white people are never victims of hatred. Only those poor victimised baseball bat wielding Muslims.

She adds:

"I am determined that all other commmunities in this area should stand by them."

Whether they like it or not.

The plot thickens though. After a petrol bomb was thrown from a motorbike at the Dairy...

At 10.30pm an Asian man who had been praying in the dairy's Technor House, said: "A scooter drove past earlier in the night and threw a petrol bomb at the dairy. It exploded on the wall.
"After that a car drove past three times and the last time he wound down the window and said he would be back with a gun."

Or was it? Was it really?

On Wednesday night, at least 30 police officers manned streets surrounding the premises of the dairy in Shirley Avenue, Dedworth, as the feud escalated surrounding the dairy and its prayer room.

Got that? Now, lets try Al-Beeb.

Mounted police have been patrolling outside the dairy, which is part of a complex that also houses an Islamic centre on Vale Road.
Three arrests have been made and more than 20 people were searched by police. There have been no reports of injuries.

So. 30 police officers. Mounted police. Stop and searches. Yet still a biker with a petrol bomb can make it through this cordon sanitaire, and people can make triple drive-bys and roll down the window long enough to deliver a nice detailed death-threat. Am I the only one that thinks this is, well, lies?

Police allege further that a petrol bomb was found 'nearby'. I'm sure if it exists it must have had 'property of whitey' daubed on it, right? Because Allah knows that petrol bombs arent the favourite weapon of choice for any religion we know and love, dont they?

There are those on a few Blogs who have begun talking about this as some kind of great 'fight back' or some such nonsense, and one or two who have swallowed the firebomb story and tried to justify it.

Silly boys and girls.

No one is 'fighting back' here - the police have 'swooped' on the nasty old whiteys and made a few token arrests to make it clear that for once hoodies with blades will not be tolerated. So they gather and glower, whilst the Police make sure they do nothing Islamophobic and the Muslims in the dairy (which the Police have deliberately omitted to search despite a smashed car and a family being beaten - notice that kiddies?) laugh their arses off whilst polishing their weapons for the next time they are not directly under the eye of the PC PCs. When rest assured, they will take revenge in spades.

The moral of this story?

Don't be stupid. This is Britain 2006. There are, as always, no morals in this story.

How Do You Know When A Tory Eurosceptic Is Lying?

2006-10-06T10:12:00.000+01:00

His mouth is open.

I have finally had enough of the Tories. Just enough. At least Labour and the Libarab Democrats are honest about their prejudices and their hatred for our country, its culture and institutions. They are honest about their support of bloated statism, bureaucracy and drip-drip tyranny in the shape of the EU. And in Labour's case a succession of supposed anti-terrorism and anti-hate speech laws under which guise the white Britain on the street can be scooped up and safely squared away for looking funny at anyone on the darker side of pale (unless they're Jewish, that's an exemption because, you know, those nasty old Joooz have just brought it on themselves by being so horrible to terrorists and their supporters) but under which Muslims can publicly call for mass murder on national television and have 'no case to answer'.

But the Tories? Well the Tories of Blu-Labour dont think we have gone far enough in our appeasement. For example, here is the insane case of the Muslim Armed Police Officer who was excused from guarding Jews on the grounds that, well, he doesnt like Jews very much so how could he honestly be expected to protect them from being blown up? Now the reaction of most people except the real moonbats has been to condemn this without qualification, as you would expect - especially when you consider that BNP members are not allowed in the Met as they apparently cannot be trusted to act without favouritism!

But just when you think that for a change here is a case all the parties can more or less agree is pretty cut and dried...here come the Tories to place themselves even further to the moonbat Left than the Labour Party.

Richard Barnes, a Tory member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, accused senior officers of lacking tact. He said: ‘I think it was crass management in the first place. They should have recognised there could have been a problem and not suggested this officer be posted at this embassy.’
‘The Met keep banging on about diversity, but this case shows they have learned very little at all.’

Listen to me Barnes, you motherfucker. If there is any good in this bullshit idea of 'Diversity', its the idea that while we are all different, we should all be treated the same way, by people on the street, and most especially by public institutions and those who serve in them. What 'Diversity' is NOT, and never should be except in your Cameron-coloured world, is an excuse for those public servants to pick and choose who they wish to serve, and in this case protect.

The Tory Party has purely and simply endorsed racism here. The idea that any public servant is free to make moral judgments and then decide to exclude their service from those they deem unfit, immoral or evil for that service is a truly disgusting and pernicious one.

'I got mugged last week, and my mum last year. So I'm not serving you in this Post Office cos you're black and so were the muggers.'

'So what if someone ripped off your veil and spat in your eye? I may be a copper but I dont like Muslims, I was on a tube train on 7/7.'

'No, I'm not letting you through the ticket barrier - you're obviously a Sikh judging by that turban, and Sikhs killed the Prime Minister back in India, the bastards. As a good Hindu I reserve the right not to let you on the train.'

'No way son, I know this is a youth club for everyone but well, you have to understand that as a Jew I feel you bear some responsibility for what is happening to the Palestinians. So you're not getting in.'

Are we getting the picture now Barnes, you piece of shit? I hope you have a heart attack and then the attending ambulancemen see your little blue rosette and decide to leave you gasping by the wayside on the grounds that they vote Labour and can't stand Tories, or hey maybe they could even be Muslims who just gosh darn it HATE WHITE BRITISH MEN.

Goddamn it I hate the Conservative Party v.2006 so very, very much.

Quote Of The Month

2006-09-30T19:32:00.000+01:00

Yes, its that time again...

This month it would have been very easy to cop out and take one of the many unintentionally funny 'Good Conservative' quotes from around the British Blogosphere and embarass those stalwart defenders of 'Westminster at any price' politics still further. But no, I am determined that this award shall remain one of merit rather than amusement.

So without further ado I give you this month's lucky winner, Laban Tall of UK Commentators, with a short but extremely sweet quote on the subject of London's beloved Mayor.

On the Today programme at 8.35 this morning, Ken says that
multiculturalism's working.

"Religiously-motivated attacks have declined ...."

I missed him saying "... although admittedly one of them was rather
large".

All The News They REALLY Dont Want You To Hear

2006-09-27T16:19:00.000+01:00

Via the man who I'd vote for if he formed a political party (see comments here), a touching story of how our multicultural enrichment is being vibrantly illustrated each and every night of Ramadan in the very heart of our new European nation, as the local population enjoys the colourful spectacle of Brussels' Islamic community indulging in its traditional annual ritual.

Of rioting, beating up police, torching cars and shops and throwing molotov cocktails into hospitals.

Yet strangely despite all matters Brussels-related normally being fawningly right at the top of the MSM's agenda, as Stan points out Al-Beeb and every newspaper but the Scotsman have managed to miss this one. Whatever can be going on?

All the news except the bits they dont want you to know about.

Why Is There Never One Of Those Surgical Strike Thingies Around When You Need One? (Warning: Extreme Rant)

2006-09-25T16:21:00.000+01:00

Seriously.

Just think of how many of Britain's problems could have been solved in one stroke. Seeing as its only a 'tiny minority of extremists' anyway, we could have got rid of a huge percentage of the problem with one sweet little flight of jets. All those cunts in Hezbollah shirts declaring how they are 'Victorious', all the pieces of shit who think wearing Palestinian bandanas is cool and radically chic, in fact every single one of the scum who turned the perfectly reasonable sentiment of 'Fuck Off Mr Blair, Your Time Is Up' into an anti-semitic, pro-terrorism hatefest.

My favourite is the smug little shit standing in front of the Respect banner which is laughably subtitled 'Peace Justice Equality'. Holding a T-shirt with the Hezbollah symbol on it.

Come to Christchurch you bunch of utter, utter cunts. Come here and I'll fucking take you down altogether or one at a time. I don't give a fuck how many of you there are, I'll leave every single one of you bleeding if it takes me all day. Muslims, Respect, Greens, Communists, Southampton Socialists (your only up the road, maybe I'll come and pay you a visit you motherfuckers), StopTheWar (as long as it isnt the one against Jews, right?), Socialist Workers, I dont care. I'll put every single one of you on the floor and smear pigfat all over your faces with my Size Eights.

This is my fucking Jihad, and it tastes good.

(Rant Ends, normal slightly more restrained service will be resumed when I calm down a bit.)

How To Answer Your Own Question - The Kinky Tory Masochists Strike Again

2006-09-24T19:56:00.000+01:00

I've said it before...and I'll say it again. 'Good Conservatives' (cue gag reflex) are kinky, perverse little masochists who like nothing better than to have a Mark Oaten moment every time their leadership opens their mouths.

Why a Mark Oaten moment? Because old Mark gets off on being crapped on only marginally more than 'Good Conservatives' do.

Take this chappie. After Call Me Dave made his latest anti-English-and-everything-remotely- Conservative-in-nature speech, our Gav got all upset, bless him.

"The thing is, I really don’t know why he did it. There’s absolutely no logical value in making a poisonous speech that make angry a proportion of 85% of the population in order to placate a proportion of 11% of the population."

Here's why Gav. In your own words, in the very next paragraph.

"I am Conservative, and despite the tone of the speech, I will remain Conservative and proud of it."

And also the priceless:

"I know that the membership won’t leave the party over this one issue; but Cameron must know what dangers he is running with his membership."

Translation: "Ooooh yes Mistress Dave, abuse me even more, that's it, call me misguided, tell me again how I have to abandon Conservatism to get a Conservative government, ooooh yeeeeeeeeeeeessssssss!!! Oh darling, you know I could never leave you no matter how bad you treat me..."

There is nothing the man can do to lose your vote Gav, and the smug wanker knows it too. That's why he can afford to publicly abandon every principle beloved of his 'core voters' like yourself and go scrabbling as far down in the dirt as Labour and the Libarab Democrats. Because your vote is totally, utterly sewn up. You can whinge, whine, protest, bluster all you like. But you'll still keep right on voting Tory, working for the Tories, delivering leaflets containing policies you disagree with featuring the utterances of a man you despise. Because you are addicted to the Conservative Party, body and soul. Accept no substitutes, for all your statements such as:

"The Conservative Party is almost alone in the United Kingdom as a reasonable right-wing party. But if that were to change then I am sure the majority of blogging right-wingers would jump at the chance to join that new party."

Yeah right. UKIP's been there for a while now and for all its failings fulfills that criteria perfectly. If all the Tories who voted for them in 2004 hadnt acted in 2005 like cattle returning to the nice warm barn despite the door being left wide open with a huge landscape full of juicy grass just in the next field, we might be looking at a very different political landscape now. That 'rightwing alternative' would be a viable and powerful political force instead of a 'fringe party'.

But you did go back into the nice warm barn Gav. And there you will stay, making statements to those who urge you to leave it like "Well yes I understand that the abattoir is always a possibility, but if we leave the barn then outside it might be even worse."

If I'd had a pound for every Gav I met during the last Election Campaign I could have probably bought the entire 150 or so UKIP members in Christchurch a meal and got the beers in too. And frankly those 'Good Conservatives' who have sat back and watched this country and most of all their Party go to rack and ruin are enough to drive anyone to drink.

Islam: The Screaming Toddler In The Supermarket

2006-09-23T11:10:00.000+01:00

The Dick List nails it again.

Happy Rosh Hashanah...

2006-09-22T20:36:00.000+01:00

...to all evil Zionist Conspirators everywhere. May a New Year bring new hope and new strength.

DSD

The Rally The MSM Forgot - And A Question For That Nice Mr Olmert

2006-09-22T09:15:00.000+01:00

Just as not a single British media outlet covered the pro-Israeli rally in Kenton, NW London a few weeks ago, so it goes with what should theoretically be big news in New York, outside the UN to be precise. Now seeing as we have pictures of every moonbat, anti-western, anti-Jewish and pro-Jihadi rally that involves more than two old burqa-clad ladies and their dog Wufi splashed all over the pages of the MSM, you'd think that 30,000 plus people demonstrating against Ahmadinejihad's presence at the UN to spread his evil poison would be equally big news.

Nuh-uh.

The mighty Atlas has pictures and video.

Elsewhere, Little Green Footballs also brings us a touching little tableau of a Spanish 'peacekeeper' demonstrating his allegiance to the cause of neutrality...by happily shaking the hand of a Hezbollah supporter on his way to the enormous victory rally about to take place in Beirut.

The VICTORY rally? Got that Olmert, you blithering idiot? Because thanks to your cowardice, because of your desperate clinging to the futile belief that the UN is on anyone's side but the Jihadists, because of your pathetic media whoring, you now have more foreign troops on Lebanese soil.

Troops that will act as even more effective human shields for Hezbollah than the Lebanese Shia. Troops that will willingly stand by just as UNIFIL did and watch the weapons and rockets flow into Southern Lebanon, and will not simply wring their hands about it but in some cases actually applaud. Troops, however, that will be in place at strategic points to prevent large-scale Israeli ground incursions into Lebanon when they are needed in the future. And you know they will be, because your commanders and Mossad will have told you that the weapons and rockets are flowing once again into Lebanon, that Hezbollah is gearing up for another round.

And what are you doing? Are you striking those convoys as they enter Lebanon? Are you insisting that the UN make an attempt to enforce Resolution 1559 and at least make some show of neutrality? Are you screaming the duplicity of the UN (which funnily enough the entire pro-Israeli Blogosphere could see coming from the somewhat limited vantage point of our monitors, but you apparently couldnt) from the rooftops as we are?

No. He isnt. This is the man who has told us that Israel is 'tired of fighting, tired of winning'. That the Holocaust-denying Mahmoud Abbas, PA leader, a specimen whose doctoral thesis was based on Holocaust denial and the idea that 'the Zionists' actually cooperated in the Holocaust (that didnt happen, but such is the schizoid nature of Arab intellectualism) in order to displace the Palestinians is a 'courageous partner'. He says that Jacques Chirac is 'one of the greatest fighters against anti-Semitism in the world' (!)

So are you doing for your people right now, Mr Olmert? What are you doing to make sure rockets never rain down on Haifa again? To secure the release of your captured soldiers, which you promised you would do before any ceasefire with Hezbollah or withdrawal from Lebanon took place? What are you there for, if you cant do these things?

I'd really like to know.

Consider Me A Floating Voter

2006-09-18T18:44:00.000+01:00

I want to try an experiment. Consider me one of the 'non-Core' floating voters - right now my vote is indeed genuinely up for grabs. I am a former UKIP Branch Chairman and activist, voted Tory once when there was no UKIP (and before Maastricht). Persuade me which (UK) Party I should vote for (or not), and why I should do so.

I await comments with curiosity. I'm sure someone will have an opinion worth reading, and if your from somewhere else but you know a bit about our situation, well dont be afraid to throw your two penneth in either.

Dear Nazi Muppets...

2006-09-18T14:35:00.000+01:00

...I'm not interested in what you have to say, feel free to keep wasting your time posting but be aware nobody but you will ever see any of the comments except yourself once you've cleaned the sperm off your monitor after getting off a particularly good one about how Jews are even ugly to look at 'as well'.

Love and kisses from DSD

Peace Activists In Their Natural Habitat

2006-09-14T13:57:00.000+01:00

I have always maintained that scum like Christian 'Peace'Makers and the International Solidarity Movement are not peace protesters and are in fact simply supporters of those who war against our society. Normally I'd expect to have to make a fairly detailed argument such as this one to defend that position, but sometimes life just throws you a gift you can't pass up...I have to be honest and admit that I often dont read the Frontpage articles which pass in front of me despite being on their daily mailing list, because they are often far too lengthy and convoluted for a simple soul like me. This one however I thoroughly recommend.

So without further ado...I give you the peace-loving activists of the International Solidarity Movement, who are absolutely to be trusted when they are telling us how it is the Israelis who are the violent ones. Honest.

STOP THE ISM.

We're Not Good Enough To Deserve The Left

2006-09-14T13:50:00.000+01:00

Apparently.

So says our '9/11 protester', informing us that:

"I’m absolutely sure that there were good people that died in the towers, and not all evil hateful monsters like those there yesterday pretending to mourn. I dedicate my protest to any good person that died in the buildings, but it’s sad to say, those people I encountered yesterday in mass, are not worth protesting for. Next time they’re government kills them, I might just stay home and be quiet."

That'd be nice. And when you're next lecturing us about our racism in targeting people of Middle Eastern appearance with bushy beards and big coats you could slip a suicide bomb under, just remember these immortal words:

"Some Jew looking dude in a suit came up to me and asked “where are you from?” I said “PA”, and he said “you should go back to PA, asshole” and walked away. It took me by suprise, and I started laughing, I thought about saying “you should go back to Israel.”

'Some Jew-lookin dude' ?!?!?

Little Green Footballs has reprinted the whole thing, complete with casual anti-semitism, bad grammar and cognitive dissonance. Read it all, then decide whether laughing or crying is a better option.

Sorry, Didnt You All Get The 'Jews Control The Media' Memo?

2006-09-14T13:42:00.000+01:00

I'm confused. The Arabs, the neo-Nazis and the Jew-hating Left usually tell us how Israel controls the worldwide media, so how come these rich Arabs think they can buy themselves biased coverage just by, you know, buying themselves biased coverage? Dammit people, didnt you get the memo?

Britain's Muslims Are All Potential Terrorists, by the Muslim Council of Britain

2006-09-14T13:06:00.000+01:00

From the horse's goddamned mouth. Funny how when we say it we are Islamophobes and racists, but when the grandly named Secretary-General of the Muslim Council of Britain actually makes a specific and explicit threat that it is going to happen if we dont do what we're told, then does this mean those of us who have said before are no longer Islamophobes but actually spreading the word of the MCB on Allah's behalf?

Can we call Dr Bari (successor to Iqbal 'hang the homos' Sacranie) an Islamophobe now for these wonderfully illuminating words?

"But some police officers and sections of the media are demonising Muslims, treating them as if they're all terrorists — and that encourages other people to do the same. If that demonisation continues, then Britain will have to deal with two million Muslim terrorists — 700,000 of them in London," he said. "If you attack a whole community, it becomes despondent and aggressive."

Dyu know old bean, you're right. When you attack a whole community indiscriminately, it does usually react rather badly. But unlike the Muslim 'community', the community that is the rest of Britain (black, white, brown, yellow, atheist, Christian, Sikh, Jewish, Hindu) hasnt responded to being attacked physically on 7/7 by becoming aggressive. No British mosques are being torched or bombed, no lynch mobs are surging through the streets with nooses at the ready to hang the first burqa-clad female they see. It simply isnt happening.

In fact instead of whining endlessly about racism, demonisation and Islamophobic persecution, the Muslim community of Britain ought to be down on its collective knees thanking Allah that this country is the way it is. That despite the provocation of murder and mayhem, of crowds calling for the beheading of those opposed to their religion, of people like Doctor Bari threatening terrorism if his host nation doesnt toe the line of Dhimmitude he wants it to, the community that is Britain is failing to follow the same route he says his 'community' is going to if his 'community' doesnt do what we want it to.

Which is to stop whining, stop threatening, stop obstructing the police, stop attempting to force us to follow somebody else's religious laws and instead start supporting us to root out those in his community's midst who think that terrorism is the way to get what you want.

Random Thoughts on Path to 9/11 Part 1

2006-09-11T08:07:00.000+01:00

Firstly, in purely cinematic terms...wow. Fantastically gritty docudrama style photography, edgy close up shots of the key players such as Harvey Keitel, last seen by this Zionist Conspirator in the excellent National Treasure delivering wonderful lines such as 'This is not a day for Um'. The characterisations were all quite believable as well, the portrait of the hideous Madeline Albright was so accurate physically and vocally that it made this Blogger want to gouge his eyes out at the sheer horror of the Wrinkled Queen Of Appeasement.

The history behind the drama went right the way back to the first World Trade Centre bombing back in 1993, and from the word go gave us convincing characterisations of the FBI and CIA teams involved with the ongoing investigations, if not always of those they were tracking. I wasnt overly impressed with the idea of Ramzi and Khalid sitting in a decadent western nightclub drinking and dirty dancing with black women in unlikely makeup - artistic licence taken a bit too far there methinks. The portrait of Zawahiri was eerily believable however.

Interestingly, the soon to be Mrs Zionist Conspirator sat through it quite happily, asking questions aplenty, particularly about Afghanistan. Now regular visitors to this Blog know exactly how I feel about Afghanistan and the way we have treated the Northern Alliance who actually did 90% of the dying and groundfighting in Afghanistan - much the same way I feel about Iraq, and the equally despicable way we treated the Kurds who shed a large amount of their own blood and have been pushed aside. The portrait of the Northern Alliance warlord Masoud was quite excellent, I must find the name of the chap who played him.

'Are there any men left in Washington?' asks Masoud when the order not to go after Bin Laden because of worries over 'civilian casualties' (hey how does 2996 civilian casualties grab you) is given. 'Or only cowards?'

Cowards, old bean. This was the Clinton Administration.

'I bet he did sleep with her though, right?' asked the Zionist Conspirator Fiance when Clinton's infamous 'I never had sexual relations with that woman' denial was briefly screened. Well, she was only a teenager at the time so why should she know about US presidential history? A two-minute potted 'events that prove Bill Clinton was a philandering lying scumbag traitor to the American people' lesson ensued, though as I pointed out if you want a fairly clear pre-Whitehouse biopic that does everything but call its central characters Bill and Hillary, you could just go watch the excellent 'Primary Colors'.

As we watched events such as the folied Millenium bomb plot unfold, we mused on the basic problem with the combatting of terrorism. Namely that people really dont take notice when a bomb plot is foiled. It hasnt hurt anyone (well unless your an Islamic child pornographer from Forest Gate anyway), and life just goes on as it did before. Ironically, the better the security services do their jobs, the less help and support they get from a fickle, media-brainwashed public that would rather believe the Guardian when it says that its all made up and the latest terror raids are meant to take pressure off Tony Blair in some fashion.

She did laugh when I told her that the latest bunch of bearded Islamofascists to be caught with their pants and bombmaking equipment down have had their martyrdom videos unearthed in Wycombe Forest - how embarassing for them in Court...the phrase 'bang to rights' rather covers it methinks.

I await Part 2 tonight though I will have to wait until Tuesday to watch it as Conception has its first full pre-Committee meeting tonight in Ferndown - I will ask for a minute's silence, I hope someone else will do the same.

Because no matter how many plots we foil, we should never forget the ones we didnt.

Prison Works

2006-09-10T12:17:00.000+01:00

Now this is the kind of initiative I can get behind. Prison Works is a brand new cooperative site intending to draw together all the masses of statistics on crime from around the UK, US and Europe and to prove that, indeed, 'Prison Works'. Loads of excellent articles with the raw data as opposed to massaged nonsense put out by the likes of the Howard League For Never Jailing Anyone Ever.

'Our position is that prisons work - if we make them.'

Couldnt agree more.

(hat tip to David Vance at Tangled Web)

Do You Know, I Don't Think Even The Devil Likes That Nice Mr Blair Very Much

2006-09-08T13:34:00.000+01:00

Really.

I always thought Blair was the Devil myself - he has all the essential ingredients but the horns, and we only know that they aren't on his head...but the Devil in question here also notes that the dictator-in-chief hasnt actually said he is going to go as PM - just Party Leader - can it be that the arch-manipulator of the English language has managed to pull the wool over his own Party's eyes just as he has done to the country so many times? Read the words he used, supplied by Guido at the above link:

"The next party conference in a couple of weeks will be my last party conference as party leader, the next TUC conference next week will be my last TUC - probably to the relief of both of us."

There is, indeed, absolutely no commitment there to step down as PM. None at all. And before you say anything along the lines of 'how could he expect to perpetrate such a monstrous fraud' etc etc just remember who the hell it is your talking about! The man's premiership has been one endless succession of 'we would do it but we just CANT' moments which by now virtually nobody is believing except the same kind of people who think Mossad demolished the Twin Towers. This country is fucked, people, and this evil bastard was the one at the top overseeing it all.

Step down? He will have to be carried out of the door kicking, screaming, holding desperately onto the lintel while a burqa-clad Cherie flails ineffectually away at the Police dragging him out with her handbag full of the latest wad of cash wrung from suing under the Human Rights legislation her dear hubby pushed through Parliament.

Heh, actually do you know what, that's quite an entertaining image...anybody got any better scenarios for the final moment of departure? Answers in the comments please...

Quoty Quoty Quoty

2006-09-08T10:06:00.000+01:00

Ladies and gents, I give you some more choice little moments from around the Blogosphere to be going on with...the first from Rottypup's new poster child, the charmingly namd Ranting Guttersnipe on the subject of Blair's supposedly imminent departure from office.

Mr Guttersnipe has fisked the Mirror's fawning article on this very subject in admirably blunt fashion:

Says The Mirror:

Mr Blair's final weeks in office will be particularly carefully choreographed to ensure cheers rather than jeers. Under the heading "Last month" the memo suggests: "Needs a daily grid, planned to the last detail. As much as possible a farewell tour, looking to the future, making sure the party is in the right place and the public remember him as he should be."

Says Mr Guttersnipe:

Rather than remember him as he was .... a limelight hugging statist control freak fucking camera whore with delusions of putting the rest of world to rights while shafting Britain up the ass with a pineapple?

Can't really argue with that one myself frankly. And on the subject of Rotty, well we all know that he and I are from very different schools of thought on the subject of Blair - I'm with Mr Guttersnipe, he is of a rather different opinion on the man himself, but it appears we are in complete agreement as to the vile nature of his Political Party:

"See, while Conservatives (right-thinking ones, anyway) are willing to give Blair huge credit for standing firm against Islamofascism, leftists everywhere loathe him for just this very reason. George Bush, closer ties with the U.S., the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq — Sooner or later, Labour back-benchers had to snap.

As it turns out, the final straw was Blair’s refusal to join them in condemning Israel for acting in her own defence. Given the almost-pathological levels of anti-Semitism present in the British left, perhaps this isn’t so surprising. But. Still. If Blair does fall over this issue, you couldn’t wish for a better example of all that’s wrong with leftism:

Wreck the country you’re supposed to be governing and they’ll smile approvingly — Try to prevent a second Holocaust and they’ll fire you."

Now THAT last line is right on the money.

Lessons The Media Is Determined Not To Learn

2006-09-07T08:48:00.000+01:00

The latest for those who missed it: the new media 'screwup' concerns manifold lurid reports of Israel supposedly targeting Red Cross Ambulances in Lebanon. With Zionist missiles that dont explode and small-arms fire from drones, so sophisticated that they can hit the same helmet on three different people at the same time, throw someone '25 feet in a huge fireball' and leave him completely uninjured to pose for the cameras a couple of days later, shear someone's right leg off without any blood, have it grow back and even replace the left one, remove ventilation domes from the top of ambulances, and even cave in windscreens inwards from the inside.

Those wacky old Jewish war criminals eh? Whatever will they come up with next?

Here's the long, extended-edition debunking from Zombietime. But for a fairly decent summary with a soundtrack to nod your head along to, My Pet Jawa does it again.

No more posts today. Coursework beckons.

Some Quotes That Say It All

2006-09-06T18:42:00.000+01:00

Blogging is light this week due to other commitments, but the following were so perfectly worded that I just had to repeat them:

From the daily EU Observer Email bulletin of 4th September, headlined 'Brussels to keep national parliaments on short leash', this unintentionally honest subtitle:

"The European Commission will from next week onwards start to send its proposals for EU laws directly to national parliaments for comment - but it has made clear that it will not review any of its plans if national deputies dislike them."

Subtle...

And via Laban Tall, this gem of true vision of the morally bankrupt insanity that is modern British policing from the homepage of True Vision, yet more taxpayers money well spent on enforcing 'diversity' in our supposedly free society.

"The Police define a homophobic incident as "Any incident which is perceived to be homophobic by the victim or any other person." So there is no excuse for not making an accusation against a homophobe. You don't need any evidence. Evidence is not the test. Perception is all that is required."

'You don't need any evidence'. Never was a truer word spoken. And my 'perception' is that this country is being buttfucked by our PC PCs and the likes of True Vision even more deeply than their male members are buttfucking each other.

Was that too strong? Nah...actually I think its a pretty apt metaphor. After all, no evidence is required that the state of affairs is as I say it is.

Just my perception.

UPDATE: Oops...how red is my face? That'll teach me not to read to the bottom of the page...see comments. On the other hand I dont feel too bad for being fooled by the first few paragraphs - because the quote I used IS precisely the criteria the PC PCs use.

Life Imitating Art...

2006-09-04T14:47:00.000+01:00

Off politics for once, the news that Steve Irwin has died in a rather predictable manner has percolated through to sunny Christchurch. The reason this caught my eye is an odd one - I once have very amusing memories of playing a very similar character in a LARP a few years ago.

The game was played with characters in the 'Wraith' setting, where the main thing the layman needs to know is that the participants are already dead, and are now ghosts of a sort. So what did myself and my three friends choose to have been in our past lives on this occasion?

Well, we chose to be Aussie 'danger naturalists' called Bruce, Bruce, Bruce and Sheila who had all died in spectacularly silly ways, such as my character for example who had if memory serves been performing live on camera dental surgery on the back teeth of a very large hippopotamus who took exception to his work and bit down. Hard.

All four of us dressed in a mix of rattling chains and survival gear and proceeded to act in spectacularly silly and suicidally bold fashion against the Spectres which were trying to break into our ghostly train and do horrible things to our departed spirits...it was a very funny character concept which at the time was art imitating life, until today at least when the man we were emulating turned the tables on us and went out in exactly the way I'm sure he would have wanted.

The Collateral Damage Of The Christ

2006-09-01T16:29:00.000+01:00

(Not as punchy a title as, say Mel 'Its the Jooz Fault Officer' Gibson might have come up with, but what the hell...)

On BCBBC News...

"Church Leaders, the United Nations and senior Labour MPs tonight have expressed their opposition to continued Christian aggression against idolaters, panderers and usurers in what will become Occupied Palestine. Far-Right Fundamentalist Christian extremist Jesus Christ attacked a temple with indiscriminate use of whips and possibly even chemical weapons, causing enormous collateral damage to the peaceful inhabitants."

You think I'm being totaly surreal? No, I'm not a proper surrealist (well, except when I'm playing with my nine-year old and her Barbarian Baby Bears but that's another story), just a sarcastic rightwinger who likes ripping it out of the Left, particularly its ecclesiastical arm known as the CofE. This guy however, a Canon of the Church of England, is actually being SERIOUS.

"We cannot simply ignore the violent passion of Jesus cleansing the temple with whips. We are never told of the collateral damage possibly resulting from his action ..."

(via Laban Tall)

A Perfect Example...

2006-09-01T15:51:00.000+01:00

...of a Leftist Jew-hater. Go and read the thoughts of 'Cunningham' on that good old canard, the influence of Jewish (*cough, cough*, sorry, 'Israeli') 'interests' on American foreign policy. There are such gems as the one below on Ahmadinejihad, and doubtless will be more once he reads my, erm, blunt reply:

"Ahmadinejad is mad, bad and dangerous. But he was elected in a more or less democratic process, and there is no easy way to get rid of him."

You have to ask yourself what colour the sky is in this idiot's world. Purple perhaps. But the real thrust of his comment becomes very clear right at the end:

"The US, and the world, is therefore now dependent on the good-old UN. This loss of clout is all a result of the mismanagement by the present US administration, and specifically of its eagerness to tie its middle-east policy to Israel’s self-interest."

Yep, its ZOG and the Vast Zionist Conspiracy all over again. Our Middle-East expert Cunningham informs us that the US didnt invade Afghanistan because it was pursuing the people who killed thousands of its citizens on 9/11, presumably that was just a smokescreen - actually the Jews told them to do it! And Iraq? Yep, 'Israeli self-interest' again apparently.

I'd love to know what exactly it is Cunningham and his fellow Jew-haters believe Israel actually GETS out of all this supposed influence on US Foreign Policy. What possible interest of Israel's has been served by either the invasion of Iraq or that of Afghanistan? By Condi 's cosying up to every Muslim she can lay her hands on, bless her Dhimmi heart? By the US agreeing to try and force Israel to accept a ceasfire which it is obvious is worth absolutely nothing to her?

But there is no interest being served of course. The Leftist horror at the thought of any Government standing up to the savagery of Islamic terrorism is only explicable to them provided that somewhere behind it all must be a Jew pulling the strings - after all, the Left has no problem with the Jews being 'wiped off the map' if it appeases Islam, so naturally if anyone else does it must all be a 'conspiracy', mustnt it?

The thought that anyone might stand up for Israel because they think its the right thing to do just never enters their morally bankrupt little minds.

Israel

Quote of the Month

2006-08-31T22:53:00.000+01:00

Continuing on the popular (well, with me anyway) series after DumbJon's excellent effort last month, this month's award slips in just before the clock strikes midnight. Its that man I'm probably the only man crosser than, that good old Devil, Mr, erm, Kitchen, with this little gem on the subject of the EU.

"I would like all of you to think about this every night before you go to bed: "if I vote Labour, LibDem or Tory then I am a traitor—to the Crown, to Britain and to the very concept of democracy—and I should be beaten like a pinata. For starters."

Utterly, completely true.

EU

Mike Jericho Joins The Ranks

2006-08-30T12:22:00.000+01:00

Which ranks? These ones. The ranks of those like me who, as Mike himself puts it, 'openly and freely admit that the attempt to bring Democracy to Iraq has been a dismal failure'.

I particularly liked this line:

"I propose that not a dime more be spent nor a drop more of western blood be spilled in seeking to make tame the savages who populate the region. It is a phyricc exercise which we can ill afford to indulge in."

I second that proposal wholeheartedly, oh my yes I do.

What angered him off so? Mike was writing this in response to this Telegraph article.

"Thousands of jubilant Iraqis looted the British military base in Amarah yesterday, only a day after the Army pulled out of the camp. Everything from doors and window frames to corrugated roofing and metal pipes was pillaged from Camp Abu Naji, previously Britain's only permanent base in Maysan province."

Great. Note the 'jubilant' part. Sounds kinda familiar doesnt it - what's with this Arab compulsion to steal everything that isnt nailed down?

"The Queen's Royal Hussars had departed Camp Abu Naji on Thursday, taking up new positions in the desert and marshes near the border with Iran. The British stressed that the redeployment was a tactical move, not a withdrawal. But this was not how Iraqis viewed it. As news spread through Amarah that the British had gone, locals rushed on to the streets shouting "God is great" and drivers sounded their horns in celebration.

Hundreds gathered around the local offices of Moqtada al-Sadr, the radical Shia cleric whose followers had fired 281 mortar rounds and rockets at the camp, to offer their congratulations. A loudspeaker repeatedly broadcast the triumphant message: "This is the first Iraqi city that has kicked out the occupiers." "

Got all that? We are not the liberators, even though we spent years and hundreds of millions of pounds (perhaps billions) protecting these bastards from Saddam with the no-fly zone and then removed the man who had oppressed them for decades from power. No, we are the 'Occupiers' who have mortar shells and rockets fired at us and then respond with truncheons and riot shields.

Such overwhelming gratitude, you BASTARDS.

"First indications of what would follow came a few hours later as a crowd gathered outside Camp Abu Naji. Iraqi soldiers positioned inside the base dispersed them with shots into the air.
But the following morning a mob of between 2,000 and 5,000 returned, hundreds of them armed with machineguns and rocket-propelled grenades. After sporadic fighting the Iraqi troops retreated to a corner of the camp as the base was stripped."

So that policy of NOT disarming/imprisoning/wiping out al-Sadr and his murdering lunatics when we had them pinned in Najaf and instead letting them go to murder again has really worked well for the West then. All that time, all those dead British troops, all those squaddies who risked their lives to come home to the hate of 'our' Muslim population, all those resources - and within a single day of leaving our friendly 'house-Iraqis' to take control they fold and let the enemy take over control again.

There is no purpose to us being there any longer. I remember when the idea of regime change was first mooted watching a hilarious BBC 'debate' on the subject, hijacked as usual by a bearded pundit who clamed that 9/11 was actually carried out by Mossad and the Jews, the Jews control the media blah blah blah. What also stood out was a moment when a monumentally smug Islamic 'academic' from Bradford or some other blight on the British landscape informed the audience that no matter how we debated, however hard we tried to bring democracy to a country such as Iraq, it was 'incompatible with the tenets of Islam'. I was appalled at the statement at the time, but now I know why the bastard was so smug.

Because he was right, and he knew it too.

Iraq

A Small Note To The Lebanese People

2006-08-28T20:14:00.000+01:00

I don't know Irwin Graulich. But I think I like him. He is apparently President/CEO of his own rather successful business, so isnt in the position of, say, the unfortunate Inigo Wilson where he can be fired for not exactly expressing the 'right' viewpoints.

Mr Graulich hits things rather succinctly on the head with his diatribe to the Lebanese, and frankly sets the ground which I rather feel we ought to have been fighting all along about the 'conflict' in Lebanon and Israel (I do not call it a 'conflict in Lebanon'). And I say this as someone who has posted extensively about Qana, perhaps to the detrimental exclusion of what should have been equally extensive commenting the morality of both sides in the actual 'conflict' itself.

Mr Graulich, you have pretty much covered it from my point of view, even if the pitiful PM Olmert didnt exactly live up to your expectations. Thanks for saving me the typing time.

Those Poor, Innocent Lebanese By Irwin N. Graulich August 4, 2006

Let me get this straight. You allow one of the largest terrorist organizations in the world to set up shop throughout your country. You permit them to completely take over the entire southern third of your country and you claim to have seen nothing.You allow the terrorists to build sophisticated, fortified bunkers and you did not see any heavy equipment building them. You allow the Hezbollah terrorists to move into many of your towns and villages, including the complete takeover of one of the largest neighborhoods in Beirut, where they proceed to build numerous, complex command and control centers ... and you claim ignorance.

You allow the terrorists to store weapons, bombs and rockets in your basements. You turn a blind's eye when they carry arms into your restaurants, stores and buildings. Yet you call yourself an "innocent civilian."You sleep with dogs, you wake up with fleas. You sleep with missiles, you wake up dead.You watch the parades with hundreds of thousands of participants including children screaming, "Jihad. Death to Israel, Jews and Americans," burning American and Israeli flags. Goose-stepping soldiers with Nazi-like salutes receive your cheers--and all of you "innocent civilians" did not see a thing (even though you were captured on videotape).There are giant posters of the rubenesque terrorist leader, Hasan Nasrallah, all over Lebanon with headlines declaring the imminent destruction of Israel. Yet you choose to elect this terrorist
party to your government--and all of the so called "innocent Lebanese" do not know anything about anything.Twenty thousand rockets and launchers are shipped into your country along with other military equipment by plane, truck and ship, and the government industrial complex knew absolutely nothing; and neither did all those "poor, innocent civilians" who are now crying.

The Lebanese "knowingly allowed (aka aided and abbetted)" murderous terrorists to proliferate in their sovereign nation. Like spoiled teenagers, they now refuse to take any responsibility. Of course there are some truly innocent civilians, but there were hundreds of thousands of beautiful German babies and mothers in Dresden and Berlin who were blown to bits. If an attack emanates from your country, the entire country is responsible. That is how life works. Sometimes it is unfair.I hate when people lie to my face and expect me to believe
their vile fabrications. Does the Muslim world really think that the vast majority of Americans are that foolish? Only the quislings at CNN like Larry King, Nic Robertson, Wolf Blitzer, et al will fall for this Joseph Goebbels-style propaganda.The confused, immoral left and their paper of record, The New York Times only see "innocent civilians throughout Lebanon." Europe, that moral bastion which gave birth to Nazism, will look at photos of men, women and children in despair, without putting the image into its proper context. Yet countries like Sweden, Switzerland and Ireland, who could not decide whether to support Hitler or Churchill during WWII, can drum up the moral authority to criticize Israel today. And leave it to Vichy, France 2006 headed by Jaques "Petain" Chirac to condemn Israel's response.

Seeing television snippets of wounded or dead Lebanese with people sitting on the ground crying and calling them all "innocent civilians" is the same as looking at a photograph of the armpit of Christie Brinkley and saying, "Here is the photo of a supermodel. Isn't she beautiful?"

The armpit picture is only a part of the story. When human beings see babies or mothers hurting, no matter what, we feel the pain. If we saw baby pictures of Charles Manson, we would want to cuddle him.We cannot look at photos of so-called "innocent civilians" in a vacuum. It is important for all "moral, decent" human beings to realize that the compassion emotion is similar to the sex emotion. Often times, it interferes with truth, logic and morality. Listen up, all you "Innocent Lebanese along with your innocent, Hezbollah supporting government." Do you want to know why your towns, villages and cities are smoldering? Do you want to know why 800,000 people are homeless and 600 are dead? Do you want to know why your infrastructure
is devastated?

The answer is: The Jews are simply not going to pack up their little valises and walk into gas chambers again. The Jews will not be taken from their homes and marched into the Mediterranean Sea by Nazis or Hezbollah-Hamas-Syrian-Iranian, Nazi-like sympathizers. The Jews in Israel or anywhere else are just not going to allow themselves to be shipped away like you dream about every day. Attention all radical Muslims throughout the entire world and Jacques Chirac. The Jews will not be walking into death camps or graves ever again, and if you dare try it, Qana, Tyre, Nabatiyeh, Bint Jbeil, Kounine, Beit Yahoun, Rashaya, Baalbek, Majdel Zoun, Ayt-a-Shab, etc. will all look a whole lot worse than Dresden and Berlin. And Beirut may in the end become hotter than Hiroshima.Attention Lebanon--your country is smoldering because Jews are sick and tired of being murdered. You keep pushing those
pathetic, weak, Torah studying Jews by using terrorism and kidnapping soldiers and all, yes all, of Lebanon will be smoldering.

I urge any person that will be having dinner with Sayed Hassan Nesrallah, the big fat brave man hiding in his little rat hole while his fighters are being picked off like little olives on a tree, to make sure his life insurance is fully paid. Nasrallah is just a pimp for Iran, sending out his Hezbollah terrorist hookers to "screw the Jews." The amazing thing is that Iran is not an Arab country. They should not be involved in the Arab-Israeli conflict. They do not border Israel, so there is no Iranian territorial dispute where they claim, like everyone else, that Israel occupies their land. Yet, Ahmadinejad's (pronounced--"a mad dog on Jihad") hatred for Jews and Israel rivals that of Adolf Hitler.It is no wonder that the Iranian president feels this way. Israel is supreme in virtually every area--technically, militarily, scientifically, culturally, morally and religiously. Each attempt by macho Muslim/Arab countries to destroy Israel has been met with a totally devastating, humiliating defeat. Like Saddam, the skinny little Ahmadinejad aspires to be the big hero of the Muslim world.

Ahmadinejad should not be deluded into thinking that he will get off as lightly as the Lebanese. He does not comprehend is that Israel will not use a tongue depressor when they capture him and his associates. Should Iran dare make one wrong move on Israel, Israel will simply "Beat the Shiite out of them!"

Who Needs Those Highly-Trained Anemones Anyway?

2006-08-25T15:50:00.003+01:00

Pop Quiz before I get onto an account of our luverly London trip later kidz:

Who dya think would say the following?

"The NY Times is no more biased against Israel than any other US paper, and has no more of a tendency to plaster negative news about Israel all over the front page than any other US paper. It's only a target for idiots like moderndayknight because it's a newspaper of record and it reports news items that they dont want to hear. It's never good policy to shoot the messenger, or as I like to call it "pulling a Saddam Hussein" (who was famous for shooting anyone who brought him bad news)"

"I dont know jack about the british media but the US media, including AP and reuters (which is half belgian), does not have an anti-israel agenda."

"Pointing out something I know for a fact...that there is no institutionalized anti-israel conspiracy in the media, is always helpful to Israel."

"EU Referendum, for its part, probably did as much harm as good. by their own admission they blew the AP and Reuters people off when they asked to talk to them and took a confrontational attitude that most likely made them less than inclined to play ball and remove the photos."

"EU Referendum was not exactly a huge help posting this stuff and implying AP was intentionally deceiving people. the blog post was not considered a "smoking gun". the theory was not verified until some german news agency ran footage of green helmet stage directing the whole thing and taking bodies out of ambulances.I have experience dealing with both reuters and AP in israel. they pride themselves on accuracy and are solid companies. if you can make a solid case that their information is not credible they will remove it from the wires. always. hell if you talk to the actual reporters in the field they'll correct it before it ever hits the wires."

(emphases mine)

So, guesses? How about a senior Foreign Office Official? Guardian Journalist? Kofi Annan? Kathleen Carroll of Associated Press? Green Helmet Guy?

No. A " 'highly-trained, vastly experienced' pro-Israeli activist'. "

As the saying goes, with friends like these...oh, and he told them all to vote Kadima as well. What an utter tool.

Zionist Conspiracy Travel Excursions Present...

2006-08-18T16:02:00.000+01:00

Blogging shall be light for a while, my fellow evil conspirators, as we are all going to London to plot more ways to control the entire wuuuuuuuurrrrrrld!!!!!!! with some other members of the great Conspiracy. And their gorgeous new baby.

Have a happy few days and may peace prevail wherever you are.

Save The Children - Officially Judenfrei

2006-08-14T17:09:00.000+01:00

Via Stephen Pollard, it seems that Save The Children are now taking their 'impartial charity work' to a rather different place. Yes, Save The Children has made itself, by its own admission, officially Judenfrei. The reason? No, not that they are choosing to emote over Arabs rather than those pesky Jooooz who cause all these 'humanitarian crises' by refusing to allow people to murder their civilians at will, but because 'Israel has systems in place' to deal with such matters as dozens of Katyusha and Qassam rockets being fired into their cities at random.

The message? Its OK to violently target children of 'certain' religions in 'certain' countries as long as they have 'systems' in place - but not others. Oh, wait - apparently the UK doesnt have 'systems' in place either, in fact there only seems to be one country where children regularly suffer 'dislocation' as a result of violence which does have these vaunted systems in place which exclude it from receiving Save The Children's largesse.

There is only one word for this, and its not one I like to use unless its clearly justified because it is probably the most overused one in the English language. But this is racism, in the clearest possible sense of the word, and should consign Save The Children to the evergrowing list of Leftist NGO's with an anti-Jewish and pro-Terrorism agenda which all of us should boycott forthwith.

Associated Press Lies Continue - 'Green Helmet Is Actually Just A Regular Family Guy'

2006-08-12T18:47:00.000+01:00

In a truly astonishing anti-Israel propaganda piece, AP's Kathy Gannon embellishes the fiction that Green Helmet Guy is 'just a rescue worker'.

"I am just a civil defense worker. I have done this job all my life."

And not only that, he's a family guy as well. Awww...

Even after the Qana video footage showing him orchestrating the puppetry of bodies being moved to and from ambulances to give a better shot for the cameras, even after he tells the cameraman he isnt getting the right kind of footage, even after the 'civilians' of Qana are seen clearly following his orders and deferring to him almost fearfully, Associated Press are still telling lies.

The media is the enemy too. Never a truer word was spoken.

Nice Little Country You've Got Here, Prime Minister...

2006-08-12T17:49:00.000+01:00

...we wouldnt want anything to happen to it, would we?

Yep, here are those good old 'British Muslim Groups', channeling Monty Python again...

"Prime Minister, As British Muslims we urge you to do more to fight against all those who target civilians with violence, whenever and wherever that happens."

Funny, you bastards didnt seem all that bothered about all those dead civilian Hindus not all that long ago. You know, 200 or so of them, 'targeted' by your co-religionists? No letters to the Prime Minister on that occasion.

"It is our view that current British government policy risks putting civilians at increased risk both in the UK and abroad."

Well you got that right. Having a group of hundreds of thousands of people who want to live under Sharia Law and who think bombing their fellow citizens is 'justified' in your democracy is definitely a dangerous, even negligent policy.

"To combat terror the government has focused extensively on domestic legislation. While some of this will have an impact, the government must not ignore the role of its foreign policy."

Damn straight. Supporting other nations under daily terrorist attack who actually fight back and kill terrorists as oppose to inviting them to help make policy might help with that.

"The debacle of Iraq and now the failure to do more to secure an immediate end to the attacks on civilians in the Middle East not only increases the risk to ordinary people in that region, it is also ammunition to extremists who threaten us all."

Yup, with you there. Except the resolution you want isnt one stopping attacks on all civilians, because you werent writing letters when the Paliswinians were launching daily rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip on Jewish civilians, and you certainly werent writing them when Hezbollah launched dozens of rockets ina single day against Jewish civilians. What you really mean is 'stop attacks on terrorists who deliberately surround themselves with civilians' in direct contravention of the Geneva Convention, not all 'stop attacks on civilians'.

"Attacking civilians is never justified. This message is a global one."

Well, yeah. Except your co-religionists, not the British Government, are the ones attacking civilians globally. Dont see that many letters being written to the various Islamic terror groups who have bombed, beheaded and murdered the civilians of literally dozens of countries in the past year.

"We urge the Prime Minister to redouble his efforts to tackle terror and extremism and change our foreign policy to show the world that we value the lives of civilians wherever they live and whatever their religion."

Fine. We'll start by doing a simple survey of every Muslim household in Britain and asking them 'do you think the 7/7 bombings were justified?'. Then we'll ship every one of them that says 'yes' off to a country where they can't do any further harm to civilians they don't like. Like say, the moon.

"Such a move would make us all safer."

Shocking how much we agree on isn't it? This must be that common ground thing all these 'Interfaith' groups talk about when they're not passing motions condeming Israel for existing.

Listen, you arrogant swine. Don't threaten my country, or even my weasel of a Prime Minister, loathe the man to my boots though I do. Those of us who arent nutball Islamists or Leftists using said nutballs as footsoldiers against our culture know exactly what needs to be done to 'make us all safer'.

And it isnt changing our foreign policy.